Watch Neruda

Neruda

Neruda is a movie starring Gael García Bernal, Luis Gnecco, and Mercedes Morán. An inspector hunts down Nobel Prize-winning Chilean poet, Pablo Neruda, who becomes a fugitive in his home country in the late 1940s for joining the...

Other Titles
ネルーダ 大いなる愛の逃亡者, Νερούδα, 追緝聶魯達
Running Time
1 hours 47 minutes
Quality
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres
Drama, Crime, Thriller, Biography, History
Director
Pablo Larraín
Writer
Guillermo Calderón
Actors
Emilio Gutiérrez Caba, Luis Gnecco, Mercedes Morán, Gael García Bernal
Country
USA, Spain, Chile, France, Argentina
Year
2016
Audio Languages
English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Subtitles
日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

An inspector hunts down Nobel Prize-winning Chilean poet, Pablo Neruda, who becomes a fugitive in his home country in the late 1940s for joining the Communist Party.

Comments about drama «Neruda» (23)

Zachary M. photo
Zachary M.

Perhaps I'm being too generous to my fellow critic, but I'd say that this is one of the best films I've seen in a long time. I had some problems with the pacing, but it's an impressive achievement, and certainly an achievement that doesn't let up for the whole length of the film. I'm not sure how I would grade the acting, but the acting is very good overall. Some people seem to think that there's no chemistry between the actors, but the actors themselves were very believable in their roles. The other problem I had was that it seemed like the ending was rushed. I think it was just a little too rushed. I think the ending could have been a little more definitive and it would have made the film more powerful. I also thought that it was a little unrealistic that the Russian people had the same faith in the Communist Party as the Germans. I don't think that there's a lot of religious fanaticism in Russia, and it's certainly not as crazy as it is in Germany, but I can see how it could be possible. I don't think the ending was entirely satisfactory, but I think it was done very well. In the end, I think that the ending of the film is the best of the film. I don't think it's the best, but it's the best of the film. I'm giving it an eight out of ten. I think it's a very good film.

Ethan Watson photo
Ethan Watson

Before reading this comment, I did not realize that there was a movie called "La Strada" (also known as "Carnage" and "Zorba"). But I'm glad I did, because this movie is a really good one. It is one of the best movies I've seen in a long time. The story is very interesting and the acting is great. The only thing I don't like is the ending, it is kind of confusing. The movie is worth watching, but it's not for everyone.

Frances photo
Frances

As a French-Canadian I am very disappointed in this film. It's about the "true" story of a brave young man who managed to stop the death squads from bombing civilians in Quebec. But it's so convoluted that you have to wonder if he was really a hero. But his story is presented in a very careless way and is made to appear as if he was a hero. You don't have to be a French-Canadian to know that it's the "real" story of a young man who is risking his life to stop the death squads. But the way it's presented in the movie makes you think that he was a hero. And the way he gets the justice he deserves is so absurd that it makes you think that it's a movie in which you're supposed to find it incredible. It's just ridiculous. The story is so important and important for the movie that you don't even notice the errors in the movie. But I must say that this movie is just not worth seeing. I hope you enjoy the movie more than I did.

Elizabeth photo
Elizabeth

I have not read the novel by the great Marcel Proust, but I can't imagine it as a film. The acting was quite good, but it's like watching a play. If you have a good book, it will be better. The story was interesting, but not really. The novel was too complicated, I didn't understand the meaning of all the stories. The story was a little complicated, but the characters were too much developed. I think they should have made the film as a film. I think that would be better. My vote is seven. Title (Brazil): "Vas a Indecês" ("The War")

Betty Cole photo
Betty Cole

Eugene Neruda, the world's most infamous fascist, was a fascinating character and was a great director. His movies were great because he was able to create a sense of reality that transcended the world he lived in. Neruda was a prolific writer who wrote about many things and was able to create an amazing story. His films were always interesting, and this one is no exception. Neruda was a man of great power and was able to make his vision of the world come to life. The movie was a great depiction of Neruda's power and his ideas. The movie does a great job of showing the differences between how Neruda thought and how people in his time thought. The movie is well worth seeing. I give this movie an 8/10.

