Watch Hands of Stone

Hands of Stone

Hands of Stone is a movie starring Edgar Ramírez, Usher Raymond, and Robert De Niro. The legendary Roberto Duran and his equally legendary trainer Ray Arcel change each other's lives.

Other Titles
Yede'y ha'even, Puños de piedra, Pumni de piatra, Akmenines rankos, Hands of Stone - Fäuste aus Stein, Manos de Piedra, Ruke od kamena, Mains de pierre, Mãos de Pedra, Kamienne pięści, Punhos de Aço, Manos de piedra, ハンズ・オブ・ストーン, Μαζί ως την κορυφή, 光榮擂台, Kőkezű
Running Time
1 hours 51 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Sport, Drama, Biography
Jonathan Jakubowicz
Jonathan Jakubowicz
Rubén Blades, Edgar Ramírez, Usher Raymond, Robert De Niro
Panama, USA
Audio Languages
English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

Growing up in Panama, Durán is home-schooled by Chaflan, who teaches young Roberto some vital life lessons. Later, Duran joins a boxing club with Nestor "Plomo" Quiñones as his coach. As he reaches 20, an American legendary boxing trainer Ray Arcel, who nearly lost his life after being attacked by an unknown assailant in 1953 in New York City and is now living with his wife Stephanie, notices Roberto's raw talent and punching power and takes the young fighter under his wing, becoming his coach. Not long after, Durán then meets a student, Felicidad, with whom he later has five children..

Comments about sport «Hands of Stone» (20)

Patricia photo

I am a fan of Clint Eastwood. The fact that he is playing himself in the film doesn't hurt my love of the man. That being said, the fact that the main character is himself is an interesting twist. The other major twist is that his brother is really cool and tough. But the real strength of the film is the character of Black. While he isn't the best actor in the world, he is an inspired performance and does a great job. Overall, a good movie and a solid Clint Eastwood film. * out of *

Steven photo

Troy's Jack Ludlow is still a champion athlete and professional wrestler. His daughter Annie is still in high school and is an avid athlete. So it was kind of strange to see him sitting on the bench in a boxing ring with a bunch of kids. It was a "B" movie, but that's the kind of movie it was. As I said, I think the movie was too long. The music was good, but the boxing scenes were too much and the movie was too long. I think it could have been better if it was shorter. I think the movie could have been better if the boxing scenes were shorter. Overall, I think the movie was good, but I think it could have been better. The boxing scenes were too long, but the movie was good.

Melissa W. photo
Melissa W.

Now, I love baseball, and I have always liked "Baseball Hall of Fame" movies. So, I went to see this movie. I wanted to like it, and I was disappointed. I didn't like the acting, I didn't like the characters, and I didn't like the story. I liked the ending, but I didn't like the story. The baseball was beautiful. The umpire was great. But, I couldn't see a baseball. It's too hard to tell a baseball. I don't know if it's the baseball, or the umpire. I don't know if it's the story, or the acting, or the direction. I like baseball, but I didn't like this movie. I think that everyone should see it.

Mary R. photo
Mary R.

I don't get why so many people are saying that this film is terrible. I would love to say the same for it, but I just don't get it. I have no problems with the acting, though there were a few parts where it felt like they had no chemistry at all. The story itself is very well put together and the movie never becomes boring. The only problem I have is with the way they were shot. The fight scenes in this movie are very well done, but when they zoom in on them, it is just not quite the same. I understand that in a film like this, you have to keep the focus on the actors and let the action and the camera work do most of the work, but this was a little too much. I'm still going to see it though, just because it's a good movie.

Marie Cox photo
Marie Cox

This movie will only appeal to people who have read or watched the books and that's a sad commentary on the current movie craze. All the good reviews I've read about this movie were from people who were either going to see it or were fans of the books. The movie is great for the fans of the books, and the movie isn't. If you don't like the books you will hate this movie. If you liked the books, you won't like this movie. If you're not a fan, don't bother. It's too bad this movie didn't make the theaters, because it would have done much better. It's a fun movie for fans of the books, and that's all it's supposed to be. If you haven't read the books, it's not that interesting, but if you have, you should at least try to see it. If you're a fan of the movies, see it, and if you're not, don't bother.

