Watch Cracked Up

Cracked Up

Cracked Up is a movie starring Darrell Hammond. In Cracked Up we witness the effects adverse childhood experiences can have across a lifetime through the incredible story of actor, comedian, master impressionist and Saturday Night...

Running Time
1 hours 35 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Michelle Esrick
Darrell Hammond
Audio Languages
English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

In Cracked Up we witness the effects adverse childhood experiences can have across a lifetime through the incredible story of actor, comedian, master impressionist and Saturday Night Live veteran, Darrell Hammond. Behind the scenes Darrell suffered from debilitating flashbacks, self injury, addiction and misdiagnosis, until the right doctor isolated the key to unlocking the memories his brain kept locked away for over 50 years. Cracked Up, director Michelle Esrick, creates an inspiring balance between comedy and tragedy helping us understand the impact of toxic stress and childhood trauma in a new light, breaking down barriers of stigma and replacing shame with compassion and hope.

Comments about documentary «Cracked Up» (21)

Adam photo

The DVD version of this documentary is a pretty good presentation of the subject matter. The film is a great mix of humor, documentary, and even some documentary style documentary style. It is an entertaining documentary that will get the viewer thinking about what is happening in our society. I would recommend this movie to anyone interested in what is going on in the United States. It is a great topic that should be discussed. It is also a great subject to have a good laugh at. I would recommend this movie to anyone who likes comedy or documentaries. It is a good movie that will give you something to think about after you watch it.

Tyler H. photo
Tyler H.

I loved the first one, but this one was really good. I was really surprised at how much they did to the plot. It was a lot of what I would have expected from the first movie, but in a way I liked it more because it had more interesting stuff. I think this movie is a good representation of what happens when you try to recreate the experience of the first movie. It shows the first movie as it should be, but in a way that makes it more like a documentary. I think it's a lot of fun to watch the first movie again, and I really liked this one. I really enjoyed the idea of making a movie about the first movie. I don't know what the hell they were thinking with the first one, but I think it was really fun to make a movie about it. I really liked the ending, but I don't think it's the best ending. It was really long and they really took a lot of time to do that. It felt like they took a lot of time with the first one and then just took the time to put that ending in. I would have loved to see the whole thing with the older brother, but I guess that would have been too much for the audience to take. I would definitely recommend this one.

Jordan Simpson photo
Jordan Simpson

As the number of other people who've commented on this thread have noted, I'm not really a fan of the "thriller" genre. I've always enjoyed the actors and directors who've tried to make a "thriller" (i.e. The Godfather, The Deer Hunter, The Godfather Part 2, etc.) but I've always found them to be somewhat disappointing. As a result, I was very disappointed when I watched The Departed. I had heard some good things about it, so I was looking forward to it. I'm glad I watched it. The Departed is a great film, though I'm not sure it's the best film of the year. The Departed is a film about the aftermath of a drug deal gone wrong. It is about the drug dealers who are the stars of the movie, the people who lost everything they had, and the people who were not in the deal but ended up in the middle of it. The Departed is a film that shows the hard reality of drugs, and how the effects of addiction can be deadly. This is the first time I've seen Tom Cruise in a movie, and he really surprised me. His performance was outstanding. He showed us the physical and psychological pain of addiction and showed us how it can affect your entire life. I have to admit that I was a little surprised by him, and I'm glad I watched the movie. If you haven't seen The Departed, I would definitely recommend it. It is a very well made film, and the performances of the actors, especially Cruise and Kidman, were amazing. I think it is one of the best films of the year.

Diane Coleman photo
Diane Coleman

This film has a lot going for it. It's funny and insightful, even though it's based on a true story. However, it has a pretty big problem. It is a little too long. There is no tension or excitement, and there are some parts that are just plain boring. It's almost as if it is trying to take itself seriously. It would be a good film to watch if you are feeling depressed and in need of a good laugh, but for those of us who have a few laughs to be had, it is not that funny. There is a good documentary on the film by Paul Schrader, which is pretty cool. It explains the story of this documentary and also explains how the "false news" was made up. The documentary also explains how the movie came to be. Overall, this film is good. It's not great, but it's not bad either. I liked it. 7/10

Mark photo

I have seen this movie so many times and I still love it! This movie is about how a group of 12 year old girls get trapped in a bizarre haunted house and it has everything a horror movie needs. The acting is great, the special effects are great, the characters are great, and the plot is great! This movie has everything you could want in a horror movie! It's just a great movie. If you are a fan of horror movies or just want to be entertained, then you should definitely check out this movie! I give it an 8/10!

