Watch Complete Unknown

Complete Unknown

Complete Unknown is a movie starring Erin Darke, Rachel Weisz, and Hansel Tan. As a man contemplates moving to a new state with his wife for her graduate program, an old flame - a woman who often changes identities - reenters his...

Other Titles
雙面艾莉絲, コンプリート・アンノウン 私の知らない彼女, O Completo Desconhecido, Nieznajoma, Akit senki sem ismer, Desconhecida, Complete Unknown - Cambio d'identità, Yeniden Ben, Complete Unknown - Du bist, wer du vorgibst zu sein, Teljesen ismeretlen, Άγνωστοι, Identities
Running Time
1 hours 31 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Mystery, Drama
Joshua Marston
Julian Sheppard, Joshua Marston
Rachel Weisz, FaTye, Erin Darke, Hansel Tan
Audio Languages
English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

As a man contemplates moving to a new state with his wife for her graduate program, an old flame - a woman who often changes identities - reenters his life at a birthday dinner party.

Comments about mystery «Complete Unknown» (21)

Sean Henderson photo
Sean Henderson

I'll be honest, I wasn't sure what to expect from this film, but in the end it was a good one. I watched it with my mom and she is much more of a fan of indie films, so it was a treat to see her in the movie, but I don't think she was as shocked and amazed as I was when the movie ended. I felt like I was actually in the time period and the film also helped me to learn more about the War on Terror. Some of the issues raised in the film, were a little off-putting but in all, it's a film about young people and that's what makes it so great. I recommend this film to anyone who is curious or needs a good kick-ass ending to a dark and confusing movie.

Kathryn Mendez photo
Kathryn Mendez

There's a lot of emotions you can feel when you see this movie and I think that it's great that it's giving us a view about the horror of being in love. Both the movie and the movie's writers really use the word "love" a lot and it's very sweet. The movie is well directed, well acted, and well made. I liked it very much. I give this movie a "7" out of 10.

David photo

I'm not very good at comparing movies, and it's hard for me to say how much this movie is similar to any other movies, but it sure was close. This movie is about an AIDS patient who is trying to find the truth of his disease and his life. I didn't really get any conflict in this movie and it was pretty hard to keep up with the story. It had a good plot, though. My rating is 7/10

Roy S. photo
Roy S.

Director Mark Stanley has been working on projects for a while now. His first film, O.T.O., was a big hit, and the second film was slightly below the average. The third film, Crimson Peak, was a huge disappointment, and I was actually very sad to see him let it die. But, luckily, he's back with a bang with unknown director's cut. The movie takes place in three different time periods, in three different locations. One of them is the past, the other two are present and future. The only thing that makes the movie different is that the film is being filmed from a first person perspective. This really made the film feel fresh, and made me remember a lot of things. The film is filmed from the perspective of a journalist who is following a serial killer. The film starts with the journalist (played by Kristin Scott Thomas) being in Paris, France, and going to the crime scene of the crime. From here, she follows the killer around Paris, and finding out that he was a journalist. It is then that the film turns into a thriller, and it is the third act that makes the film so much fun. The crime scenes are very well shot and the acting is also excellent. I also liked that the film has a dark feel to it. The action is quite interesting, and there are a lot of things to think about. The way that the film is filmed makes it feel like you are actually in the crime. One of the things I liked about the film was the score. It was very atmospheric, and it's a very well done score. The film has a good pace, and I think that this is one of Stanley's better films. He has always been good, and this film proves it. It also doesn't try to be something that it is not. I think that it is a good film, and I'm looking forward to seeing more from Stanley.

Marie photo

Just to summarize, The Last Door was made in 2013, after a long time I actually got to see it and it was pretty good. It's a fictional story set in Australia, about a small town that is threatened with a mass execution. A young man that is studying philosophy and religion is asked by the local authorities to provide a reason to justify a mass execution. For that, he asks himself, what is the significance of life? A week later, the young man finds that he's been mysteriously transported from the town of Crystal Lake to a small hotel in the mountains. He is confronted by an eccentric guest and one of the guests is the man who is about to die. This is a good film with a decent story and interesting characters. I found it not very scary and I could find it not very exciting at all. It's not scary, there is no intense effect, but this is not a bad film. It's a good film that could be better. For me, it is worth the time, but I don't think it's as good as the rest of the cast. This film is good, but I don't really know what to rate it. 7/10