Evelyn Ortega photo
Evelyn Ortega

I haven't watched this film in a long time, but the review I saw was glowing, so I decided to see it. What a mistake! The film is not worth watching. All the stars are over-the-top, the storyline is a mess, the characters are made to look like caricatures, and the cast is all cliches. It's not even a good film, just a bad film. When I saw the reviews, I thought it was going to be great. I thought the acting was great, the story was strong, the locations were beautiful, the setting was authentic, the dialogue was sharp, and the scenery was beautiful. But no. I left the theatre feeling irritated, confused, and the movie made me feel like I had just wasted two hours of my life. The best part of the film was the finale. It was brilliant. The main characters are charismatic, interesting, and exciting. The actors make you feel like you are a part of the movie, not just a viewer. I really liked the fact that the main characters are flawed, so you feel sorry for them, but still love them. You don't hate them for their flaws, you like them for their flaws. You don't want them to win, but you hope for them to win. And that's what the movie's ending was. In the end, you don't hate the main characters. You love them. You want them to win. And they do. I was happy with that. The movie was supposed to be about the character of Tony, but it was just a gigantic movie about a character, and a big cast. I wish I could go back and watch this movie again, but I won't. So, I think I can recommend it to the people who love a good film.

Richard M. photo
Richard M.

James Dean in the movie "Hands of Stone" is not only an amazing actor but a very well-rounded human being. While Dean is portrayed as a self-obsessed, ego-driven, and seemingly unstoppable alcoholic, he was a good person with a good heart. Dean's tragic and tragic story, as told in this movie, is one of human redemption. When you think of the story of James Dean, you might think of one of the greatest movies ever made. However, when you think of the story of the man, you think of the best movie ever made. A true masterpiece. However, this is not a movie for all audiences. If you are in a time of tragedy or mourning, and want to get through a movie to see how James Dean was able to make a difference, or have some closure on the matter, then this movie is not for you. But if you are an actor, director, or writer, who wants to see James Dean at his best, then you will love this movie.

Teresa Chen photo
Teresa Chen

The fact that this movie is so overlooked, and so poorly done by many people, is baffling. And it's just the same way with all the Michael Jordan movies, which just do the same. People are choosing the Jordan movies over other movies because they want to see Michael Jordan play basketball, and if the Jordan movies are good, it's because they're Michael Jordan. The same thing happened with "Saving Private Ryan". People are choosing the movie over the book, because they want to see Tom Hanks play a soldier, and if the book is good, it's because it's Tom Hanks. But in the end, if it's good, people are going to like it. In this case, it was the worst choice of movie of the year. The whole movie was a big yawn. There's no story, there's no sense of adventure, and it's a total waste of time. Don't watch it. It's bad, and it's the worst movie of the year. And I can't believe so many people are saying it's good. Why would you like it? I really can't understand it.

Henry S. photo
Henry S.

The casting of Josh Hartnett in this movie is a brilliant idea, and it is a good idea. He plays a boxer who has a great future and then he loses his mind and begins to act like a crazed lunatic. His brother is killed by the Russian boxer, so the brother and the brother's girlfriend get out of jail and head to the local boxing gym to train for the upcoming fights. The acting is great. If you are a fan of boxing you will love this movie, and if you are not you will love it. I have to say that it was one of the best boxing movies that I have ever seen.

Victoria S. photo
Victoria S.

The best part of this film is seeing Patrick Swayze perform. He has a great voice and plays a very convincing Irish hero. Also, the music is very good. However, this film does have a very annoying movie poster. The poster looks like it belongs to a middle school, which doesn't look very good. It is not necessary to see this film. I can see how this film would be liked by some people, but I don't think that people will really enjoy this film. Also, I think that this film will not make you cry, but I don't know why. It may make you angry, but I don't think that this film will make you cry.

Joe photo

A lot of people don't like this movie. They call it a bad remake. Well, it's not a remake. It's a re-imagining. It's a bit different, but not a bad movie. It's a great movie. No one should be offended by this movie. The story is about an Irish boxing champ named "Juanita" (played by Daphne Zuniga) who is going to be the first female to ever win a world title. However, Juanita does not believe that she can actually win a world title. This is the most controversial part of the movie. I think it's fair to say that the majority of the people in this movie thought that this was a terrible idea. The director wanted to make a movie with a much different feel than the original movie. He wanted to make a movie that was very different. This is a very difficult thing to do. I don't think the director succeeded. The movie is quite entertaining, and it's not terrible. The acting is pretty good. There are some good supporting characters. The movie is quite different from the original. The characters in this movie are more well defined. There are no dumb, silly, or terrible characters. The characters are defined. In the original movie, the characters were not well defined. The characters were dumb, but they didn't have to be. In this movie, the characters are defined. There is a line in the movie where the main character tells the narrator that she has "changed." The narrator replies, "I don't believe that she has." This is the point. The characters have been defined. The characters have been made. This movie has changed. I think the movie was pretty good. I don't think it's the greatest movie of all time. It's not a bad movie, but it's not a great movie. It's okay. I give it a 7/10.

Anna P. photo
Anna P.

