Watch Nada a Perder

Nada a Perder

Nada a Perder is a movie starring Petrônio Gontijo, Day Mesquita, and Beth Goulart. Self-financed fictional biopic of Brazilian bishop Edir Macedo, founder of the Universal Church of the Kingdom of God and owner of Record TV network.

Other Titles
Nothing to Lose, Nic do stracenia, Nada que perder, Nada Que Perder, Rien à perdre, Nada a Perder - Contra Tudo. Por Todos., Nada que perder 2, Nada a Perder 2
Running Time
2 hours 14 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Drama, Biography
Alexandre Avancini
Emílio Boechat, Douglas Tavolaro, Stephen P. Lindsey, Edir Macedo
Day Mesquita, Dalton Vigh, Petrônio Gontijo, Beth Goulart
Audio Languages
English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

Self-financed fictional biopic of Brazilian bishop Edir Macedo, founder of the Universal Church of the Kingdom of God and owner of Record TV network.

Comments about drama «Nada a Perder» (19)

Linda P. photo
Linda P.

Mallory's (Samantha Barks) family is in a financial shambles. Her brother is a drug addict and has no job. Her mother works in a branch of a local supermarket. Her father is in the military, and has no money to pay his daughter's tuition. He has to take care of his sick mother and he is constantly on the phone with the bank telling them about his loans and mortgages. Mallory finds a job at a convenience store and her sister is sent to a psychiatric hospital for a period of time. Her mother becomes depressed and the family is treated badly. In the end Mallory is able to get a job at a jewelry store and ends up working with a jewelry designer and is able to pay for her mother's treatment and other expenses. Her father is now able to make some money again. She is also able to pay for her sister's treatment and to buy food and clothes for her mother. The movie is very well acted by all the actors. The movie is well done, and the director did an excellent job. It is a very good movie, and I recommend it to everyone. This movie is a good movie and I think it deserves an 8/10.

Danielle N. photo
Danielle N.

Nada a Perder, a compelling and engrossing documentary about the life and times of Cuban writer Antonio Longoria, is a must-see for anyone who is interested in the world of literature and the Cuban Revolution. The film follows the life of Antonio Longoria, a Cuban writer and poet, who was born into a well-to-do family in 1926 and grew up in the South of the country. His family was extremely rich, but he was not allowed to go to university because he was a child and he had not yet attained a certain age. His mother was a poor woman and his father was a drug dealer. At a young age he would read the classics of Latin American literature, and at the age of 16 he would attend a traditional religious ceremony and then go to the beach for a family vacation. His mother was a staunch believer in the Revolution, and when he was 16 he took a series of essays to the university of Havana, and he was accepted to study literature and literature in general at the University of Havana, where he studied under the famous poet Alberto Sabato. He was accepted to study in London and returned to Havana in 1961 to be a lecturer at the University of Havana. His wife, who was from a wealthy family, tried to dissuade him from going to the University of Havana, but he was so impressed by the education and the education of the Cuban people that he was able to come back to the country and work for the Revolution. He was one of the first intellectuals to publish poetry in the country, and he was one of the first intellectuals to enter the government. His family had invested in the government and in the Revolution. His wife was illiterate and he had to find work for his wife, which is what he did in the professional fields of the Revolution. He was also involved in the revolutionary activities, and the revolution was a big part of his life. His wife was very depressed by the lack of education, and she left him and went to Paris. He would then go to the United States to find work, and he returned to Cuba in 1966 to work as a teacher, and he lived a very luxurious life, and he was able to live in the country, and his wife also became a doctor in the country. He never married again, but he remained very close to his son. He died in 1994 at the age of 91, and he was very close to his son and his wife. It was also a documentary about the revolutionary activities, and he was a very big part of that. He was a very important writer, and it was a good documentary about the revolution, but it also was a documentary about the life and times of a very important man. He was a very important person in Cuban history, and I highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in Cuba, literature, and the Cuban Revolution.<|endoftext|

Keith S. photo
Keith S.

This film is a wonderful documentary on the life of a famous Palestinian girl who was the victim of a terrorist attack. It is not the sort of documentary that would be very popular and would have been shot by a young, male director. As such, it is a little difficult to understand what exactly the director was trying to do with this film. After all, the film does not delve into the lives of the Palestinians who were killed in the 9/11 attacks. The film focuses instead on the life of Nada, an 8 year old Palestinian girl who survived the attack. After the attack, Nada is locked in a room with her family and in a very emotional scene, we see Nada trying to find out about her family. Nada has the opportunity to meet with her mother, her father and her older brother and her older sister. It is also a chance to see what life was like for the Palestinian people during the first days of the occupation of their land. One of the most disturbing scenes is the interview with Nada's father who is suffering from cancer. The interview is very disturbing in that his voice is a mix of sadness and anger. The father blames the Israelis for taking his daughter away from him and is very angry at the Israeli military for not taking the terrorists off the streets. It is not until Nada is about to be taken to an Israeli hospital that the father learns that he has been diagnosed with a cancerous brain tumor. He is in the hospital for two months and cannot speak and communicates with Nada by just looking at her face. He is also unable to leave the hospital because the Israeli authorities have ordered him to stay inside. There is a sense of helplessness in the father's voice as he looks to his daughter and to the world outside. The film is a good documentary that has been shot in such a way that it is difficult to understand what exactly the director was trying to do. It is a good documentary that should be watched by anyone who is interested in the subject. I am not a professional film critic but I have enjoyed the film and found it to be a very well made and emotional documentary.