Jordan photo

I have seen many film reviews that called this movie a 'tragicomic' or 'outrageous' and say that it 'fails to make any sense' and be 'unbelievably shocking'. They even call it an 'epic failure'. I disagree with these reviews. I feel that it has been done in a far better way. It's a film that is extremely well acted and well directed. I wouldn't call it an epic failure because it does contain some really well made moments. It's a film that, in my opinion, is very well worth the watch and one that you should not miss. 7.5/10

David photo

I think it's an interesting movie, and the story is intriguing. It's a story about a woman who lived a very lonely life, not having a job, a boyfriend or a job in the USA, and living in a small room with a bed and a door. The movie also tells about a woman who had to deal with problems when she had to marry in the beginning of the 60s. It's a fascinating story. So many elements that come together to tell this story. The husband is always waiting for her to return. She's alone. She doesn't have a job. Her mother is always angry with her. She's always waiting for her father to get back from the war. She's always waiting for the boyfriend. Her life was in complete chaos, living in a small room with a bed and a door. The movie will have you guessing a little bit what's going to happen. It's a very fascinating story. I think the movie was very well done, and I think it would be a good movie to watch if you've never had any of the above things happen to you. It will give you a good feeling for the problems and difficulties people in this country experienced. I think it's a good movie to watch.

Gloria Olson photo
Gloria Olson

A story about a young boy with no father and his search for him, his mother, and his friends who are trying to help him. (Although a lot of the scenes seem like they were taken out of a 'classic' thriller movie.) The lead character is played very well by Ben Mendelsohn. The story is believable and believable. It is very realistic for a child actor (he was nominated for an Academy Award). His brother, played by Mark Wahlberg, is not as good as Ben Mendelsohn. It's not as good as the two main characters, but it is still good. The music is not as good as in other movies of this genre, but it is still good. I think that the movie would be better if it were longer, but I still have to say that this is a good movie, which is a good thing.

Bruce photo

This was a very very good movie! A mix between The Usual Suspects and Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon, the plot is similar to both of those films, and the acting was better. The mystery of the killer is extremely interesting, and I think that the mystery will be a plus for many people, but what the movie does best is the great cinematography. The images are extremely creative, the locations used are unique, and the movie makes excellent use of a really well shot camera. I would recommend this movie to anyone, and highly recommend it to all. You will not be disappointed, but I think that people will enjoy it more. Some people will really hate this movie, but I think that most people will love it. I would highly recommend this movie to anyone, and if you are an action/thriller/thriller fan, I think you will enjoy this movie.

Billy R. photo
Billy R.

This movie is not that great. It is not that bad. It is the movie you wish they would just end. You can tell this is only making money on the DVD sales. So far, I've only seen it on TV, but I have some plans to rent it. But until then, don't waste your time. I felt like the whole movie was nothing but an excuse to get money out of the viewers.

Eugene Campbell photo
Eugene Campbell

This is a very interesting look at the cult of Henry David Thoreau. The movie is directed by Wim Wenders, and was written by Otto Binder, a German journalist who witnessed Thoreau's life, and became obsessed with the man. As a result, this film is not a straightforward documentary, but a series of stories, rather than a documentary. It is a drama about two people who lived a long time, and fell in love, but then went their separate ways. It is very interesting how a small story can shape up into an extremely huge story. In fact, this is a very interesting story, and a good look at the human mind.

Randy B. photo
Randy B.

Very few films can ever leave you in total awe. This film should be on that list. The cinematography is incredible, the cinematography is powerful. The music is beautiful. The sound, effects, lighting and the use of the movie as an instrument of art, make this film a masterpiece. You can't stop looking at the picture after it ends. If you haven't seen it, it's a must.

Amber photo

Cinematically, the film is not very good, at least in the first 15 minutes. It's also unclear what the story is about. The acting is poor, especially when it comes to the lead role. I think there's some basic misunderstandings between the director and the actors. The way the film was shot is also quite hard to understand. It's like a lost art from the 1980s, since the director probably couldn't be bothered to use proper techniques and only improvised most of the time. The film is a little bit too long, but you can easily predict what is going to happen in the next scene. The subject matter, the character development and the film's execution are just about average. But I think that the most interesting aspect of this film is the fascinating screenplay. Maybe some critics are trying to pull a fast one on me, but I think I get what the director is trying to do. I think it's a subtle, but profound statement. Something that every father and mother must be thinking about. Just be sure to watch it in Spanish.

