Watch Truth


Truth is a movie starring Cate Blanchett, Robert Redford, and Dennis Quaid. Newsroom drama detailing the 2004 CBS 60 Minutes report investigating then-President George W. Bush's military service, and the subsequent firestorm of...

Other Titles
Der Moment der Wahrheit, La verdad, Η αλήθεια, Gizli Dosya, Truth: Il prezzo della verità, 真相急先鋒, Conspiración y Poder, ニュースの真相, Emet, Verdade, Sólo la verdad, Conspiração e Poder, Igazság - A CBS-botrány, Conspiración y poder, Vérité, Truth: Le prix de la vérité
Running Time
2 hours 5 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Biography, Drama, History
James Vanderbilt
James Vanderbilt, Mary Mapes
Elisabeth Moss, Robert Redford, Cate Blanchett, Dennis Quaid
Australia, USA
Audio Languages
English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

Newsroom drama detailing the 2004 CBS 60 Minutes report investigating then-President George W. Bush's military service, and the subsequent firestorm of criticism that cost anchor Dan Rather and producer Mary Mapes their careers.

Comments about biography «Truth» (28)

Kyle photo

I am a huge Star Wars fan. I don't like them so much anymore because I grew up watching them. So it is great to see them come back to life again. The story itself is not very original and there are a lot of flaws in the story, but if you don't want to have to think about these problems you can have fun with this movie. It is a little bit long, but it is a very well made movie. I hope that people go see it because it is a great movie. I can only hope that it won't be the last one. I hope they do a good job with Episode III and IV.

Daniel Pena photo
Daniel Pena

I just watched "Our Brand is Crisis", and while the film isn't the greatest film I've seen (many films have a higher rating), it's one of the best documentaries I've seen. The acting is great, the setting is beautiful, and the message of the film is right on the mark. The main criticism I have of the film is that the storyline is very predictable, but this is only a minor point. It's just as a lot of the film as you can predict and, if you do, it's only because of the choices the characters have made. There's just something in the way the film's narrative is written that keeps you in suspense and on the edge of your seat. It's one of the most engrossing films I've seen, and I highly recommend it to anyone who wants to learn more about politics and who's interested in how America has been used for other countries' benefit. The most important thing to know about the movie is that, yes, it's based on a true story. It's a documentary that takes place in 1996, but it's important to remember that the main character isn't the President of the United States, so the events portrayed in the film are not based on a real event. Overall, "Our Brand is Crisis" is one of the best documentaries I've ever seen and, with the political turmoil of the present, I feel it's an important film for anyone interested in American politics and history.

Billy photo

Auf der Himmel - about the vilest crimes of the Nazi regime - is a big German film produced by the German Films Corporation, and directed by the legendary Ingmar Bergman, so the following is pretty much a given. But what is missing is an enjoyable story. In spite of the usual Bergman idiosyncrasies, this film is really the first real Bergman film in that it really is the least Bergmanesque of his films. Bergman is probably the most complete director of cinema. It's not difficult to imagine a film by Bergman, and it's equally easy to imagine a film that is more than Bergman's style. But there are enough plot twists and surprises, and some good performances, to make this worth a look. The subject is a bit difficult to take. It's a crime movie, and that can easily turn to being a bit of a polemical one. There are some interesting moments, and some good characters in it, but it is definitely not a straight-forward story of one man's struggle against the Nazi regime. It's actually very much about a man's struggle with himself. The name of the movie is not a coincidence. It's a bit of a misnomer, because the director wanted to avoid the Nazis. It's not an accurate representation of the era. The Nazi regime is still used as a symbol of how evil humans can be. And that is something Bergman was well aware of. This is not a movie about a man who seeks to fight the system, or a movie about the Nazis. It's a film about the artist. It's not a movie about the times. And it's a film about the person he is. In the first half, it's very personal. The scenes of the concentration camp are very intense and it is really very hard to watch the film with eyes closed. But it is really a moving movie, and it is very important that it does work in the end. That's not Bergman's style, but it's also not a problem. Bergman is a man who thought that a film should be a little bit open about itself. He always wanted to show something outside the rules of the genre. And the fact that he made a film about the Germans, who are shown as the bad guys, and the hero, who is a man who is actually fighting for justice, is an important aspect of the movie. In the end, the Nazis are the villains, and it is just a question of the individual who is actually fighting for his own freedom. It is not an easy movie, but it is not difficult to watch, and it is certainly worth a watch.

