Watch Ce magnifique gâteau!

Ce magnifique gâteau!

Ce magnifique gâteau! is a short starring Jan Decleir, Bruno Levie, and Paul Huvenne. An anthology film set in colonial Africa in the late 19th century telling the stories of 5 different characters: a troubled king, a middle-aged...

Other Titles
Welch himmlischer Kuchen!, Upea kakku!, ¡Este magnífico pastel!, This Magnificent Cake!, Tas nuostabus pyragas!, To niezwykle ciasto!, The Magnificent Cake
Running Time
44 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Comedy, Drama, History, Short, Animation
Marc James Roels, Emma De Swaef
Marc James Roels, Emma De Swaef
Jan Decleir, Gaston Motambo, Bruno Levie, Paul Huvenne
Netherlands, France, Belgium
Audio Languages
English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

An anthology film set in colonial Africa in the late 19th century telling the stories of 5 different characters: a troubled king, a middle-aged Pygmy working in a luxury hotel, a failed businessman on an expedition, a lost porter and a young army deserter.

Comments about comedy «Ce magnifique gâteau!» (19)

Gerald D. photo
Gerald D.

The movie is a wonderful tale of friendship and love, and of course, friendship and love. I love the way it goes along with the story. It really gets you into the movie. I don't think it's the best movie ever, but I still recommend it.

Catherine Kelley photo
Catherine Kelley

I was really impressed by the animation and the writing. If you like my work, you should see this. It was really funny and full of things to laugh at. The story is very strange and has many strange twists and turns. The characters are very colorful, and the animation is very beautiful. You will laugh and you will cry at some point. There are also many songs in this movie. This movie was really cool and well made. I recommend it to anyone who likes my work. It is really funny and full of things to laugh at.

Nicole Daniels photo
Nicole Daniels

I was a bit surprised to see this film being labeled as "Cartoons" (though I do think that this is a real attempt to deceive people by going with the title), but I have to admit that the film was a pretty good film. I do think that the film was somewhat slow at times and there were a few scenes that did not flow well, but overall I thought that this was a pretty good film. The film has a very good story and the animation was very well done. There were some nice images and the overall story was well done. I did think that the ending was a bit rushed and a bit weak, but overall I think that the film was a good film. I give the film a 7 out of 10.

Tyler R. photo
Tyler R.

This is a classic French movie that has been completely forgotten. I don't think anyone has ever seen it, and it's hard to find in most of the countries where it's shown. It's the story of a gay man who works for the French secret service, who is about to be exposed as a homosexual and is being blackmailed by a gay man who wants to blackmail him. The gay man who is blackmailing him is played by a brilliant actor named Claude Jarre, who was also the director of "Les Hommes du Chaise Matin" and "La Grande Vieuse" and the lead in "Doristes". This is an extremely well-made film with great actors, excellent sound, and beautiful photography. The film is set in Paris, and it's very difficult to find in the U.S. but it's very easy to find in France. It's a beautiful, romantic film, and it's a masterpiece of the French art-house movement. It's not just a film about homosexuality, but it's a film about human sexuality and it's importance in society. There is a lot of sex, but it's not pornographic. It's very important for society, because it's very difficult to have a healthy relationship between a man and a woman, because if one is gay, he or she will have a very difficult time getting married, and a lot of people are gay and not married. This is a very interesting film, and it's a shame that it's not shown very often. It's not a perfect film, but it's a very important one. I've seen it a few times, and it's really worth seeing.

Madison B. photo
Madison B.

I enjoyed the film, which is a pretty heavy subject to deal with in a single movie. For example, the debate of whether or not to invade Iraq. That said, I also enjoyed the film's visual style. It is a combination of art and entertainment, and works well on both fronts. The film was well shot, and used a lot of slow-motion and blurred film. The two-dimensional character design is interesting, and the main characters are well-written. The soundtrack is good, as is the script. The film is definitely not for everyone. It is not the best of the year, and the subject matter is not very mature. However, if you are in the mood for a heavy-handed, but well-made film, then you should definitely give this one a look.

Denise photo

I enjoyed the movie a lot. It is not so much about the religion, but more about the politics of the time. I was impressed with the way that the movie was able to explore the issues of the time. It is a good movie, and if you like it, I recommend you to go see it. My favorite part was the part about the suffering of the people of the time, and how they were afraid of the new way of living and the new values that were being imposed on them. It is a good movie, and I highly recommend it to anyone who likes movies that are a bit more than a mindless and shallow entertainment.

