Watch Rapid Response

Rapid Response

Rapid Response is a movie starring Stephen Olvey, Terry Trammell, and Mario Andretti. In 1966 Medical student and racing fan Stephen Olvey gets the opportunity of a lifetime when he is asked to volunteer at the Indianapolis 500 on...

Running Time
1 hours 39 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Michael William Miles, Roger Hinze
Stephen Olvey, Mario Andretti, Terry Trammell, Bobby Unser
Audio Languages
English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

In 1966 Medical student and racing fan Stephen Olvey gets the opportunity of a lifetime when he is asked to volunteer at the Indianapolis 500 on their medical team. What started as fun insider view of a sport he loved quickly devolves before his eyes as he sees the level of medical support given to the drivers, whom he has befriended, is terrifyingly non-existent. After feeling helpless at the scene of what turns out to be a fatal accident. Dr. Olvey sets off on a mission to build a team to apply science to transform motorsports from the most fatal form of sport to one of the safest. Over the next 30 years they succeed and the science that they develop influences modern trauma medicine and the passenger cars we drive today. This is the story of the most fatal era in Motorsports and the Indy 500 doctors who pioneered safety and helped the drivers to cheat death.

Comments about documentary «Rapid Response» (14)

Mark B. photo
Mark B.

I was very impressed by this documentary. While it may be hard to put into words what happened to a family during the years after the bombing, it's easy to see how this family was affected by the events. It was interesting to see how the family interacted with the media, the different police agencies, the local churches, and the diocese. I would recommend this to anyone who wants to learn more about what happened to this family.

Phillip Chapman photo
Phillip Chapman

I know people have been complaining about the cover art on this movie. I don't know why, but I thought it was pretty cool. It gives a very different feel to the movie. I'm not sure why that was, but I liked it. I think that it's an important point for people to understand that people like me, or even the president himself, will never understand the culture of one of the countries we do business with. I think this movie does a great job of making that point. I think the movie did a great job of making the point that this is the way of the world, and we can't understand the culture of another country without the culture of our own country. It's a great movie. I'm glad to see it's getting more recognition.

Lori photo

I've seen several interviews with Army Sargent, Staff Sergeant, Private First Class, Lance Corporal, Charlie Kuhn, and I was surprised to learn that he is not only an intelligent man, but a well-educated man with a doctorate degree in military history. While we hear his views on the events surrounding the shootings at Fort Hood, Texas, the film is mostly focused on his opinions of the military, and how he sees the United States of America. He gives a history of the United States of America in military history, and describes the history of the military as it relates to the U.S. government and military. I thought it was a very well-done documentary, but it was an interesting presentation of military history, not a perfect documentary, but worth seeing.

Ruth D. photo
Ruth D.

With a film like this one, a good film has to be both emotionally engaging and entertaining. This one is both. The story of a small town in Minnesota is told from the perspective of one family who are currently dealing with the loss of their daughter. I've heard people say that the film is boring, or that it doesn't have any "tense" or "moments". The answer is both. The first part of the film was the most interesting because the focus was on one family's thoughts and feelings towards the loss of their daughter. It was heart wrenching, and the ending left you thinking about what you've seen. The second part of the film is the boring parts. It's just a bunch of people talking about nothing. It's boring, and it doesn't make you feel any emotions. It's just the same boring news stories, and people saying "that's what happened" over and over again. The film is one of those documentaries that's really good, but it's just boring. I'd recommend it if you like this type of film, but I wouldn't recommend it to people who are into suspense films, or those who like documentaries. I give it an 8 out of 10.

Michelle photo

For those of us who have spent years on Capitol Hill working to reform the health care system, it's hard to imagine how something so obviously flawed could be fixed. The state of the health care system is one of the most important issues of our time, and this film is a must-see for anyone who wants to understand what's going on. The film's real story is that of the 9/11 rescue of the American doctor working in Iraq. But it's also a good reminder of why we need to fix our health care system. As with all good films, the most powerful part comes from the actors and director, who really know their subject. This film shows us that the problems of health care and health care systems can be overcome. The people who made this film should be proud of their work.

Michelle Richardson photo
Michelle Richardson

In the first hour, I was a bit disappointed with the lack of humor. A bit too generic. After that, I really got into it. It was like I was watching the same film. Very gripping. The fact that it was a documentary was great. No one had a voice, and no one had any power. They were all so simple and simple and simple. They were just normal people trying to live a normal life. I was watching this film and thinking, "Well, that's really depressing." But after a while, I realized that I was watching the same movie, and this documentary really brought it home. I thought I was watching a documentary. The documentary is fascinating. I was impressed with it. I was hoping for some really funny moments, but it wasn't that. It was more like a documentary, and a really, really, really good documentary. This documentary will not make you laugh, but it will make you think. I give this film a 10 out of 10.

Dorothy Banks photo
Dorothy Banks

I got a chance to view this at the Venice Film Festival and was blown away. This movie is both shocking and wonderful. The first part of the film is a compilation of interviews with various people, but in the second part it is a tribute to the human spirit and the values of love. It is a wonderful film that deserves to be seen by as many people as possible. You won't be disappointed.

Frank B. photo
Frank B.