Brandon photo

Historical drama about the events leading up to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. This film follows young reporter Jack Kennedy, a child of the late Senator Robert F. Kennedy, as he leaves for Texas, where he hopes to become a newspaper reporter, only to learn that the Senator has died. During this period, Kennedy is also growing up as the people of Texas are preparing to elect the first black President of the United States. Jackie Kennedy, the late Senator's wife, moves with her family to California to assume his duties as First Lady. When the first woman President is elected, Jackie is not at all happy. She has to stay in Washington and sees no future for her children. The young reporter, who is to become the future president of the United States, struggles to come to terms with his situation and what he must do to make his life better. In the midst of all of this, Jack is also in an intense relationship with the beautiful and mysterious journalist Lucy, who does not understand him. Jackie is also married to a man who does not understand her. It is at this point that Jackie makes a decision that changes her life forever. The film is set during the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962. The setting in Texas is so beautifully filmed that you are drawn into the story and you care about all the characters. The film has a wonderful plot and fascinating story. The acting was outstanding and it did a great job at explaining the events that occurred. The actors were very believable. The best part of the film is the end. This film could have ended with Jack leaving for good, but it doesn't. Jackie is sent to the island and learns that her parents are not there and that her sister has been kidnapped. There is a great scene in the hospital where Jackie has to decide if she will stay and help Lucy or go with the FBI. She decides to go and they learn that the kidnapping was a hoax. The film is very good and is definitely worth seeing.

Julie Perez photo
Julie Perez

The controversy over the documentary "Proof of Heaven" is not surprising. It doesn't matter whether it is true or not, the point is that this film was made. There is a fairly high percentage of Christian believers who, like myself, think the film is utter crap and to call this movie a "whitewash" is absurd. I have no problem with the film's content or messages. It is based on a few well-documented anecdotes that should have been thoroughly investigated. Instead, we get a few paragraphs and a few clips of people quoting the Bible. The problem is that the Bible isn't necessarily the best source of information for our time. The real-life examples used in the film are either totally and entirely fictional or based on actual events. All of the facts, the quotations, and the ideas in the film are based on information collected by members of a Christian congregation, many of whom are practicing Christians. But that's not the point. In order to get something out of this film, you have to take it seriously. The director wants to say that the Bible is a good book, but not a complete one. I guess he means to say that it's true, but not that it's the only reliable source of information. That's fine. I can believe that a Catholic priest or a Methodist preacher believes in Jesus and will tell you why, or that a Hindu woman believes in Jesus and will explain why. But I can't believe that they are true. Some people believe that the Bible is not only totally inaccurate, but that it contains far more errors than it should. I have no problem with that. My problem is with the way that this film is presented. It is supposed to be about how the Christians of the past made their decisions, not how they are in the present. For example, we are told that certain Christians took a vow of silence from attending services until they found the right person. This would be understandable in a time when all Christians were trying to find the right person. In a more secular time, when religion was a mere footnote, it would be possible to make an argument that these people acted very irrational. If that was the case, they wouldn't have kept their vow. So the fact that the movie makes these arguments is to be expected. The problem is that these arguments are presented in a way that suggests that they are totally reasonable and that the Bible is perfect and reliable. This is not true. Even if the people in the movie were completely crazy, they would still have to be rational. The problem with this approach is that it does not lead to an investigation. The movie does not even try to show that these people were in a position to believe in the Bible, but rather that they believed in it. In other words, the documentary takes a perfectly rational person and shows them making irrational decisions. It's just a different way to present these arguments. Now the problem is that this is exactly the way that the real people in the story did. These are the people who were in a position to actually study the Bible and know what they believe, yet the film makers simply present them as rational. And so, while the real people were looking at the Bible, they were doing irrational things like worshipping pagan gods and mutilating holy books. The movie presents this as a rational way to handle things, but in reality, these people did things that were more irrational than rational. That is the problem with this approach. The documentary shows them as doing something rational, but in fact, they did something irrational. The problem with this film is that it simply doesn't do a good job of making a point. The film does not give us enough information to make us think about these decisions. It presents them as a logical choice, but we don't get the sense that they were rational decisions. To summarize, the film fails as a documentary because it is

