Watch Peterloo

Peterloo

Peterloo is a movie starring Rory Kinnear, Maxine Peake, and Neil Bell. The story of the 1819 Peterloo Massacre where British forces attacked a peaceful pro-democracy rally in Manchester.

Other Titles
ピータールー マンチェスターの悲劇, ピータールー マンチェスターの悲劇, La tragedia de Peterloo, Πίτερλου
Running Time
2 hours 34 minutes
Quality
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres
History, Drama
Director
Mike Leigh
Writer
Mike Leigh
Actors
Neil Bell, Philip Jackson, Maxine Peake, Rory Kinnear
Country
UK
Year
2018
Audio Languages
English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Subtitles
日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

The story of the 1819 Peterloo Massacre where British forces attacked a peaceful pro-democracy rally in Manchester.

Comments about history «Peterloo» (20)

Gregory W. photo
Gregory W.

This is an enjoyable movie. It was entertaining, and there was a lot of historical information about the war. But the movie did not have a single scene that made me cry. The scenes were there, but it was not the emotional scenes that made me cry. And the acting was decent. That is the best part about this movie. The movie was entertaining, but it wasn't great. But it was a decent movie. I recommend it to anyone that enjoys a good war movie. It is worth the money.

Elizabeth W. photo
Elizabeth W.

Well, I am a bit tired of reading comments about this movie. Why? Because it is one of the most beautiful films I have ever seen. I've seen it twice and I'm still enthralled. "Gladiator" was the best film of that time period. "Gone With the Wind" was the best film ever. "Dracula" was the best film ever. But "The King's Speech" is the best film I've ever seen. I didn't expect to be so impressed by this film. I was. I think that it's the best movie I've ever seen. I'm going to see it again, it's just that great. The acting is good, the script is good, the plot is great. I think the film is really great. It's so good that I can't stand "It's a Wonderful Life" or "The Wizard of Oz."

Bobby M. photo
Bobby M.

The story of the King of England's struggle against Napoleon is of a time when the ideals of liberty and justice were all around him. This film shows the struggles that the King and the French had in trying to win over the minds of the English. We are treated to some great performances by all involved in this movie. The acting is superb. The king is played by the great Richard Burton. He is absolutely convincing in this part. I also liked the portrayal of the King of France played by the great Ernest Borgnine. He is just as good as Burton. The Frenchman is played by the great Charles Laughton. He is just as good as Borgnine. Also, there are some great supporting roles played by great actors. The most memorable is the character of the Duke of Norfolk played by Harry Andrews. He is very good. I enjoyed the way he portrayed the Duke. It is a fine film. It will make you think about the King's struggle for his country. It is very good.

Randy Burke photo
Randy Burke

It's the first English-language film to be made in the medieval era. It's based on the autobiography of John Milton's son, which took place in 1625. The film is a kind of historical drama, but also tells a story of love and betrayal. The two main actors are Gerard Butler and Colin Firth. Gerard Butler plays John Milton, the writer of Paradise Lost, and Colin Firth plays John Milton, the poet of Paradise Lost. Firth's character is a nobleman and a little sadistic, but he is also really interesting in the way he portrays the tyrant of the time, Sir John Marston. He is also interesting in the way he portrays the English aristocracy. Butler's character, though, is more aggressive, and more cruel. He is also obsessed with Paradise Lost, and his plan is to destroy the manuscript. The main problem with the film is that it is too short. It is two and a half hours long, which is too short for an English-language film. There are some wonderful images in the film, especially when John Milton meets his wife. In the end of the film, the film is about love, betrayal, and revolution. The film is based on Milton's own autobiography, and it does a good job of telling the story. The acting is good, the story is good, and the film is worth seeing.

Doris W. photo
Doris W.

It's good to see a movie that was made after the events depicted in the novel, and I'm glad I saw this one. It's not a film that everyone will like, but if you enjoy the book, then you'll probably like it. The movie is, quite simply, not a good adaptation. It's not a film that's as close to the book as I'd like it to be. The story is rather confusing, and is lacking in any real depth. It's clear that the movie is not trying to replicate the novel, as it's made to be as close as possible to the original novel. The characters are also very poorly portrayed. They're not likeable, and there is no depth to any of them. The casting, too, is bad. Emma Thompson does a good job in the role of Elizabeth. She's funny, beautiful, and a great actress. I wish that she'd had more screen time in this movie. And, surprisingly, Richard Burton does a good job as Sir Edmund, the Duke of Buckingham. He's also a good actor, and he does a good job portraying a character that is so unlikeable. And, of course, Ian Holm is great as the King. I never saw him as a great actor, but he does a good job here. The rest of the cast is pretty bad, too. The only one that comes close is Christopher Lee, who plays Sir Bedevere. He's okay, but he's not very memorable. The movie is good for its length, and I like how the story ends. I don't know if this is necessary, but I think it's important. It's nice to know that you can leave a movie when it's done. It's not a great movie, but I can't say that it's awful. It's not a great film, but I like it.