Doris photo

The Three Musketeers (pronounced: "Three Musketeers") have a monopoly on their trade, and are in charge of catching terrorists, but while it may sound like a job, it has its darker side. This is a French film that was directed by Anthony F. Paul, who also produced the movie with Francois Poulain, who was responsible for several of Michel Gondry's films. The movie tells the story of two brothers, Pierre (Alexandre de la Iglesia) and Gaston (Nicolas Jaar), who work for the famous three-man Musketeers, who are hiding in the country in search of gold, but are also fighting against the government. It's also a coming-of-age story for the two brothers. As the movie progresses, it focuses on the two brothers' growth and becomes more interesting as they begin to trust each other, and then one night, they are found dead. Even though their brother's death causes them to lose their friendship, they quickly return to their work, and the story goes on. The movie has a lot of great details that you need to pay attention to. The first was the amazing cinematography. As the story unfolds, you know how it's going to end, but it's a little more unexpected. The second was the script. It's full of great dialog, and it's full of great actors, and it's full of good actors, so it's very hard to fault the script. The actors are great in this movie, and they're all great. The story itself is also very interesting, and the plot twists are very well-done. The direction of this movie is also very good. The use of shots and close-ups is very good. Even though the movie is directed by a Frenchman, the direction is very professional. In terms of the acting, the actors are all very good. Pierre is the main protagonist, but he also has a father in the movie, and a friend named Gaston. The supporting cast is great, too. The supporting cast is also good. Michel Gondry's direction is very impressive. The acting is great. The direction is very good. There's a lot of atmosphere in this movie. The story is very interesting, the dialog is very well-done, and the cinematography is impressive. The director's score is also very good. This is a great movie. It's very entertaining and it's a really great movie. I recommend this movie to anyone who likes movies.

Helen P. photo
Helen P.

The movie is about a woman who moves to a new place and she is a professor of philosophy. The student of her professor and one of his students who comes to the university to get a degree. This is not the only mysterious plot of the movie. The mystery and the last scenes of the movie is the most exciting. The scenes of the movie are like a butterfly and the other thing is the surrealness of the movie.

Olivia B. photo
Olivia B.

The film picks up where the first one ended. After seeing that film, I wanted to see more of the same. This one is similar in tone to the original with the original cast as the starting point. I thought the film was better than the first, though not as good as the sequel. The film begins in 1912, when a runaway horse is found in an isolated place. The main character, Hal (Jared Leto), is an orphan who lives on the streets of New York with his brother Frank (Joel Edgerton) and their new sister, Virginia (Lena Headey). As the film goes on, we get to know more of the characters. Virginia is now a young woman, and her brother Frank has since turned into a preacher, and his flock is the town of Willoughby. Hal and his brother decide to get help from a local magician who plays cards with people who want to see their cards. Unfortunately, they get in over their heads and the magician turns out to be an unstable maniac. The film does take a while to get going, but is a good film. It is pretty faithful to the original, with a few changes, such as the new characters and the events taking place. The actors are good in the lead roles, and the characters are played well. The first movie in the series was very different, but this one was surprisingly good. It is really an interesting story, and the fact that the two leads and their new partner are trying to live in a world that they are not in is interesting. The story takes a turn when the magicians return. This was a good change of pace, as the first film was never that interesting, and the rest of the film was all about the original characters. The film does get better when it moves to the Magicians. It is a good movie, but not an incredible one. The second film in the series was also good, though not as good as the first. I really liked this film better than the first, and really enjoyed watching it. The film is also worth watching for the characters, as they are a good cast. The original cast is great, and the new cast is pretty good. The film does a good job of showing what happened to the characters, and they are actually well developed. This film is not the greatest film in the world, but it is still a good film. This film is not a classic, but it is a good film and one worth watching. This film has a slow pace, but it is worth the time. This film is worth the watch.