Helen C. photo
Helen C.

It was a cool movie to see. If you liked "The Sound Of Music" or "The Deer Hunter" then you will like this movie. "The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou" is a heart wrenching love story. It is hard to put it into words because the movie is just that good. If you like the story line then you will like this movie.

Jacqueline G. photo
Jacqueline G.

The Pope's trip to Rome is one of the major focuses of the film "Life is Beautiful". It's a tour-de-force from the great director, Steven Spielberg. "Life is Beautiful" chronicles Pope John Paul II's epic trip to the Vatican in the summer of 2003. The trip is intended to demonstrate how the world can be touched by the Church's many teachings. The film uses many of the trappings of the trip. We are treated to photos, stories, and music from the trip. We are also shown a version of a musical from "Rome." The music is a testament to the musical talents of George Harrison. The Pope is well suited for the role. As one would expect, the film is not a great success. It's not a good film. I can't really find anything positive to say about it. I find it frustrating that the filmmakers felt the need to use so many historical facts in the film, and not even mention the need for historical accuracy. The film itself is uninspired and lifeless. I'm not a fan of John Krasinski. He has made some great films, but I can't say I'm a fan. The music is horrible. The best part of the film was the music. It was the best part of the film. It's just a shame that the film itself is bad. I also didn't enjoy the CGI, which I think was a huge flaw. The music was beautiful, but that's about it. "Life is Beautiful" is a great film, but it is not one that I would recommend.

Katherine Carroll photo
Katherine Carroll

It is not difficult to understand the deep feelings which Walter Krivitsky felt towards Hitler in 1934. One of the great lies told by the Nazis was that their aims were not in the destruction of the Jews. This idea was very much present in his mind. He was not against the Jews, but he believed that if the Jews did not come to power, the Germans would not be able to kill them. At the same time he was against the Communists, because they wanted to undermine his power and were therefore not of his concern. This was the main reason why he chose to create an anti-Communist group in St. Petersburg in 1934. The fact that his ideas were in complete opposition to the beliefs of the Communists is a disgrace to the memory of this great writer and one which I regret. The film is a clever and interesting study of this time in his life and how his ideas were absorbed in the minds of the people of the Russian empire. This is an excellent film and I think that people who are interested in this period in Russia and its people will find it interesting. The film begins with an amazing tour through St. Petersburg and the very intriguing story of Walter's anti-communist group. The way the story develops is very interesting and fascinating. The discussion of the crimes of the Nazis is also very interesting. I liked this film a lot and it will be the last one I see from Andrei Konchalovsky.