Crystal photo

I was a little disappointed by this film. It was funny, but the narrative was too sketchy. They had great actors in this, and they did a great job with the subject matter. I don't know why they didn't make a documentary on the AIDS crisis in the early 80's. The production was well-done and the imagery was great. However, the editing was terrible. I couldn't understand the information given to the audience. It was mostly text, which wasn't great because it was too short and too hard to understand. The story was told through interviews with people who knew the individuals in the film, and the filmmaker did a great job of putting those interviews together to tell the story. However, the information was too sketchy. The story was presented in a very disorganized way. I think this was because of the subject matter. I don't think the film was terribly accurate. I would have liked to see more information on how the virus got out of the system. They did a great job with the subject matter, but the editing was terrible. I think this film was a good documentary, but I think they could have done better with the information they were given. I would recommend this film to anyone who is interested in the AIDS crisis, and if you want to learn about how the disease was spread, I think this film is a great way to do that.

Rachel photo

After reading some of the other reviews, I wasn't expecting much from this film, but I was wrong. It's a very well-done film. If you like documentaries, this is a must see. If you're not interested in documentaries, then I would suggest waiting for this one to come out on DVD, but I know many of you have been waiting for it for a long time, so I'd suggest getting it now. The first part of the film is the beginning, where the writer/director of the film talks about how he got interested in this subject matter and how he got involved. He also explains what he did to get people interested in this subject. I would suggest reading the book before watching the film, it explains much of what you'll see in the film. After reading the book, I would suggest watching the film first. I've watched it twice now, and I enjoyed it both times, it's just a very well done documentary. I liked how the filmmaker took the time to explain the story and the science behind it, which makes you think about it more. He also talks about how the filmmaker got involved with his father, which is very important to understand because it will give you an insight into his life and why he decided to be in this film. I would also recommend reading the other reviews on this film before watching it. They will give you an idea of what you will see, but don't read the other reviews, they'll give you the wrong impression of this film. I would recommend watching this film first and then read the other reviews to get the most out of this film.

Pamela Garcia photo
Pamela Garcia

I was really looking forward to this movie, it was a shame it didn't do much better than the reviews here and on the IMDb. It's not the greatest movie, but it's definitely not the worst. It's not too long, and there are no huge problems with the story. It's about a bunch of guys who are bored, and the guys decide to go on a "World of Warcraft" adventure in the mountains of Iceland. They meet some interesting characters, and the movie takes off. It's not the best of the lot, but it's definitely not the worst. I wouldn't recommend it to anyone who is looking for a great movie, or for the best of the worst.

Roy Peters photo
Roy Peters

I was really disappointed with this movie. It's not funny, and it has a bunch of hidden messages that the viewer doesn't need to be a doctor or doctor's assistant to understand. It was a very low budget movie and had a lot of people in it. The film was not enjoyable, and I was very disappointed. The message is that a doctor shouldn't be able to see what's going on inside a patient's body. There are many other things that this doctor does that are not very useful. The doctor doesn't know the correct procedure to remove a tumour. In fact, the film tells the viewer that a doctor shouldn't even bother to remove the tumour. The film is really boring and I am not a big fan of medical documentaries.

Harold photo

This is the most non-exaggerated documentary I have ever seen. And the best. If you don't like it, then you must be a jerk. This is a documentary that takes a lot of twists and turns, with a lot of behind-the-scenes footage and interviews, and the end is something like a puzzle. It is not a documentary. It is a movie, but not a really good one. If you liked this, I can't recommend it enough. I thought it was great, but I'm sure you will. I was not impressed with the original doc. It was a low-budget film that was mostly about the "painful" process of making it. This doc is a much better production. The interviews are good, and it doesn't come across as a documentary, even though it is a movie. It is a documentary. I was surprised to see that the documentary is rated PG-13, which is usually a PG-13, even for a PG-13 film. The scenes that are rated PG-13 are mainly graphic, and I would not have rated it PG-13, but I think the PG-13 rating is appropriate for the content. If you are a fan of the documentary, I would recommend this film.

