Watch Emma.


Emma. is a movie starring Anya Taylor-Joy, Johnny Flynn, and Mia Goth. In 1800s England, a well meaning but selfish young woman meddles in the love lives of her friends.

Other Titles
Ema, 艾瑪., Έμμα, Emma
Running Time
2 hours 4 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Comedy, Drama
Autumn de Wilde
Eleanor Catton, Jane Austen
Johnny Flynn, Angus Imrie, Anya Taylor-Joy, Mia Goth
Audio Languages
English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

In 1800s England, a well meaning but selfish young woman meddles in the love lives of her friends.

Comments about comedy «Emma.» (23)

Beverly Lee photo
Beverly Lee

Let's be honest: every time you see a lesbian couple in a movie, you immediately want to see the movie to the fullest extent. Of course, you have to be in a romantic mood, because it's a lesbian movie! But if you're not, then I would recommend this movie for a nice comedy. There is some lesbian-like humor, such as "I'm a lesbian", the dumb boyfriend of the girl and the lesbians' way of getting revenge on the boyfriend, and some of the scene's are quite erotic. All in all, a nice movie for couples to laugh at and watch!

Amanda photo

When Emma first meets Tony, they are both in search of a girlfriend. On her way to a party, Emma is kidnapped by her ex-boyfriend's boyfriend, and the search for a new guy is on. The film begins with Tony and Emma talking about their life. After the party, the movie jumps to Emma and Tony's life. What happens in between is a tale of love and the power of distraction. The movie is beautifully shot, with beautiful subjects and scenes, and wonderful music. The actors do a fine job. I think they do a fine job, but the script is very complex, and I would say the movie is too long. I think it would have been better if the movie started with Tony and Emma in their lives, and then the movie would go through Emma's life. It would have been a more interesting story. The movie is a good movie, but the movie could have been better. It is a good movie, but it could have been a great movie.

Bryan photo

Really just a weird, odd film about a man who falls in love with a mentally retarded woman. There are some funny moments and some creepy moments. The characters are all fun, and it is nice to see a British film about a mentally disabled woman.

Louis photo

This film is quite a good look at a life in two homes. The two girls were the same age when they lived with their parents and for most of the film, the main characters are the same age. The father is a alcoholic and the mother a drug addict. What will happen when the parents have an argument and the daughter decides to leave? Who will go with her? Can she make it through the next day without becoming another statistic? There are some wonderful shots of the Los Angeles area. This film is not for everyone but those who are interested in the lives of high school students will find much to enjoy. The only thing missing is the death of one of the two girls.

Randy photo

It is ironic that it was a woman, the modern one, that went up in the church hierarchy by achieving a certain level of success, hence her ultimate condemnation of a women's magazine, the "Vanity Fair". If the media was a danger, the women who wrote for it were doing a terrible job of silencing the men. The latter of course included "Frankie" (a self-proclaimed feminist, with a libido just like the other ladies of the magazine, with a penchant for sex that would make most of the guys turn their heads as they moved to the "Sex and the City" or "Sex and the City 2" type of movie) and the same old story of a film maker who's movie got shot down for its presumed "sexism" (which she later explained that it was the "feminists" who complained and tried to sabotage her film, which is, in any event, beside the point. They were just complaining that they didn't get the money for the film). Not that I blame the feminist critics for how this film went over. My only problems with it was that it was too long, and not enough of a story. I would have been more interested in seeing how this film became a best-seller. I do like the acting and the attention to detail of the movie, but there is too much of a story going on to keep the viewer interested. I did not find the story very interesting, and, except for a couple of very interesting scenes, it's hard to keep your attention on. I could have done without the nudity, too, but I suppose that wasn't very important to a movie. As for the movie itself, the ratings here are a little off the mark. The ratings I have seen here are somewhat closer to the movie's true rating, but I doubt that those are very high. So if you are going to see it, I recommend to take it with a grain of salt, because it might be good for one viewing only.