Jacob Lucas photo
Jacob Lucas

I like and have liked Oliver Stone's work since Fahrenheit 9/11, and the film still holds up very well today. I remember being somewhat shocked when I first heard about the film being made, having only been exposed to a few snippets of it. However, I decided to watch it, knowing that I would be shocked, shocked to learn that Stone would direct and star in this film. I was very surprised at how much I liked the film, having been familiar with his work. The story, which was based on a true story, centers around a man named Adolf Hitler. During World War II, the German dictator made a vow to make Germany great again, and make it great once more. This film focuses on the idea of what made Hitler so great and what drove him to such a diabolical hatred for his opponents. This film tells the story of a German boxer named Adolph Hitler, played by Richard Chamberlain, who at the time was a relatively unknown boxer, not even having done any boxing before World War II. After the war, Hitler became very popular as a boxer, and, with the help of his wife, became very wealthy. He decided to try and make Germany great again, which was just beginning to be made by the Allies, so he went on a tour of various countries to promote the idea. This is when the Nazis started to receive heavy criticism, mostly because of their brutal treatment of the Jews, so they started to try and ban boxing, and make it illegal. They had the National Socialist Party, and they used the book and film "Mein Kampf" to create their ideology, which would lead to the Holocaust. Hitler was responsible for a lot of the horrors of the war, and he became more and more insane and violent. He convinced himself that he was the greatest of all time, and that he was a hero for the "Adolf Hitler Youth", which the Nazis believed was the most perfect race of all time. Adolf Hitler was supposed to be the great savior, but he became a man who hated and used the Jews. I thought that the portrayal of the dictator in the film was very accurate and it was very moving. The character was convincing and did not change much during the film. The film was a great watch for me, because I was interested in learning more about the man, and the film did a good job at telling a story about a man who hated his enemies. This film was very good and I recommend it to anyone who likes historical or documentary films. It was very well made, and I was not disappointed. Overall: 7/10

Theresa Evans photo
Theresa Evans

This movie was made for the American people, and a few friends and I were excited to watch it. And I was disappointed. We knew the facts about Joseph McCarthy, but we weren't really in the mood to read a great novel. I know a lot of people hate this movie, but I did find it mildly entertaining. The movie is about the most dishonest, manipulative, and paranoid figure of American history, a man who started the witch hunt against the communists in America, and then proceeded to try to make everyone around him a suspect. I didn't find the movie very scary, but I did find it to be very entertaining. The acting was very good, and I think the casting was very well done. I also enjoyed the idea of the movie. The movie is definitely not a documentary, but it is about a person who tried to control everything, and made everyone around him suspect, but I think that the acting of Tom Hanks is excellent. I was also a little disappointed that the movie doesn't have a very big impact on the American public, because I believe that a movie about McCarthy would be just as entertaining as the movie "Mein Kampf" or "The Communist Manifesto". I recommend this movie to those who are fans of the history of America, and to those who are interested in the most controversial figures of the 20th century. I think that if you are a fan of McCarthy, this movie is not for you. I would give this movie a 8.5/10.

Gerald photo

A beautifully made film. At least in the first half, the story is something that would have made a good movie. However, the second half is not much better. The story, however, still is interesting enough. The acting is great. The direction is quite good. I would have liked to see the "miracle" work at the end, but the ending is very "fine."

Benjamin N. photo
Benjamin N.

At first, this movie is way too slow. But the movie itself doesn't suffer from this. The plot is much better than most action movies. I actually really like it. The acting was really good, especially from Kurt Russell. As I said, the story itself is much better than most action movies, though. The characters are really unique and this movie is more interesting than many other action movies. The director did a great job, too. There are parts in the movie that make you think and that is good, too. Overall, I really liked this movie and I highly recommend it.

Jack L. photo
Jack L.

As many other reviewers have mentioned, this movie is not an award-winning film, and yet it deserves recognition for the skill it portrays. It is true that the movie is largely about human greed and power, but it is also an accurate portrayal of the corruption of power, which pervades all levels of government. The movie follows an alternate history version of the Clinton administration, and presents it in a very unflattering light. In that sense, the movie is more a thriller than a film, and that is a great deal. It is certainly worth the viewing of the full film, and the directors' commentary makes it worth the viewing of just the trailer. And I would definitely recommend that viewers check out their history books, as well. It is a history lesson for all to learn from. 8/10