Teresa photo

This movie is a great piece of art. Great cinematography, great characters, and a great story. The scenery and the dialogues are so original and like to me, perfect. The actor don't fit in their role and they all feel the same. However this movie's story is not so bad. I don't know why this movie has so much dislikes, but people like this movies because of the stars and the story. I don't get how some people would think this movie is a masterpiece. I think this movie is great, but I don't think it deserves a higher rating.

Madison P. photo
Madison P.

What is it about watching movies about people who live in their own land? I don't know if it's the sub-culture of desert people, but I could see that it's all around us. Maybe it's the manner in which the movies are made, or perhaps the use of locations that evoke the desert, or maybe the fact that the people in these films are so well known (The Golden Harvest, Mother Goose, and Walt Disney) gives the films a particular look that it's hard to overlook. But I'm pretty sure I can't go much more than that. It's just really cool to see real people as a plot device, especially when they're being portrayed in such a fascinating way. And if you watch this movie, you may not be able to stop. When you see these characters from the film, you may not be able to look away. The characters may be black, white, or Hispanic, but they're all very different, and they all have a lot of depth. In the end, though, it's probably not even about the characters. And you have to look at them through a certain angle to find out what they're really all about. They're the only people you really care about in this film, and to be honest, I didn't really care that much for them. In that sense, it's almost like watching a collection of people from your own life. But that's not really the point of this film, because if you think about the whole point of the film, you realize that it's about the characters. The only other people you really care about in the film are those who share a personal interest with each other, so the whole point of the film isn't about the characters, it's about the people. That's why, to me, Desert Punk doesn't really matter. But, that's not really what it's about, I guess. All in all, I thought it was really cool to see this film, but I'm sure that I wouldn't have enjoyed it that much if I hadn't seen it first.

Emma Hart photo
Emma Hart

And then he died in a motorcycle accident. One of the most popular shows of the last 30 years. And not a very good movie. Only the last act made me cry. So, I'm going to make a plot summary out of the film. Detective Jake Ellis (Andrew McCarthy) and a Detective Brad Nelson (Sean Astin) are the only two detectives who are experienced enough to do a top-secret job on a crime-busting bank in the Philippines. On the surface, the idea of the job seems crazy but they've been doing it for many years. They are assigned to find out why the bank is empty. And they are going to do the job anyway, even though it involves a group of drug traffickers and a brilliant lawyer. All in all, the movie is pretty interesting. It's not the best movie ever, but it's more interesting than most movies that get nominated for best picture. I have to say that this movie is pretty accurate about the relationships between two people. They seem to be well-developed in a way that most other movies wouldn't be. Andrew McCarthy does a great job playing the smart, but flawed detective, and Sean Astin does a good job playing the ambitious but flawed cop. And the performances of all the other cast members are really good as well. Even the people that are just minor characters, like the lawyer and the drug trafficker, do a great job. Not a movie for everybody. It's not a good movie. But it's still a good movie, and it's not one of those movies that get nominated for best picture. If you like movies like this, you should see it. Rating: 7/10

Jerry Myers photo
Jerry Myers

Hair is a very powerful experience. When you cut it it begins to grow back. And it was a huge part of the first time I watched this movie. So it was with some surprise that the movie does not explore that part of the film. Some people have written that this movie is about a man losing his hair and how he reacts to that. I think that is the same with losing your faith. But in my opinion, I think that the problem is with the way the movie was released. I have no idea how that idea was implemented in the movie. It looks like a bit of a disaster. I was also quite surprised by the film's look. It is not perfect but it is a good one. And I also liked the special effects. They were realistic and look quite well. There is one thing that is missing though. It is the ending. The scene that ends the movie and says that the movie is over. I believe that the director had planned that but that ending was ruined. The scene would have been a good one if it were done earlier in the movie. But I understand that this is not the director's intention. But it was a big disappointment. I know this is not the director's fault. I don't know why it was not done earlier. He had the perfect ending but that is not enough to make the movie a good one.

Kenneth photo

I loved this movie. I thought it was very interesting and the acting was amazing. What really got to me was the mysterious music. I couldn't understand why it was so mysterious. I kept going back to the music and in the end it really made sense. There were many things I was wondering about. However, I think the movie is a 9/10 because of the mystery. I love mysteries in movies and this movie is no different. I also thought the ending was excellent and it really got me thinking. I would recommend this movie to anyone.