Edward photo

I think this film is about the relationship between a mother and her son. It is a very touching film. It is hard to find a child that does not relate to this film. I liked it very much. It is very touching film.

Patrick P. photo
Patrick P.

I found this film to be both sad and uplifting. It is very difficult to understand what happened to the people who made this film. I think it is very interesting to see what happened to them. I also thought it was sad that they didn't even have the money to pay for the film. It was a very good film and very touching. I recommend it to anyone who likes a film about the consequences of war. It is a very good film and very moving. It is sad that so many people were so lost.

Aaron S. photo
Aaron S.

In my opinion, this is the best documentary on the subject of Irish politics. The film takes the viewer on a fascinating journey through the political scene of Ireland in the mid 70's. It's interesting to see how the government and opposition in the country are portrayed. The film shows the strong grip that the Catholic Church has on Irish politics. It also shows the differences between Protestants and Catholics and the role of the media. This documentary shows that the country was in a state of turmoil in the early 70's and the government wanted to keep a close eye on things. The film shows how the Catholic Church tried to censor the media and how the Catholic Church was a strong supporter of the left wing government. The film also shows how the Catholic Church was trying to influence the political scene and the media. The film is very informative and is well worth seeing. I would highly recommend this film.

Rachel K. photo
Rachel K.

I agree that the film was very close to the truth. I am just a retired Italian woman who saw the film at its premiere in Rome. I am not a very big fan of Tarkovsky. I did not know the man. But I thought that his films are very interesting. I thought that this film was not as much a biography as it was an examination of the inner thoughts of a man. He could have shown it more. I could have seen the life of another man who was also involved in the film, and maybe this could have made the film more interesting. But I can not help but think that the film was better because of the portrait of Tarkovsky. It was very well done, and Tarkovsky was an interesting man. It was interesting that he had a great vision for his film. I thought that the film was very much worth watching, and I will see it again.

Scott Kelley photo
Scott Kelley

I really enjoyed this film. The story is a unique one. The setting of the story is beautiful, and the characters are played very well. I thought that all of the actors did a great job and I thought that the direction was perfect. I thought that this film was really unique, and I would recommend this film to anyone that likes a little different, or to people who like stories with a strong moral message. I thought that the ending was a little sad, but I think that it was a good way to end it. I really liked it, and I would recommend it to everyone.

Debra Harper photo
Debra Harper

If I could I would say this film was a "must see". It was a film about a man who loved a woman so much he made her suffer through this "forced" marriage and then after the marriage he had her. Then he got married again. He did what he could to make her happy, he sacrificed everything to make her happy. There were many people who saw this film and it was very sad. He was also a gangster. He was not a good person and did things that he should not have. He was not a good man, but he was a very good man. The last part of the film is when the woman gets the divorce from the man. The man is a little bit more understanding and feels sorry for the woman and gets the divorce. He still lives with the woman and she is the one that has to live with the man who is dead. The woman is now with her mother. The man, her husband, is not with the woman anymore, he is with his father. I think this film is very good, but I have not seen it again because I don't like to see films about this kind of thing. I think this film should be seen, and even if you don't like the film I think it is a good film because it tells a story of a man who loves a woman so much that he will do anything to make her happy. It is a film about love.

Teresa photo

I watched this film about a year ago. It was made in the same year as Big Sur, about a group of young people in the mountains of California. However, the characters in Big Sur are the ones that we feel closer to. We see the sense of loss and the pain and the loss and also the joy of the people. In this film, the characters are all at least nomadic, but in the desert they are still living in one place. They are all mostly young people. Most of the scenes are in the mountains, but in the film there is some people in the desert too. The desert scenes are beautiful, but they are not as beautiful as the people. This film has a really beautiful score, and the scenes are well shot. This film is worth watching. It is a very personal film. There are no real people in the film, and it is a story that anyone could relate to.

Jason W. photo
Jason W.