Kevin photo

I'm a Tom Hanks fan and so I was curious about this film. When I saw it, I was actually very impressed with the acting, especially from Hanks and Halle Berry. I also thought the movie was very interesting. But I'm really upset that it was banned in the US. It should be considered a great film that is not allowed to be shown here. I think that it should have been shown in the theaters, but it was banned in the US because it didn't show the Satanic ritual that the church did to the gay couple. That scene was very powerful and has been suppressed. If the US had allowed this to be shown, it would have made more of an impact. But we didn't have to hear any Satanic ritual. We didn't have to hear the Satanic ritual from anyone. We just saw it. But we should have been able to see the Satanic ritual. It really shocked me. I'm so sorry that this movie was censored in the US.

Diana W. photo
Diana W.

Eugene. That's what you would think if you watch the trailer. The movie itself, on the other hand, is actually quite good. The premise is an old one, as is the subject of the film, but it's still enjoyable. It's interesting to see how the current administration is in the middle of its fourth year in office, the current crop of Republican Senators and Representatives, all of whom seem to be as much of a jerk as they are a potential President. The current administration has been trying to turn America into the "New Englander" with its all-inclusive health care system, while, on the other hand, we've been doing so well for ourselves that we're looking to the government to help us out. It seems to me that this was the very basis of the film. I've heard the same things coming from the mouths of these politicians, especially the current Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid. All this nonsense is really nothing new, but it's well-done and well-acted. This is the kind of film that can keep a politician in office for years, even when he/she should be gone. Unfortunately, the current President is not the current Senator. This isn't a presidential election. This is a mandate. I recommend it to those who want to watch a decent film about a recent Presidential election.

Amber B. photo
Amber B.

My kids and I were watching the movie and were laughing so hard we were nearly sick of it. I will give it an eight for the kids, who loved it. But I feel like the movie could have been better. The cinematography was great, and the scene in the scene where the police made the girls crawl into the bathroom to get a blanket to cover them was well done. The special effects were great, and the music score was great. However, there were several things I didn't like about the movie. 1) I felt like the title was misleading, and didn't help you when you were watching the movie. 2) There were way too many characters in the movie. This would have been better if they had focused on only a few. 3) There were a lot of scenes where the characters were very passive, and didn't seem to be involved in anything. 4) Some of the scenes were done well, but there were a lot of parts where I didn't feel like the story was in the movie, and didn't really understand what was happening. 5) The movie seemed to be a little bit long, and the music score and cinematography could have been better, but overall, I think it was a great movie. My children and I enjoyed it, and I think parents should go see it. Rating: 7/10

Katherine Ross photo
Katherine Ross

It's always a joy to see the man behind the film in the lead role and in this case, Hugh Jackman is in top form. He brings to the screen a man with the bravado, wit and acting ability of a boxer. His portrayal of Hugh Jackman is just plain smart. It's never a shock when he is in a character of a boxer or when he delivers a line that says "I have to get my way". Jackman doesn't pull any punches. He's a man that is as quick on the draw as he is with his word. He's a great foil to Jack Nicholson's "the cat" in this film. The film is one of the best for me, since the very first time I saw it, but it's definitely not the best film of 2006. The problem with many films is that they have an early introduction to the characters that leads the viewer to believe that it's just a film about one man. This film doesn't do that. It just follows the life of a man who is in his mid-30's when the story takes place. The acting is simply wonderful and Jackman is the best of his kind, as far as I'm concerned. I can't wait for his next film!