Douglas C. photo
Douglas C.

This movie was interesting in that it was quite different from what I expected. It is based on the events of the Rosenberg case in which the U.S. Government used to try to convict the Jews. It was based on a book by John Stoltenberg which was very well written and presented. The movie has many twists and turns and is quite interesting in the way that it presents the case. The acting is very good. I did not think that it was a great movie, but it was very interesting. I do not understand why this movie is not more popular. I would recommend this movie to anyone who likes to see movies based on history. It is a good movie to watch and I give it a 7/10.

Hannah photo
Hannah

Neruda was a revolutionary Hungarian writer who, along with his followers, was murdered by the Communists in 1956. The film, made by the director of the National Film Museum, Olafur Eliasson, is about the life of Neruda and the people who knew him. It is very realistic, though some may say it is too much like life. But that's not the point. The film is about the human spirit. It's about the admiration and love for the human spirit, the ability to love without feeling guilty, and the love for the beautiful things in life. It's about how love can be strong even when it's not necessary. It's about how life is worth living, and the beauty of it. It's about the strength of the human spirit, and how to live life with integrity. It's about the courage to do what is right and make a difference. It's about the beautiful things in life. The film is very touching, and it's very realistic. It's not perfect. It doesn't have a perfect ending, but it's a good film. If you have never seen the film, go and see it.

Patrick Sullivan photo
Patrick Sullivan

There are a lot of good things about this film. There are also a lot of bad things. The first is the acting. I can't help but feel that there were times when my eyes were glued to the screen. I'm not one for looking at actors' faces during a film, but there was something about Val Kilmer's performance that I found almost painful to watch. The more I watched it, the more I was convinced that he was not the actor he was being portrayed as. The film suffers from the same problem as most Hollywood films do. It's difficult to get invested in the characters. The writing is simply atrocious. There are a lot of parts that are so slow and drawn out that they don't seem to serve any purpose. It's not until the final third of the film that I really began to get interested in the plot. The film is also very incoherent. There are a number of scenes that are so unbelievable that they make you wonder if it's all real. There are also some scenes that are so absurd that you can't help but laugh at them. It's a shame that the plot is so incoherent, because it could have been a great film. The writing is just as bad, and the acting is just as bad. All of the actors have a hard time delivering their lines, but I think that's what makes the film so bad. It's not so much the acting, but the script that is so bad. The film also suffers from its own over-the-top tone. I'm not sure how to explain it, but it's like the movie is trying to be serious all the time, and it just doesn't work. The only redeeming quality is the beautiful cinematography. The film does have its moments. The scenes that make the most sense are the ones that take place on the mountain. These scenes are beautifully shot, and it's nice to see a movie that doesn't go for the standard "campy" or "bad-ass" scenes. There are also some good acting performances, but overall the film is very poorly written. The characters are all caricatures, and the film is too inconsistent in its tone to care about. Overall, I really don't think this is a movie you want to see unless you're in the mood for something very bad. It's just too bad that Val Kilmer was in it.

Jesse M. photo
Jesse M.

In a year where the great director Fritz Lang's DIE WELT KRIEGER has been widely criticised for not being able to give an adequate and true biopic of one of the greatest filmmakers of all time, this film has the distinction of being the only truly convincing and accurate one. Not only is it an accurate and detailed account of the life and times of Werner Herzog, it's also a good historical document, with a historical record of the conflict between the two cultures of Austria and the rest of the Austrians. The best thing about this film is that it's a true story, not a filmic embellishment, and that it's told from the point of view of the people who were there. I have always liked the Austrian point of view, and this film brings me to believe that the Austrians had more in common with the Czechs than they did with the Germans. I believe that the Austrians, or rather the Austrian film industry, had a real opportunity to do some good in the world, and that this film is the only one of its kind. The film is superbly directed by Johannes Herzog, and he has the nerve to have Herzog play the part of the director. He's probably the best Austrian actor, and he was a tremendous director. The film is also beautifully photographed, and I think the director made the most of his material, because there's no acting involved. Herzog's artistry is on full display, and the film is a true masterpiece. The actors are very good, and I would recommend it to anybody who has an interest in the history of the cinema. It's a great film, and I can't recommend it enough. Grade: A