Diane Richards photo
Diane Richards

It's always nice to see a French film that has a similar premise to ours, and here it is. It's not a film that tries to be a comedy or a drama, it's a film that tries to be a film, with a story line that has nothing to do with comedy or drama. I liked this film, but I couldn't help but feel like it was missing something. It was like they ran out of ideas, or time, or something. This is a very small film, but it's a small film that works. It's a little sad that the characters are such caricatures, but I think that's the point. You never know what they're going to do next. They have no direction. There's no purpose to their lives. I liked this film, but it just didn't have a purpose. It just sort of happens, and that's it. If it were just an action movie, then I'd say it was good. It's action, and it's action with a purpose. I think that's what the director wanted, and he's got it.

Frank photo

I was pretty excited to watch this film when it was released, but I was disappointed that it wasn't exactly what I expected. As it is a small independent film, it could have been better. However, I still found it enjoyable. The story is about a group of teenagers, the members of which are rebellious, childish, and somewhat mischievous. One of the main characters, Jamie (Wrenn Schmidt), is constantly angry, because of a close relationship she has with her best friend. She is a very intelligent girl, and she is not easily provoked. However, her temper never gets the best of her, and she keeps causing trouble. The two main girls, Miranda (Wanda Russell) and Phoebe (Amber Kaiser), are also very intelligent and mischievous. They are the only members of the group who don't show their emotions, and they also aren't easily provoked. Miranda and Phoebe both have a very strong friendship. They are very good friends, and they have a strong sense of responsibility. However, they are also very rebellious, and their relationship with each other is very strained. They don't like each other, and they aren't afraid to show their emotions. This creates a very intense relationship between them. However, because of this, they are constantly arguing with each other. The two main characters have very strong emotions, and they keep having arguments with each other. The film is quite funny, and I enjoyed it. The film is quite emotional, and I found it very good. Overall, I liked the film. It was very enjoyable, and I enjoyed it very much. It is a good film to watch with your friends.

Arthur S. photo
Arthur S.

In this dark comedy, a famous musician decides to leave the country in order to avoid a divorce and death. There, he meets a sweet woman who lives in the country and, by the end of the film, she decides to leave her husband. A happy ending, however, is not to be found. This is a kind of film that deals with issues that we all have to face in our daily lives. The film was directed by Claude Chabrol and was adapted from the novel of the same name by Jean-Marie Le Pen. The film is not easy to watch at some points, but, I must say, the message is very important. I liked the idea of the movie, and I would like to see the director's other works.

Diane photo

This is an amazing movie, the story is beautifully presented. The people in this film have incredible skills. I think the most incredible thing is that the director made it to be a bit less about politics and more about making the movie. It's not a perfect movie, but it's definitely a great one.

Brittany Stone photo
Brittany Stone

I loved this movie, I would have liked it even more if it had been made in French with a French cast and crew. There are some very funny parts of this movie. However, the overall feel of this movie is very American. The Americans are very funny and are obviously a great influence on French culture. I enjoyed it, but the overall feel of the movie is very American. I think this is why this movie is not as good as it could have been.

Dylan Wilson photo
Dylan Wilson

This is a very sad film. It is set in the 1930's in a small village in France. It is about a young boy who falls in love with the village dog. I'm not sure if the plot is the same in the American version but the dog and the young boy are the same age. It's sad but funny and it makes you feel good. There is also a great love story that is very touching. The movie is very funny but it is also very sad and sad. It makes you think about the history of animals and how they are treated in the past. It is not a comedy and it is not a tragedy but it is a very sad and sad movie. It is not a comedy but it is very sad. The dog is very important and so is the young boy.

Daniel photo

I read the book as a teenager and was totally disappointed. My disappointment has never dissipated. I am a very critical person and I thought the movie would be better. I watched the movie last night and I really enjoyed it. The movie was entertaining, cute, and well done. It had good humor, action, and a little bit of drama. It was also entertaining to watch. The movie was set in a French world, the same world as the book, so the movie was a good adaptation. I thought it was more enjoyable than the book. I really enjoyed the movie and I think it was worth the money. I hope the movie does well. I thought the movie was entertaining, funny, and just plain fun to watch. I would definitely recommend the movie to anyone. I am very disappointed in the book because I was hoping to see a lot more from it. I have to admit, the book was better. It was more entertaining and I loved it. I would definitely recommend this movie to anyone who has not read the book. The movie was really well done and worth watching. I am definitely going to see the movie again. I think the movie was great. I liked the characters and the movie was entertaining. I was a little disappointed that the movie did not follow the book, but I will not judge the movie until I have read the book.