Matthew Pena photo
Matthew Pena

A very good film for all lovers of the West Indian genre. Its like the first film but much better. Its best used as a reference for the first one. Maybe it would have been more successful had it been released in 1972 rather than in 2002. This is a good film with a good story and a great ending. It could have been a better film if only its subjects had been dealt with in a more convincing manner. More believable than the first one. Its not meant to be taken seriously. It just is a good movie and definitely worth watching.

Charles photo

I gave it 7, mostly because it had some amazing acting. But that's not enough to make up for a terrible screenplay and some of the worst writing ever. I don't know how the writers and actors got along in the first place, but at least they got along for the first half of the movie. I think the biggest problem with this movie was that it tried to make the love story between Emma and Dylan (Liam Neeson) into some sort of epic epic love story. It made it hard to care about any of the characters, and it ruined the movie for me. I guess the only reason I stayed through the entire film was to see how long it took the writer/director to realize they had a bad script and let that be the ONLY reason I stayed. The guy should have just made it a straightforward love story. I didn't like the ending that much either. It was kind of underwhelming and not in a good way. I didn't like that they had to go to the "high school reunion" scene to end it. The ending would have worked better if they had just kept the film going to the point where they met, not ending it in the middle of the night in the woods and when they had just met. I just didn't like that. All in all, I didn't think this film was that bad. I still don't like it that much, but I was kind of surprised that I liked it at all. It's just a really bad movie. Don't bother with it.

Margaret G. photo
Margaret G.

I thought this was a good movie. The cinematography was excellent, and the acting was superb. The story and story-line was so funny and well written. This movie was a nice blend of drama and comedy. I have no idea how it ended, but it was definitely worth the time. I recommend this movie to anyone who likes to laugh and be entertained.

Walter photo

This movie is about a young girl who falls in love with a young boy but when she finds out he is a pedophile, she tries to get away from him. There are a lot of funny scenes. I think the best scenes are when she is in her apartment and the guy is watching TV. She is really good at playing stupid and just making a fool of herself. It is funny to see how she starts to love him and how she runs to a friend for help. The guy is a good guy and in the end he gets a chance to prove his love for her. I like the actors, I like the director and I like the story. I give this movie a 7 out of 10.

Jacob Bailey photo
Jacob Bailey

This is one of those movies that I am sure most people will either love or hate. It's not exactly a movie to sit back and watch, it's more of an experience, a way to feel something, to be affected by a movie that is not meant for watching. This is the case with The Fall, which is a pretty decent drama, it's no masterpiece by any means, but it's worth sitting back, taking in the story and watching the characters interact. I was a bit hesitant to give this movie a higher rating, but I am glad I did. I don't think I could have sat through this movie if it weren't for those five minutes that I saw her take her clothes off. I have to admit I wasn't expecting much out of this movie and I was pleasantly surprised. I can't say enough about the acting of everyone involved. Jennifer Lawrence is excellent in this movie, she has a natural sweetness and a bit of desperation to the character she plays, and the way she carried this role was almost perfect. I also thought Matthew McConaughey and Kate Winslet did an excellent job in this movie. There was a real chemistry between them. The story line was excellent, and I felt a bit emotionally invested. All in all, this is a good movie to watch. It's not one of those movies that you watch and you are satisfied with it, it's a movie that you watch for the experience and the reason to watch. If you don't like this movie, I really don't understand why you would be disappointed.

Ryan Black photo
Ryan Black

I will admit I wasn't expecting much from this movie. It's a film about the relationship between a middle-aged man and a young woman in their 30s. I've known a few of them before and I didn't think they were that interesting. But I'm glad I was wrong. This movie really gives you a sense of what those relationships are like, the painful moments, the intimacy of it all, the long hours and the hurt. There are so many great moments in the movie. It just goes to show that relationships are all about the journey. Whether or not you're in love or not, there are always ups and downs. I can't imagine anyone not being affected by this movie.