Julia photo
Julia

I saw this movie without really knowing what it was about. I was intrigued by the fact that it was a movie about a historical event and that a lot of time was devoted to the performance of the actors. I was very pleasantly surprised to see the movie was not all about the cast and the acting. The story was engaging and entertaining. The characters were very well written and the story flowed quite well. The movie was very accurate to historical events. I believe the cast was good. I do not know how it would have been with more experienced actors. The movie does have it's moments where the acting is very bad. However, I thought the performances were very good overall. I would recommend this movie to anyone looking for a good historical movie.

Kyle photo
Kyle

Despite the fact that I am a fan of this genre, I have never seen the film, but having read some reviews here, I was curious to see how the film would compare to other films. I was not disappointed. This is a great film. I believe it is the best of the entire series. The acting was good, the script was well written, and it was not a dull moment. The violence was brutal and effective, and the final scene was a great conclusion to a fantastic trilogy. I do not think that the film is a classic, but it is still very entertaining. The production values were great, the costumes were amazing, the sets were excellent, and the special effects were very realistic. I am still not sure what people were expecting from this film, but I believe it was the best of the entire series. I give this film 7/10.

Austin Hart photo
Austin Hart

This movie is based on a book and as such is a documentary on history. As such, it is very different from other movies. It is more historically accurate and does not exaggerate. The actors were perfect for their roles. The scenes were well shot and the movie was so tense that I couldn't help but scream out my own screams. I would recommend this movie to anyone who loves a good movie. I give it an 8 out of 10.

Susan H. photo
Susan H.

I went to see this movie with very high expectations. The previews looked good, and I really thought the movie would be an epic-like film with some great acting and a great story. Unfortunately, the movie was not as good as I expected, but I am glad I saw it. I thought the movie was a good story about the civil war and the friendship of two young men. I found the movie not so bloody as some other movies, but the movie still was not very good. The movie is about two young men named James and Lewis, who are each other's fathers. The two men are in love with each other and try to protect their love from the Germans. James and Lewis are captured by the German soldiers, but they escape and they are saved by the British, who took them to the British consulate. They have to stay there for a while until they can get out of the country. One night, James and Lewis decide to get back to their friend's father. James and Lewis find their father in a very bad condition and they try to save him. They are not able to do it. They try to escape the Germans, but they are caught again and they are caught by the German soldiers. James and Lewis are captured again and they are taken to a prison camp. They try to escape from the camp, but they are captured again. They are finally rescued by a British soldier. They are rescued by the British soldier, and they are able to escape. The movie is an epic-like story about a war between two young men. It is not too bloody, but the movie still wasn't very good. The movie was very interesting, and the ending was good. I would recommend this movie to everyone who likes historical-fantasy movies.

Evelyn H. photo
Evelyn H.

This film is a mess. There are many flaws that must be mentioned, including some questionable aspects of the cinematography. The fight scenes are often boring and choppy. The plot is confusing and the ending is a cop out. The fight scenes are occasionally exciting and effective, but not often. The film suffers from the same problems that plagued the original film. However, the acting is better in this film. The casting is excellent and the performances are believable. The music is also fantastic. My only criticism is that the movie feels too long. The film is more than twice as long as the original film and is slightly longer than the original film, too. Overall, this is a great film that suffers from problems and should not be taken too seriously.

Jeremy photo
Jeremy

Before seeing this movie I was really excited to see it because I had heard so much about it. I was really looking forward to it and I have to say I was disappointed. First of all, the movie was not exactly great, it had some pretty good ideas and it had some decent acting and it had some really good sets and cinematography. But the movie was too long and it didn't really go anywhere. It had some good ideas but the movie just wasn't good enough to carry the weight of the movie. Some of the ideas in the movie were just really weak and the movie was kind of boring. The movie had some really good things in it, like the setting and cinematography. But the movie just didn't seem to go anywhere and it was really dull. There were a couple of really good ideas in the movie, like the idea of the gun and the way the movie was filmed. But the movie was just kind of dull and there was a lot of stuff that could have been left out. There was a couple of really good ideas but the movie just didn't go anywhere. The movie was just too long and boring. The movie was not great but it wasn't really that bad either.