Judith photo

Beneath the surface, this film is an uncomfortable look at the relationship between a seemingly good man and his young son. Told through the eyes of William Hurt as a documentary filmmaker, his story is told through the eyes of an adulterer, played by a young Chris Pratt. In one of the film's best scenes, the father asks his son why he doesn't tell him he loves him anymore. The son says he loves his dad so much he doesn't want to tell him anymore. A tense scene is shown, one which ends with Hurt dying at the hands of his son. As the film comes to an end, the camera returns to Hurt, he still in a hospital bed. He asks his son to tell him he loves him, and he says yes. We are then given Hurt's own confession, during which he expresses regret for never telling him his feelings. It is almost as if Hurt wanted the film to be a love letter to his son. Hurt was truly in love with his son, yet he had a troubled relationship with his father, a man whom he deeply cared for. Hurt was almost like a younger version of himself, and his film shows the confusion and internal conflict of a man who had a tumultuous childhood, yet still harbored a true love for his son. A film that could easily have been as graphic as other contemporary films about abuse, Hurt's film holds a few moments of authenticity that only come through the acting of the two leads, their deep connection, and the excellent direction of Gus Van Sant. Van Sant has a very unique style. It can be jarring at times, and his film can be extremely hard to sit through. But it is a film that will resonate with viewers, and, for that, it should be praised. This film is not perfect. Some of the acting is very awkward, and the film doesn't always have the right pacing. However, for Hurt's story to have worked, his character would have needed to have been better developed, and for Hurt's relationship to have had more substance. The film is very unique and the performances of both Hurt and Pratt are excellent, but it is still difficult to watch as it is just too hard to watch. While this film may not be for everyone, if you enjoy the work of director Gus Van Sant, you should check out his work. I give this film a strong 7/10. Recommended to those who have an interest in the subject of child abuse.

Anna Lawson photo
Anna Lawson

All I can say is that I am stunned by the way the film was received. This film was better than I thought it would be. Some have compared it to Saving Private Ryan and that is not true. There is an amazing love story in here and all of the characters really shine. The camera work is incredible and the film has a real sense of place. The scenes with the prisoners are also breathtaking. This film is very different from most war movies. It is more about a human story and I can't say enough about this film. It is great. Enjoy.

Juan photo

First of all, I think that I have to apologize for my bad English, which I only read on the DVD of the movie. I hope this was not a big problem for anyone, but just in case it wasn't. There were many many scenes in the movie that I simply couldn't understand. The dialogs and some of the scenes were at times really bad. So I had to look up subtitles for the other parts, but in this movie that just made it more frustrating, but not too bad. The way the characters talk is often hard to understand. I guess I'm just bad at understanding the English language. In any case, I would definitely recommend that you watch this movie. This movie is based on a book by Louis-Marie Cauchon. He did a great job at writing it and making it really great. I hope that you like this movie, because I sure did. You might be surprised about some of the things that happen in the movie. This movie is definitely not a movie that everyone will like. If you are looking for a movie that everyone can relate to, then this is not the movie for you. If you are looking for a movie that you can like, then this is the movie for you. I really hope that you can see the movie that I wrote about it, because it is really good. It is based on a true story, which really made me think about it. I hope that this is a helpful movie for you.

Joe A. photo
Joe A.

I'm a HUGE Shakespearean fan. I have seen almost all of his plays, and I can honestly say that this film is the best of all. I've seen it twice and I still love it. I'm not sure what the heck all the fuss is about. I saw it with my best friend, and I didn't even know what to say to him, because it was so good. I loved it so much that I had to watch it again the next day. I'm glad I did. I've been wanting to watch it since I was a kid. The story is amazing. The characters are so well developed and the actors are amazing. The only thing that could have made it better would be a better story, but the actors are amazing. If you love Shakespeare, I can't think of a better film to see. I've seen it over and over again, and I'm still looking forward to the next one. I highly recommend this film to anyone.

Lawrence Barrett photo
Lawrence Barrett

This movie was directed by Bryan Singer and I have to say that he pulled it off well. I loved the movie and it had me glued to the screen. As I sat in the theater, I realized that the movie was based off a true story that happened during the Revolutionary War and as a Revolutionary War buff, I couldn't have been more satisfied with the movie. But one thing that was missing was more of the brutality of the Revolutionary War. So I don't understand why this movie didn't get more attention from the movie industry. This movie is definitely worth a watch for the soldiers, military, and history buffs. But if you want to watch the film for some pure entertainment, I suggest you stick to some of the other films out there.