Marie photo

I'm a big fan of Sarah Polley, but I have to admit that she was a little lacking in this movie. She did well with the accent and wasn't forced into a forced role. She was also the lead in the movie, and I didn't think she was very convincing as a whore. And her character was very misfit, but I can't blame her for that. It is possible that this is what her character was going for, but she still didn't seem convincing. There are a lot of questions left unanswered in the movie, which is a shame, because they could have made the movie a lot more interesting. I'm giving it a 7 because I wanted to like it more than I did. It's a decent movie, but not the best I've seen.

Sarah photo

I found the film to be somewhat intense, especially the beginning. Unfortunately, I was very aware that I was watching a David Lynch film. I found the music very distracting at times, and I did not understand the theme for the credits. I had no idea that the film was supposed to be "inspired by" "American Psycho" until I started reading the summary on the back of the DVD box. I am very disappointed that David Lynch chose to end his story like this. I am a fan of his work, and I think he should have followed his own advice to film his film the way he wanted. The film was supposed to be "inspired" by "American Psycho", and I would like to see it as such. David Lynch also lost me with the ending, and I think he should have made a stronger ending. I would have loved to see an ending that could be considered a "twist". I am glad that I watched the film, but I am disappointed that David Lynch chose to end it that way. Overall, I think that "Brick" was a very good movie. I think the actors and actresses did a great job, but I think the film was a bit overrated. I would not recommend this film to anyone. I thought it was an interesting movie, but not as good as I thought it would be. I rate this film 7/10.

Marilyn photo

Shakespeare in Love is a beautiful film. The play is beautifully shot and the storyline is well-handled. The performances are also impressive. Maggie Smith shines as the titular character. I thought her performance was over-the-top and that she acted way too many emotions for a movie of this type, but I understand the decision. Overall, this is a great movie. I recommend it to anyone who loves Shakespeare, or anyone who has been to Oxford. -ABIGAIL WILLIAMS-

Brenda W. photo
Brenda W.

I love Emma Stone and love the book that this movie was based on. The movie has many other Hollywood trappings but it's all done with real thought. It takes its time developing characters and story lines. The movie is a bit slow at times but it is well worth watching. I think I will watch the book to see if it lives up to the movie. Overall I give it a 7/10.

Roy Adams photo
Roy Adams

As far as I'm concerned this is one of the better David O. Russell films. In fact I find it even more of a Nolan film than in the Dark Knight, and I think that's a very good thing. The actors are great and they all do a great job. Jessica Chastain was excellent as the 'crystal' girl who has a problem with a very strong voice. I especially liked her accent. She did it so well and it was as if she was actually 'acting'. I think it's a good sign when the director doesn't rely on some special effects to make up for a lack of acting. All in all a good film that I recommend.

Roy photo

If you like the movies "Pulp Fiction", "Taxi Driver", "Dressed to Kill" and "Ghost", you should see this movie. It is well-acted by many famous actors and actresses, but that's not the best thing about it. It is the soundtrack which is the most important part of the movie. It is a great "kick-ass" soundtrack, which is catchy, memorable and has a great mixture of modern electronic music. The ending song "Fly", which is part of the "Besotted" series, is very effective. It is a well-done musical with good music. The story is kind of simple, but there are some funny scenes. It is a decent movie to see for all who like "Kung Fu" movies. 7/10

Harry Y. photo
Harry Y.

I liked this movie. It had a good story and the characters were very unique. A good deal of the movie was set in the past, with flashbacks. There were interesting points that were made, and they were fun to watch. Some things I liked about the movie were the music that was used, and the fashion. This movie is not for everyone, and some people may not like the style. Some of the jokes were a little hard to make, and I think there could have been a little more jokes about a couple of the characters. Also, the movie is not for children, or just for those that like stories with a good amount of suspense, they will like this movie. I think the first half of the movie could have been done better, and I think the movie would have been better if it had been better written. I think the ending was a little confusing, but it ended well. All in all, this is a good movie, and I would recommend it to anyone who has never watched it, and for those that have watched it, it is worth watching.