Henry photo
Henry

Let me say that I love the movie, it is a great film and i was very excited to see it. I was not disappointed. The film is about a man who was a member of the British Empire, one of the best. His family were exiled to Australia by the British Empire. He lived in a hut in the bush, for the last ten years he is in love with a girl, and she is in love with another guy. He is also trying to figure out what is his place in the world. He decides to go to the Philippines to look for the girl and find out if she is with the guy she is in love with. I really liked this film, it was a great film with a great story. The film was a little slow, but it was a great film.

Jack Mendez photo
Jack Mendez

Despite the fact that I liked this movie, I do think that it is a little too long. It is also a little too long in terms of the length of the movie, and I think that there are some scenes that were unnecessary. I think that the movie would have been better if there had been less of a focus on the military aspect. The story of the war is important, but it should have focused more on the character of Captain John Smith, rather than just his job as a British soldier. Overall, I think that this movie is worth watching, but I think that it could have been better if it had more focus on the military aspect.

Diana Diaz photo
Diana Diaz

I'm not a fan of the British. I'm not even a fan of British actors. But this film was done very well. It wasn't overly sappy or overwritten, and the acting was very good. The characters were well-written and believable. The cinematography was very well done. The British accents were spot-on. The film was very well-made and beautifully shot. The acting was done very well, and the action was very well-done. I think the last scene, when the soldiers are all shot in the back, is quite powerful. This film is well worth seeing, even if you're not a fan of the British.

John photo
John

I never read the book but was really interested in the movie version. I watched the movie and i must say i really liked it. It was a really good movie and i was surprised how good it was. The only thing that i would change about the movie is that the dialogue was a bit too long, at some points it was just not that good. I thought the way they talked in the movie was too long and a bit too much. All in all the movie was a really good movie and I recommend it to anyone.

Jane Walters photo
Jane Walters

A friend of mine, who had read the book and liked it, asked me to recommend a movie. This is not the movie for him. The book is very interesting, but the movie had very little to do with the book. I loved the book, and I'm not sure I would have liked the movie if the book had been in the theaters. But I'm glad it was. The acting is excellent, and the movie is very well done. This movie is well worth seeing.

Karen Rodriguez photo
Karen Rodriguez

The scene of the executions is what drew me to this film. I watched it twice. It is not a simple plot. It is not a straightforward historical drama. It is about the "grievances" of the British Empire (particularly Britain and America) in the first years of the 20th century. It is about the "love" of the Spanish (and later the Germans) for the Spanish. The execution of the two men is shown as a sign of the power struggle between the two powers. As the film goes on, the film becomes more and more about the feelings of the people at the time. The "grievances" of the British Empire are not so much about the deaths of the men, but about the way the two powers were made to feel about each other. The film is certainly not for everyone, but it is certainly one that I will look at again.

Paul photo
Paul

The movie shows a French army on the eve of the battle of Waterloo. It's a very interesting movie and worth watching. One of the best movies about Waterloo. I think it is more interesting than the book. It is also more realistic.

Russell photo
Russell

This is a movie with a couple of different storylines, but the themes are all fairly realistic. It is a well-crafted film, and the cast is great. I'm not going to say anything about the acting, because you don't need to, because it's good. However, I will say that a few of the actors have a lot of charisma, which makes the performances all the more impressive. This is a movie that you can watch on the big screen, but you won't be bored. There are parts in the movie that are slow, but that is also part of the story. Overall, it's a great movie that you can watch with the whole family, and it will be one of your favorites.

Julie S. photo
Julie S.

Well, I'll be the first to admit, I am a huge fan of James Franco, but this movie is far from his best. I was very surprised to see that, while this movie is more a drama than a war movie, it still had many parts that made me feel emotional. The story of the soldiers is told in a very realistic way, with many details that you'll probably never see in a war movie. It has been done before, but this one is more realistic than usual. The characters are portrayed very well, with excellent acting. Even the supporting cast was good. I felt sorry for them, since they were forced to play such tough roles. The movie is very violent, but it's not meant to be. It's a story about soldiers, and it's also a story about war. The movie is very fast-paced, and it's great to see the troops being killed, and it's also great to see the soldiers getting killed, but I think that the violence is very exaggerated, and it could have been better. There are a lot of parts that are very unrealistic. But, I did not think that it was as bad as many other reviewers have said, because it's just a movie. Overall, I thought that the movie was good, and I would recommend it.