Martha E. photo
Martha E.

This film is a perfect example of why Hollywood films are terrible. I understand that the filmmakers are trying to satirize the lives of the rich and famous, but what they've done is waste their talent and their money on this. It's about as funny as watching the two idiots from the Twilight movies spend the whole film complaining about how they never get laid. The characters in this film are so uninteresting and uninteresting that I could barely care about any of them. Even Tom Cruise is so bland that I found myself waiting for him to die. And the worst part is that the film itself is a boring waste of time. The whole film is a bunch of people doing the same thing over and over again, and you're supposed to feel bad for them because it's such a boring waste of time. I'm a bit surprised that this film got such a high rating. I have no idea what the reviewers are smoking, but the film is a total bore.

Deborah photo

A lot of people have given this movie a bad review because of the fact that it does not do a lot of interviews with people. While this is true, I found this movie to be quite informative. The people interviewed for this documentary were all very interesting and fun to listen to. I highly recommend this documentary for anyone who is interested in the topic. I would have given this a 10 if it weren't for the fact that I did not like the ending. I thought the ending was a bit anticlimactic and the entire point of the documentary was to get to the bottom of this. The ending made me feel a bit more cheated and less interested in this topic. However, this is just my opinion.

Joshua S. photo
Joshua S.

This is a good, funny documentary about the porn industry. It's interesting because it's not trying to make an argument about porn. It just shows the industry and what it is like. There is no point in it trying to educate people about porn or anything like that. It's a movie and it's meant to be funny and it does that well. The only reason I'm giving it a 7 is because I think it's a bit too short. I think the movie could have been longer.

Joan R. photo
Joan R.

You have to know something about the psychology of the psychology of the adult. In my opinion this is one of the most interesting movies I've seen in a long time. I don't think it's meant to be an Oscar contender, but I'm giving it a 7 because it is a good movie and it is very well done. It is not supposed to be an educational piece, but it can be interesting to see the process of how people act and react. It's not about what happens, it's about what is going on in their minds, and the way it affects them and their relationships. I think this movie does a good job of conveying this idea, and it's worth watching. If you like movies about psychology, you will like this one. It's not a documentary, but it is educational, and it is a very good movie.

Kathryn Cox photo
Kathryn Cox

This movie is about the reasons behind the success of Smashing Pumpkins, from the studio to the band to the fans, and from the initial idea to the final product. This is a great movie, it's well worth seeing.

Michael Payne photo
Michael Payne

The best thing about this documentary is that it is short and the information that it presents is actually quite relevant to modern day life. The best part of the movie is when the people are discussing the stuff that they actually have to deal with. It is a pretty serious topic, and the information that it presents is pretty enlightening. The documentary is short and it does a good job at giving you the information you need to know. There are a few aspects that I found to be quite disappointing, however. First, the fact that there are so many people in this movie who were talking about how they have to deal with being "the nerd". It is not fair to compare a person to being a nerd, because there are a lot of different ways that people can be a nerd. I can't help but think that if the documentary makers had just had the interviewees talk about what they actually do as nerds, then it would have been a better documentary. Second, there are a lot of people who are just bashing this movie because they think that it is anti-nerd. I think that they just need to get a life. It is not really anti-nerd, but it is more of an anti-troll. The majority of the people in this movie were just speaking about how they dealt with being nerds. In the end, the movie was really entertaining, and I think that it is a good way to show the people of the world about how they deal with their hobbies. It was also good that they didn't have to show the scenes of the people playing video games, because that would have been a little boring and would have distracted from the subject of the movie. All in all, I would definitely recommend this movie to people who are interested in the subject of nerds and how they are treated in society. It is definitely a movie that people can watch and have a good time with, because it is not a film that you have to think about. If you want to watch a movie that is entertaining, I would recommend "The Fault In Our Stars". It is a great movie and it is very realistic about the life of a nerd.

Sarah M. photo
Sarah M.