Katherine photo

While this movie was made by French studio Canal+ in 2006, it would be hard to find this in a store or a public library. This movie is not really a documentary, but more of a cinematic romp. The film is basically about the American and French audiences and their attitudes toward the French cinema. I personally found this movie to be very entertaining, and the French were just as well-informed as the American audiences. However, the characters were not exactly well-developed. The movie was also very visually appealing, but some of the shots were so abstract that I could not really tell what the point of the scene was. For instance, the French female reporter was sitting in a taxi, holding a cigarette. What was the point of that? Was it supposed to be a metaphor for her deteriorating relationship with her husband? The American narrator was also an abstract figure. He just sat there, talking to himself. The French narration was better, but I still did not understand all of the narration. There was a scene in which the narrator suddenly stood up and started to walk. The French narrator said to the American narrator, "You are walking. How do you know where to go?" This was also a really cool scene, and it was not really clear what the point of that scene was. The American narrator had a lot more to say, and it was more clear what the point of that scene was. Overall, this was a good movie, but not the best. The French were just as well-informed as the Americans.

Christian Mendez photo
Christian Mendez

I have to say that I was quite disappointed with this film. It had all the makings of a great film, but it wasn't. I wasn't bored, I was just bored. I thought the concept was great, but I found myself spending more time looking at my watch than actually watching the film. The film would have been a lot more entertaining if it had been longer, and had a lot more characters, and a lot more humour. It's still a very good film, but I feel like I would have been a lot more entertained if it had been longer. I recommend this film to people who like some really good comedy. I thought it was great, but it's not a great film. It's a really good film, but I wouldn't recommend it to people who are looking for a lot of humour.

Crystal J. photo
Crystal J.

In the title's first line, we are told that it is the first movie in a series. We are left to wonder why we are not just treated to the first installment of the movie. This is a mistake, as the movie does not have a title, and no one seems to have been interested in the idea of a movie in a series. We are also given no explanation as to why the story is told from the perspective of a group of people, instead of a singular character. It is also interesting that the majority of the movie is spent on one particular character, the director seems to be saying that this is the main character's story, and we are here to witness his story. However, the director's treatment of the characters is rather inconsistent. We see no one behaving in a non-repetitive manner, yet we see the director treat the characters as if they were in a family, or a small community. There are times when the characters are behaving as if they are a family, and we are not told why. In one scene we see the characters talk to each other, yet we are told that they are not a family, yet we see the director make us see them as if they are a family. The main character is treated in a similar way, although we are not told why. The acting is fine, with the exception of the child actor, who was played in an unsympathetic way, and was far from being convincing. The film is well made, the camera work is smooth and accurate, the music is good, and the animation is fine. I would recommend this film, but it is not for everyone. Some will be offended by the subject matter, and will be put off by the length. I would recommend this film to those who enjoy abstract works that are enjoyable to look at, but may not be interested in the stories being told.

Ronald Reynolds photo
Ronald Reynolds

I was hesitant about this movie due to the poor reviews, but I was pleasantly surprised. I was intrigued by the concept, and I was happy with the final product. The animation is amazing. The characters are fun and unique. The plot is very simple and the film is fun and energetic. I felt like I was watching a TV show. I recommend this film to anyone looking for a fun movie.

Samantha photo

I was just thinking about this movie and the movie poster as I was writing this comment. This is a movie which is quite a good adaptation of a book. I think the book is a bit more poignant than the movie but both are great movies. The story is a bit like a song but the song is very catchy and it is a bit sad when the songs are over. The song "Yours, Forever" is very good and it has a big impact on the story. This movie is not the best adaptation of the book but it is an adaptation which is good. I would recommend it to anybody who like the movie or to everybody who like the movie. It is a good movie to watch and I give it a 7 out of 10.

Larry photo

I've watched the movie a couple of times, and it's very enjoyable, I can't understand why the director chose to use a black and white approach. And when I realized that the story was about the pursuit of friendship and unity, I couldn't help but think about the "Mystery Science Theater 3000" episode about friendship and unity. The fact that the movie is about friendship and unity, is not that important, but the fact that it is about a big experiment on a life in the outer space, is very interesting. I can't imagine why people would hate it so much, I don't know how they could. I do understand that it's a very personal movie, but if you are a fan of Nicolas Cage, and you liked the "Hard Boiled" movie, you should give this movie a chance. I can't recommend this movie enough, I think that it's an excellent movie that you can watch, over and over again. The only thing that bothered me a little was the ending. It's the only thing that bothered me a little.