Andrew photo
Andrew

I thought the movie was interesting. But I have to say I don't think it's an Oscar contender. I'm not sure if it's because of the subject matter or the style of the movie, but I think it would have been better suited for a drama. And for the period it seems a bit dated. I'm not sure if I could relate to the story. It's not a bad movie, but I wouldn't call it Oscar-worthy.

Mary M. photo
Mary M.

It's been a while since I've seen a film that is so clearly an attempt to deconstruct the ideology that the film maker is attempting to communicate. And it's all right. It's as simple as that. As with any piece of art, you need to take a step back and take a step forward to understand what is being said. That's what this film does. As the film progresses, you'll start to realize that the movie is not trying to tell you how to feel, but rather what you should feel. The way the film portrays the audience's attitude towards the characters is what the director is trying to convey. The fact that the film has an ambiguous ending is what I mean. What I'm trying to say is that if you take the film's message at face value, it will be quite difficult to accept. The film doesn't try to be anything but an art house film. It is that simple. I don't know why this film has been rated so low. I think it's because people don't understand what the film is trying to say. I've seen people who have no idea what the film is trying to say, and yet they are agreeing with the message. I think it's because the message is being presented to them, and they don't have the mental capacity to understand what it is. If you have a chance to see it, I highly recommend it. It's definitely not your average film, and I think it's one of the best films I've seen in a long time.

Danielle Fisher photo
Danielle Fisher

Neruda's autobiographical novel is a real masterpiece. It is one of the few stories of its kind that has never been surpassed by any other. This film is a great tribute to the author's life, and to his extraordinary writing. As a story, it is beautifully told. As a biography, it is well done and engaging. As a film, it is superbly done, and one of the best films ever made.

Patrick photo
Patrick

Like his other films, this one has a simple plot and simple story. But it's beautifully told. It tells the story of a corrupt police officer (Pasha) who tries to frame a criminal (Rizvi) for a murder. They work together to get Rizvi convicted. He was sentenced to death but he was pardoned. The movie is not without its flaws. It has some scenes which I found laughable. The scene where Pasha is talking to his boss and the boss is a cracker, is not funny. Also, the scene where Pasha is having dinner with his wife, and she is holding a gun, is not funny. But what the movie is really great is the performances of the two main actors. The music is also superb. It fits the movie perfectly. I would recommend this movie to anyone who likes a good movie with a great plot and an interesting story. I rate it 7/10.

Sarah Lucas photo
Sarah Lucas

This film was released in 1990 and is directed by Anthony Minghella and stars Lina Romay and Olivier Martinez. It's a period piece and focuses on the rise of Pablo Escobar and his ruthless, sadistic and violent ways. Escobar and his group of thugs rule the cocaine trade in Colombia. Escobar is a major player in the business and is supported by the local police and the Colombian army. Escobar's sidekick is a blind and mute man who lives in a nearby shack. The blind man is played by Gerard Depardieu and he is the only one who is able to speak. Escobar's main lieutenant is played by Alvaro Paredes. Paredes is a hit man who is responsible for killing several high ranking drug lords. He's been given the task to kill Escobar and he is the only one who is able to do it. Paredes and his two men are the only ones who can handle Escobar. Escobar, who is a wealthy businessman, has a wife and children and is very protective of them. The film is about Escobar and his rise to power and how he is able to manipulate the Colombian military and the Colombian government to his own advantage. This film is a little bit long and it doesn't have a lot of action. However, the story is quite interesting. There are many things in this film that I didn't like, such as the fact that the blind man only speaks in English. Also, I thought the character of Gerard Depardieu was a little bit over the top. I also thought that there were too many plot twists in the film. This is a film that is not for everyone, but it is still interesting. I give it a B+.