I really wanted to like this movie. I went to see it with a friend, who was a big fan of the original. He said it was a good movie but the characters were not developed enough. I liked the fact that the actors portrayed their characters. I am a huge film buff and I have seen a lot of movies. So I don't know why I would not like the movie. I thought that the story line was a little out of place and the acting was not good. I thought that the fights were not as exciting as the movie. It did have a good ending though. I think that I would rate this movie a 7 out of 10.

Keith photo

I saw this movie the first time back in 1995, and I have to say I was more than pleased with the movie. When I got to the end of the movie, I felt like I had a good time. Even though the movie had a slow pace at the beginning, it was a nice and nice transition into the second half. The ending was very well done. It was an ending that just had me wanting more. The movie was also a good amount of action, and the whole thing felt very authentic. I have to say I liked it the first time I saw it. When I saw it the second time, I had a lot of issues with the movie, but I thought I would just give it another chance. I decided to give the movie a second chance, and I thought it was still good. I think it's a good movie, it's not the best movie, but it was still a good movie. I still enjoy the movie, and I will probably watch it again. I would like to give this movie a good review, but I don't want to give it too much. I am glad I saw this movie, I really liked it.

Robert photo

A baseball star on the verge of making the big leagues becomes embroiled in a scandal involving a local policeman, and the potential threat to his career. This is a pretty good film. The subject matter is pretty serious, but the plot is well-structured, and the actors and chemistry between them are quite good. The two star power players of the film are a real pleasure to watch, particularly with the legendary Henry Thomas as the lead, and Bob Hoskins as the sidekick. Thomas is a fine actor and he does a good job here. Hoskins is equally good as the sidekick, and he does a good job as well. However, this movie is not for the faint of heart, and it's a real hard movie to watch. The racial themes are just a little too strong, and I don't think that this movie should be compared to other movie that depict similar themes. I think that this movie deserves a lot more credit than it's getting, and it's not often that a baseball player can become the subject of such controversy. This movie was certainly well-made, and I think that it's one of the better baseball movies out there.

Linda photo

I have to say that I think the movie was very well made and certainly worth a watch. The film is based on the true story of the last training match between boxing champ Lennox Lewis and two strong boxer: trainer Teddy Atlas and the legendary James "Buster" Douglas. The movie also shows how a man that has been trained for more than 50 years by two very good boxing trainers like Buster Douglas can come in the last moment of his life to fight against a more experienced fighter. As I said before, the film is based on the true story of Lewis and Douglas and it is a very good film. I recommend that you watch it.

Teresa Hanson photo
Teresa Hanson

We all know, and we all love, Johny-Gordon's work. But here he stars opposite Matt Damon. That alone is a huge disappointment. The other two lead roles were all given to some of the best actors of our time. That said, I still enjoy watching this film. It's not the most riveting film, but it's entertaining. The script is better than average. The direction is better than average. The acting is not the best I've ever seen, but it is not the worst. The pacing is not the best. The cinematography is not the best. And there is some interesting music. That's all the good I can say about this film. So, the best thing you can do is see this movie. If you don't like it, that's fine, but don't see it again.

Jonathan Pearson photo
Jonathan Pearson

Although the film is better than most of the historical films that have been released recently, there is a real danger in making a film about the sport of baseball. It is the game that was not played with joy, but with anger, and because of this, the emotions of the participants were captured well. The film is filled with many baseball highlights, and has an excellent cast. It is not the best film I have ever seen, but it is certainly worth a viewing.

Mildred Edwards photo
Mildred Edwards

This film is about two men who join a team of eight as they prepare for a race. The film does an excellent job of presenting the human story of the team members and their work together. The characters are developed and the film creates a world that is rich and colorful. The characters are portrayed well, but there is also the feeling that the characters could have been written better. The director uses some interesting camera angles to emphasize the slow and steady pace of the film. I was very happy with this film, but the performance of Tommy Lee Jones as the coach was very good, and it seems like he is going to be a bigger star in the near future. However, this film is a good example of how to make a good film about sports and human life. I think the film could have been a little better, but it still has its strengths.

Bryan S. photo
Bryan S.

This is a film that can be watched by everyone and will be enjoyed by many. If you like the likes of the likes of Harold and Kumar or The Mask Of Zorro then this is a must watch. If you are more of a kid you will probably enjoy it as much as the adults. There is nothing like a movie like this to give you a huge smile on your face and a feeling of satisfaction that you just watched a great movie. It is a movie that you can watch again and again. If you are looking for a great story then this is the movie for you.

Grace Freeman photo
Grace Freeman

It's a beautiful film with a strong sense of style and character. I loved the emotional journey of the main character, and the underdog in a professional sporting environment. It was a film that I will always remember and talk about. It's one of those movies that you will love, and you will want to watch it over and over again.