The late American actor Robert Redford stars as the late Jimmy Dean (sic) Greene, a young man who committed suicide on April 15, 1992, in Oak Park, Michigan. Greene was born in India, and brought up in a Catholic home. He was a charismatic figure, and was one of the most popular people in Oak Park. Greene had a good heart, and wanted to help the poor and downtrodden. In 1991, he began to hear about the problems in Oak Park, and became determined to find out how to do something about it. Greene worked as a reporter for a magazine, and eventually wrote a book on Oak Park's problems. The book became a best seller, and the media began to focus on the problems in Oak Park. Greene's efforts led to a series of national articles, and local media and community leaders began to take notice. Greene also met with politicians and community leaders. He also was involved in a campaign to have the city, and the school system, improve the environment in Oak Park. His efforts culminated in a major effort to save Oak Park Elementary School, and to provide better educational opportunities for the children. Greene was a highly respected figure in Oak Park, and his death in 1992 was felt by all. However, Greene's death did not bring much relief to the community. It took until 1999 for the residents of Oak Park to be able to move on from their grief. Greene's death also brought the community closer together. After a lengthy memorial service in December 1999, the community was finally able to move on. Oak Park is now a community of all races, religions, and backgrounds. The children of the community are now able to attend school, and live in a city that has a vibrant spirit. The town has also experienced a change of spirit. Today, the people of Oak Park are proud of their history and heritage. They are proud to have a place where people from all walks of life can come together and create a better future for themselves and their children.

Carl photo

I saw the first half of this movie last week at the Minneapolis Film Festival and was very surprised to see it was being shown in the early afternoon. I liked the movie and am looking forward to seeing it again. I am an artist and found the movie very interesting. I was especially impressed with the way the director captured the feeling of being stuck in a place that doesn't know what to do with you. I thought the movie also went a long way to help people in a similar situation to what the film was about. I also think that the movie helps people understand the power of art and the importance of letting the artist tell his or her story. It's a great movie and I recommend it.

Donald photo

I have no idea what people are talking about. I have watched "The Fast and the Furious" (for the first time) and "Speed" (for the second time). The first one was good but the second one was the worst. I think it was the same problem. People are always trying to pick apart the movies, saying how bad it is, how bad the acting is, etc. But it is just a movie, nothing more. There are many good movies out there, so how can you not like them? I was completely bored by the first movie, but I have not been this bored by a movie in a long time. I watched the movie twice in the theatre and still had not had a good time. My friends and I were laughing our heads off, and were laughing because the jokes were just not funny. We had to leave the theatre. I think it is better to watch the movie for what it is. A vehicle for car chases and explosions. We are not talking about an art film. The car chases are great, and the explosions are great. But they are not funny, so it is not really worth the time to sit through the movie for the laughs. And it is not really about the car chases, so it is not really about the explosions. I think they need to put in some lines from the first movie, something like "That was the stupidest thing I have ever seen in my entire life. I would never do that again". That would be more funny and I think that would have made it funnier. But I am guessing that was just what they were going for. There are some good points. The acting is very good. I really liked Paul Walker. He was very funny. The other actors did a good job as well. But the director and the writers did a terrible job, and that is why they have to apologize to the people who have been waiting for this movie. I think the best thing they could have done is to put in some lines from the first movie. I will probably be very disappointed if they don't, because they were trying to be funny and failed, but I think it is good that they did put some lines in there. I think they should have gone the whole way with the jokes. I would have liked to see a little more, maybe like from the second movie. I think they should have cut the second movie down to something like an hour and a half. Then they could have made it a short movie. Then the jokes would have been funny. I would have liked to see a little more of Paul Walker, but he was very funny. I think that it was a terrible movie, but

Matthew Anderson photo
Matthew Anderson

This is a very good documentary that I believe will get some people interested in the subject of drone warfare. The director, Chris Woods, has made an excellent job of showing the problems involved in the use of drones. He also shows the incredible job that the US military is doing in the area of precision strikes, including the use of "drones" to assassinate individuals. This documentary shows the aftermath of the American war on Afghanistan and Pakistan and what we have learned since the fall of the Taliban. The subjects interviewed are all credible experts on the subject. However, the film does not include any discussion of the ethics of using the drones for killing. In the words of a guest, the U.S. military is "first and foremost, an assassination machine." The American public is being duped into supporting the drone program because it is seen as a necessary step in our quest for global domination. If you believe in a better world, you will want to see this documentary.

Nathan K. photo
Nathan K.

This is a very good movie. I really like the way the director tells the story. I think the story is very important in movies. The story is about how a young boy gets into trouble with the local gang and how he tries to help them and even get involved with them. The gang leader is played by real gang members and the story is about how they think about the police and the way they think about the people that they consider criminals. The director does a good job at showing the gang life in that part of the world. The story is very interesting and I can watch the movie over and over again and learn something. I really think that this is a very good movie that I will always watch. If you like movies that are about people who don't fit into society, then I think this is a movie for you.

Nathan M. photo
Nathan M.

This movie was great! It's about a guy named Sean, who's job is to go to the cinema every Sunday night and record the conversations of the cinema patrons, and then transmit them to the people at the cinema who decide whether or not they want to go to the cinema the next day. Sean is a very interesting character. He's an introvert, who is always nervous and says very little. He doesn't talk much, but he talks a lot. He's kind of a nerdy guy. He's really nice, and really understands what people want from their cinema, and he understands what people want from the cinema. But he's also a nerd, who wants to talk about nothing but cinema. He's very nice, and he's a real character. He's not an evil guy, he's just a really good guy. And he's not nice either, he's just very nice. It's a very well made movie. I love this movie, and I think it's very good, and I think it's very important that people learn about cinema, and about cinema in general. And I think it's a very important movie for cinema lovers. It's a really good movie. I think it's great.

Keith photo

If you liked the book, I recommend the movie. The book was very, very good, and they kept to the story very well. The movie did a good job at keeping to the book. The movie was entertaining, but I do think it could have been better. The movie left out some things that the book did not. If you are a fan of the book, and you haven't read the book, it would be a good idea to read the book first before watching the movie. If you are a fan of the movie, then you will probably enjoy the book better than the movie.