Mark Olson photo
Mark Olson

Went to see this movie because I am a big fan of Pablo Neruda. I liked his films, but I found this movie to be very boring and forgettable. I was disappointed because I like Neruda's work, and I have heard that he was the best director ever. But I found this movie to be extremely boring, and I didn't understand why people are talking about this movie. I can't say that this movie is a masterpiece, but it is very good and worth watching. The movie was very boring and I didn't like it very much. I liked the acting and the story, but the plot was really boring and boring. I didn't like the acting of the main character, and I didn't like the story. I don't know why people like this movie so much, but I am sure that people who like Pablo Neruda will love this movie.

Adam S. photo
Adam S.

Another of L'Atelier's works, "Le Petit Prince" tells the story of a young man who goes to the great, wilds of the French countryside to be a child. His uncle, a doctor, takes him in and soon finds out that he is not the normal child. He is of course able to do some things, like running around, climbing trees, and even playing with his pet cat. But his greatest gift is that he is able to communicate with animals and is able to play with them. But when he grows up, he realizes that he has been the center of a secret society. And that society wants to keep him as a slave to the point where he is afraid to leave his bed. But it doesn't stop there. He is also given a job at a zoo, and the animal keeper is also afraid that he will leave him behind and will kill him. So the two of them try to get rid of the animal, but their plan backfires. "Le Petit Prince" is a good movie. It has some interesting moments, some wonderful scenes, and some serious moments as well. It's a bit of a slow movie, but it does have a great ending. It's one of those movies that you can watch over and over again. I think that it's a must see for anyone who likes movies about animals or French culture. It's also a great movie for anyone who likes the L'Atelier style. The movie is very beautiful to look at, and the actors do a great job. I can't say that it's a great movie, but it's a good movie. 7/10

Christopher A. photo
Christopher A.

In 1963, A.M. N. Yavneff, a young student at Columbia University, leaves his dormitory and travels to New York City to join his brother, Danny, in a study group at the famed Columbia University. In New York, he begins to see a young woman named Jessica, played by a young, hot-headed Jennifer Lopez, who has become a prostitute. The two are soon arrested by the New York police and placed in a mental hospital, where they are to be examined by Dr. James N. Dreyfuss, played by the highly acclaimed and charismatic actor Robert De Niro. Dr. Dreyfuss is a realist, a man who believes that people are born evil and that they are doomed to be criminals and deviants. In the hospital, Danny meets with a young prostitute named Molly, played by the beautiful Angelina Jolie, who has become a prostitute after becoming a student at Columbia. Danny is not sure whether he should trust Molly, who he believes to be a prostitute, or the doctor who is treating him. Although Danny is a realist, he finds the more he sees of Molly, the more he comes to believe that she is not a prostitute, but a free-thinking individual. He soon becomes friends with Molly, and in return, she starts to trust Danny. But when Danny and Molly meet again, they are drawn into a series of bizarre events, involving a crime and murder, that leads them to believe that they are the prime suspects in the case. I enjoyed this film because of the performances by Robert De Niro and Angelina Jolie, who is a great actress. It is also a great film because of the situations and the overall atmosphere. The movie is highly entertaining, and although it is a crime story, it is still a story that could have happened in the 1950's. Also, the movie is based on true events. However, it is a good movie, but it is not the best movie I have ever seen. It is not a movie that will be remembered in the years to come. 7/10

Jeffrey Thomas photo
Jeffrey Thomas

In 1951, the political and social unrest in Mexico was reaching a boiling point, and the world was in a panic. This was the time when the US had the world's largest oil reserves and the Soviet Union was a superpower, but both countries were deeply involved in the war in Vietnam. Now, in the early 1950s, both countries were fighting a war against the other in a part of the world that had never seen it before. In Mexico, the revolution was still going on. And the political instability and the civil war that was raging there was a fact that was well known in the US. The movie shows how this war affected the whole country. The violence was intense and the people were not willing to give up their political views. As a result, they were persecuted and killed. The government of the US, on the other hand, was showing how they would end the war in Vietnam. The movie shows how this film is a realistic portrayal of the events of that time and that people should know about it. The acting in the movie was great. The characters are so well portrayed that you could easily identify with them. The cast was made up of many famous actors, but also a few very famous actors who didn't have much screen time. This is a must see movie. It's a very interesting story and I recommend it to everyone. It's a very interesting story that will have you wondering about what is going to happen next.