I was pleasantly surprised at how great this movie was. It was actually the first time I had seen a documentary about LSD. I loved the way the filmmaker talked about the drug, the effects, and the stories about people who have experienced it. This was the first documentary I have seen about the drug, so I was interested to see how it compares to other documentaries about LSD. The first one I watched was on ABC in 1989, and it was a good one. This one was the first I have seen on Netflix, and it was very interesting. I really liked the way they did the documentary, and I also liked the interviews with the people who had experienced LSD. The only reason I gave it a 7 was because it wasn't really a documentary. It was just a bunch of interviews with people who had experienced the drug. However, if you are interested in the drug, it is a good documentary. It is interesting to see how it affects people and how it affects people's personalities. It is a very good documentary. I really recommend it to anyone who is interested in the drug.

Dylan photo

I thought this was a very good documentary, I wasn't expecting much, but it was very interesting. The first part of the movie is really good, I loved the interviews with the people involved with the movie. I felt like I was watching a documentary. The second part of the movie is very interesting. It gives you the inside story of what went on in the movie. You hear a lot of the people involved with the movie talk about the story and their feelings on the project. I thought that was really great. I would recommend this movie to everyone. It's a great movie to watch with your friends or family. I'm really surprised how many people liked this movie. I thought the only problem with the movie is that it could've been a little shorter, but I'm not sure why that is. It was very good. It was very interesting. I recommend this movie to anyone who likes documentaries. I give it a 7 out of 10.

Philip photo

Saw this on Sundance. I thought the movie was pretty good, and the director did a good job with the movie. I would definitely recommend seeing this movie if you want to get a good look at what some of the weirdest people on the planet go through. The acting was pretty good for a movie that was just shot on a phone camera. I would definitely recommend seeing this movie, it is definitely worth it.

Anna photo

As far as I'm concerned, it's a shame that an entire documentary on the subject of suicide is not on the DVD set for "The Boys in the Band." It was a truly fascinating film, not only because of its subjects but also because of its methodology. There is a lot of talk about how the film is not just about suicide but how people can kill themselves. The main character of the film is Michael, a 25 year old student who was a member of a rock band in his high school years. As a college student, he is going through a very hard time trying to come to terms with his sexual identity. Michael is a gay man who has been in a relationship with a man for five years. He is not gay but is interested in the idea of being gay. He is also having some trouble with his brother who is now married and has a daughter. He is constantly thinking of ways to get out of his funk. He is also having trouble with his friend who is a white male who is still in the closet. Michael's brother and friend are both gay and have been together for about 15 years. This is a highly unusual situation, especially for gay people. But they are gay and have been together for a long time. They are not being open about it and are not really having any kind of relationship. The first time I saw this film, I was very intrigued and the way it was put together made it seem like it would be a really interesting documentary. However, it did not turn out that way. Instead of focusing on the gay issues, the film focused on the problems in Michael's family and on his sexual identity. I am not sure how much of the subjects in the film are true. It is not a perfect documentary but it is a very interesting one. I think it's a great documentary for people who are interested in the subject. It is a very important subject and there is a lot of interesting material that has not been covered by other documentaries. I think this film is not that important and that is why it is so good. If you are interested in this topic, this is a very good documentary. If you are interested in gay issues, this is a very good documentary.

Vincent M. photo
Vincent M.

Having been a fan of the comics and movies for decades, I was extremely excited to see this movie. I had read the reviews before the movie came out, and I was happy to see they were wrong. This movie was a great starting point for any comic book fan to dive into the comic book world. My only complaint is that the movie left out a lot of details, and just covered the basics. I think the director tried to cover too much information, and ended up not explaining anything at all. My first complaint is the movie left out all the things I loved about the comics. If you are going to make a movie, and want to leave out a lot of the things you loved about the comics, don't make a movie for comic book fans. They love it, and they will be disappointed if you don't include all the things they love. The other thing I didn't like about this movie was the acting. Some of the characters were annoying and just didn't fit well. I understand the movie was trying to portray the dark and gritty aspects of the comics, but some of the actors just didn't have the charisma to carry a role like that. The character of Iceman was a good example of a character that just wasn't suited for the part. The actors did a great job with what they were given, but I felt like they could have been better. It was still a great movie though, and I highly recommend it to anyone who is a fan of the comic books.