Ralph A. photo
Ralph A.

Well I am a loyal Spielberg fan. And I am a major fan of his work in general. For those of you that do not know this film was based on an acclaimed novel by Kevin Kelly. It is a good movie, but not quite Spielberg's best. It has a few things going for it. One is that it is more gritty and realistic than most films of its type. Another is that it is a good story. It has a great cast and makes me feel that Spielberg is really able to create characters that you can feel and see. I don't really want to reveal the plot. It is very well made and very entertaining. I will say that I think this film is more about how these people really were and not about their personalities or how they act. I would recommend this film to any serious movie lover, even though I am a big fan of Steven's work.

Jerry C. photo
Jerry C.

One of my favorite movie of all time. Every time i watch this movie i get another amazing feeling in my head. i know it may be said that this is a great movie and there's no way a movie could compare to this one. but the truth is this movie is not just a great movie, but it's also a beautiful masterpiece. The movie starts with a fantastic line. "The two most frightening words in the English language are, 'I love you.' " And after that the movie takes a great twist that's not to be missed. This is a movie that will stay with you and show you what you always wanted to know but couldn't dare to say, but there's so much more. This is a movie you just have to watch.

Juan photo

With the help of the Nazi and Nazi sympathizer US President Franklin D. Roosevelt, one of the greatest of the American founding fathers, Abraham Lincoln, President Abraham Lincoln (Ryan) discovers a deep truth. He is determined to find a way to stop a war in which he feels that it's necessary to save the US from an invasion of Poland by the Soviets. On the side of the President, I had read many reviews that said that the movie is a movie about two different people but I never saw a word about the Hitler figure and the conflict between him and the president. This movie is about the conflict between the man and the man, the one who had done the most, the one who, as President, had the greatest power and the one who had done most and was, in my opinion, the most important figure in history. And I saw nothing about the man in the movie. In the end, I think the movie is a movie about the conflict between the man and the man and that makes it more interesting. That makes the movie more than two people, two different sides of a very important war, it makes the movie more than two different people. I think it's a great movie, that, at least, has some truth.

Elizabeth photo

This movie is absolutely beautiful and perfect for the whole family. The casting is perfect and the performances are very good. The movie is about the second world war, and it is a good movie to see. It is a very interesting movie. The story is very well done, and the acting is very good. It is a very well made movie, and the special effects are very good. The movie is very interesting and the way it is made is very good. This movie is a must see. I highly recommend this movie to anyone. The movie is a very good movie to see.

Stephanie photo

This is one of my favorite films. I'm a fan of the subject matter and the way the film is presented. It's a great look at a complex subject and an extremely good film. It is truly a masterpiece. I'm not sure how I would describe it. The acting is superb, the story is fascinating and the photography is beautiful. The soundtrack is wonderful, it adds to the film. The acting and the story is so compelling that it takes you on a journey that you will never forget. It's very difficult to put into words what I felt when I watched this film. The only thing I can think of is that it's a story about hope and I feel it's very well told. I also feel that it's a story about hope in general and how people can rise up and fight for their rights. The music is amazing and it makes you feel so good. The characters are amazing and I feel that they are the most important part of the film. It's one of the most important films I've ever seen. It's really a masterpiece.

Linda photo

As a movie buff I am not a fan of the political thriller genre. I love the movie "The Imposters" but I don't find it to be a particularly political thriller. However, I found this movie to be a very entertaining, intelligent and suspenseful film. The film is a wonderful story about a storyteller who is trying to tell the truth about his life and his family. The acting is outstanding, the story is captivating, the soundtrack is great and the film is a must-see for anyone who is interested in the human condition and the way we treat each other. This film is very rare and it is a very good film.