Crystal P. photo
Crystal P.

I'll admit I didn't know a great deal about him when I first saw this movie. It was the same for me when I saw his other films. However, he is now a household name and I've seen quite a few of his movies and this is by far his best movie. The movie starts off with a bit of a slow start, but it soon picks up and the story quickly goes through a series of events. I think that the main theme of the movie is to show how corrupt the American government was back then and how their actions can be undone by those with good intentions. It's one thing to see how corrupt the government was back then, but it's another to see how corrupt the politicians are now. It's also interesting to see how some of the people in the film really believed that they were helping the poor and that they would be able to change the government. The movie also shows the people that were running the show back then and how they manipulated the people to do what they wanted. I really enjoyed this movie and I think that it is definitely a must see.

Scott photo
Scott

I remember watching this film when it was in the theater. It was a great film, and the acting was good. It's hard to remember that this film is from the 70's. But this film is so good because of the music. I remember hearing this music on the radio when I was a kid, and I remember hearing this music on the radio when I was a kid. The music was really good, and the acting was great. I thought this was a good film, and I have not seen it since. I have seen this film a couple of times, but I still remember the music, the acting, and the story line. This film is a classic.

Christina photo
Christina

One of the great tragedies of the 20th century was the so-called "conspiracy of silence" of the intelligence agencies, the CIA, FBI and the Secret Service. In the US, the intelligence community never had to explain anything to the American people, until the late 1970s. This was a period of moral and legal impunity, when anyone who had a problem with the US government could do anything, including lying to the FBI and lying to the CIA, and if they were caught, the consequences would be mild. The CIA did not even have to testify in court, but it could go to jail for perjury, and that was the end of the line for the agency. What we have today is a much different situation. If the CIA has a problem with the President, or with a politician, or with a judge, or with the general public, they can turn the American people into a huge target. And that is what happened to Oliver Stone, and to Peter Berg, and to Ben Kingsley, and to all the other actors in this movie. And that is why this movie is so great. Because it is an intelligent movie, with some really funny parts. The plot is very well written, and the acting is very good, with the exception of two actors who seem to be trying too hard to be funny. The other actors are good, and they deserve an Oscar. I was amazed to see the English version, because the subtitles were very helpful, especially for the second half of the movie. The movie is very violent, and it is very sad to see how much violence is being used to frighten the American people. But, as I said, it is a great movie, and I recommend it to anyone who wants to know more about the CIA, or who wants to see something really entertaining. It is not meant to be taken seriously, but it is an entertaining movie, and I recommend it to anyone.

Eugene photo
Eugene

This movie is a masterpiece of Hollywood, the director, the writers and the entire cast is the best I've ever seen. This movie is a must-see, if not a masterpiece. The characters are incredible, the story is brilliant, and the characters themselves are really convincing. It's a great movie, the only problem is, it's so much more than a movie. It's a poem, a myth, a tragedy, a love story, a comedy, a tragedy, a drama, a drama, a thriller, a comedy, a drama, a tragedy. Everything, it's just so much. The movie is more than a movie, it's a masterpiece, and that's the main thing I can say about it. The main reason I've rated it a 7, is because of the very low score on IMDb. I think that a 7 is the best I can give it. I've been watching this movie for years, and I've never seen anything like it. This movie is an 8/10.

Kathryn Stevens photo
Kathryn Stevens

This is an excellent film about a very sad and violent episode in Argentine history. It is set in the 1930's and tells the story of an insane and vicious murderer who murdered four young girls. He was sent to prison but he got out and killed one of the women. He then killed another woman. It is a very graphic film. The acting is great. Also, the film has some interesting and powerful scenes. The film has been remade several times and it is always good. The film has an excellent cast. It is a good film and worth watching.