This is one of the best documentaries I've seen in a long time. The film has a great soundtrack, and is shot in great detail. It's a shame the director left the film after a year of filming. He was great in the first few scenes, but as the film progressed, he seemed to become very uninvolved. When I saw him last, he was fine, but it was so obvious that he was bored with the project. I think he probably got burned out, or got an offer he couldn't refuse. The film is about a group of ex-soldiers, who were all depressed and had lost hope for the world. They were at a point in their life where they couldn't live in the past, and it's just a great shame that this film has no real story to tell. The film has a great soundtrack, and a great story, but it's not a story, it's just a collection of shots. I'm glad it's not a commercial, so I can watch it again. I would recommend it, but it's not a film I would buy.

Kenneth Welch photo
Kenneth Welch

I watched this film when it came out in the UK, and I must say that it's a truly beautiful film. It's a very sad story, but the real strength of the film is in the performances, especially by the two leads, and especially by the performance of the child actor, who plays the role of Zee. This is a great performance, and I would recommend this film to anyone, because it's a must see.

Zachary Larson photo
Zachary Larson

A very powerful film. A must see for anyone with an interest in historical/real life issues.

Frances W. photo
Frances W.

The movie was so amazing, it really had me engaged and wanting to see more. It is a story of a woman's life and how she was trying to find her own identity and stand up for herself. The acting is brilliant and the direction is very well done. The story is so moving and inspiring and the direction makes it look so real. I feel like this movie could have been a lot better and a lot more intense and it could have been a lot more funny but the directing is perfect and I was able to really feel what was going on. I recommend this movie to anyone who wants to see a story of a woman's life and the struggle she had to overcome and the impact she had on other people. This is a must see movie and a great way to spend your time.

Tammy G. photo
Tammy G.

The previous comment was very interesting, but I was unable to relate to the film. It seems as if a lot of people in the community have problems with this movie, but I'm not sure if it's just the viewer that is out of touch with the reality of the community. I'm only seeing it for the second time. I've seen the film on two occasions. I watched it in a theatre when it was released. It was not the best film I've seen, but it was better than most. I didn't understand the reaction of the audience to the film, but it was no big deal, I guess. I've seen it again, and it's better this time. I was very surprised to see that the film was filmed in the province of Quebec, the only province I know of that has a large aboriginal population. I think I've got it. In my opinion, the film was an accurate portrayal of a community that had many problems in the past, but had not lost hope, and had not lost the will to survive. I would recommend this film to anyone who likes to watch a documentary, or someone who likes to learn about the history of the community in Quebec. It's a good movie, and I enjoyed it.

Sandra Y. photo
Sandra Y.

I have not seen this film but I have read reviews of it on this site and I really wanted to see it. I thought I would be disappointed as this is a very well made film but it was even better than I thought. The actors were great, especially the young actors who played the young boys. It was very interesting to see a young boy, a young boy who is being thrown into the deep end of the river. They are both getting into trouble. The older boy is doing what he can to keep his parents from having to leave the city where they are living. The parents are in trouble and the older boy tries to help them but they are desperate. The parents of this boy are taking him in and he is doing well in school but he is not doing well with his parents. I enjoyed the film very much and thought it was very interesting and very well made.

Patrick Barrett photo
Patrick Barrett

I'm not a fan of the Greek classic Nada a Perder, but it was a much better movie than I expected. The characters are interesting, the story is fresh and the plot is fairly straight-forward. The acting is fine, although I felt that the older characters were somewhat under-utilized. The film is set in 1944, when most of the characters are young, and is a bit predictable, but that doesn't take away from the film. It is a good film, and I'm glad I watched it. My rating: 8/10

Paul F. photo
Paul F.

I was pleasantly surprised by this film. I thought the acting was superb and the characters well portrayed. The story is well written, and the ending is touching. I don't know if it will be a classic, but it is a good movie. I think it is a good thing that the women in the movie have to endure all of the abuse and violence that they are subjected to. It is a great lesson for women everywhere. I hope that this film will get more attention in the future. The only reason that I gave it 8 stars instead of 10 was because of the terrible accents. I mean, come on. Is it so hard to just speak English? The main actor in the movie was really good and I was really looking forward to the ending. I am glad that it didn't end the way it did. I would have preferred a different ending. However, I would recommend that this movie be shown in schools so that all of the kids can learn how to treat women like human beings and not just as sex objects.

Karen G. photo
Karen G.

This movie is not for all. It is the story of a young person who, because of a father's death, wants to be a painter. When he leaves the art school, he finds a job in a school which he would like to be in. His life is complicated because of the problems in his family and the student he takes care of. In the end, he has to confront his own problems. The movie is not easy to watch, because there is some strong language, violence, and many scenes which are not pleasant. The movie is about love, but the love shown in this movie is a very realistic one. It is not the love of a rich man, a kind of luxury, but the love of a young man who is really alone and needs to be loved. I recommend this movie for everyone, because the story is not easy to watch, but the message is very good.