Sandra photo

First I'd like to say I did not know that this film was being made at all. I'd seen it's trailer and thought it was about a girl who had her brother killed. That's about it, the film itself is about a group of characters from a few days in the life of a high school class who suddenly find themselves at the bottom of the food chain, dealing with, well, everyone. This may seem like a typical film, but it is truly unique in how it manages to both portray a group of students as being brash and tough and at the same time to show that the film can be an interesting and thought provoking piece of film. One of the greatest things about the film is how the film manages to offer a glimpse into what life is like for a group of students who are in for something very serious, but it is also that the film is able to manage to give a realistic sense of what life is like for these students. So what does this film offer? Well in a nutshell, there are the normal traits of high school students, the drama of life, the snobby ones, and the pathetic ones. So it's not really that many different groups of people, just that there are different types of people. One of the things I loved about the film was how it handled what happened in the end of the movie, so it was able to give a good sense of how the movie ends without making the audience feel like they've wasted their time. Overall, I thought it was a great film and I would recommend it to anyone who wants to see a great story about school and life.

Madison photo

I saw this film at the Barbican in London. The theatre was packed, and the audience was split on the first half hour. It is difficult to comment on the acting of the main character because it is based on a book which is one of my favourite novels of all time. The acting is decent, and the story is well told, although it is not all that original. The story is very similar to one of my all time favourite books, Catch-22, which was adapted to the screen. But where Catch-22 was slightly off, this film was slightly better. The writing is more realistic and you feel that you are really there with the characters. The action is more gripping. In the book, the movie was filmed in the same way, but this did not add to the film. Overall, the acting was decent and the story was not all that original. The action was not too well done. The writing was very realistic, however, the acting was average.

Patrick Russell photo
Patrick Russell

Johannes Vermeer's Vermeer (2006) is a straightforward story that has been told so many times before. So many times that it is become an old story. The story is based on the famous work of 19th century artist Johann Sebastian Bach, and stars Nicolas Cage as a refugee, living in Paris, who is saved from deportation to Germany by a friend. He is then sent to a monastery to be a German monk. When he returns, he is forced to go to court and is put in a convent where he eventually learns about the life of the 14th century. He also gets to know that the real world is a beautiful, grand, fantastic place. The life of the 14th century may have been beautiful, but it was also painful. It was a period of turmoil, of tremendous change, and the life of this man is a testimony of this. The story follows the struggles and disappointments of Vermeer as he works to discover his own life. The story does not seem to make much sense, but it is still a very interesting movie. It is very slow at first, but it eventually picks up, and there is no bad acting. The movie does not seem to have a clear direction. It keeps you guessing as to what is going to happen. The movie could have been better had it been longer and done more of a character study. But it is still worth watching.

Nicole Hanson photo
Nicole Hanson

I was really surprised by this movie. I had no expectations at all. The trailers gave a generic message, what they were doing was basically the opposite of what we actually want to see. The main character was good, but I really didn't think she had much to do. The movie showed that not all humans are bad. I would like to see a movie with the same story line, but better. I think this could have been a really good movie, but it was just really good. I liked the characters, I liked the story, I liked the acting, but the characters were pretty bad. I am a big fan of Emma Watson, so I didn't like her too much. I am really disappointed in this movie, but I think I can take it. I am giving it a 7/10, it was better than I expected.

Gary Phillips photo
Gary Phillips

The girl was fantastic. (Nicole Kidman) I was expecting some sort of breakdown and a woman power message. She turned out to be this young woman who had everything going for her except the perfect life for her to live. The camera work was beautiful and the characters were good. But the "plot" was thin. I really felt that there was no point to the movie. I didn't know why the guy had such an obsession. When he found out he made his girlfriend run away. It seemed like a simple solution to be running away. But it wasn't. The movie dragged on and on and on. There were some scenes that were really well done. I can see why it got a few awards. I just wished that it had gone a lot deeper. Maybe that would have been a good idea. I don't think I will go see it again.