Watch Mary Magdalene

Mary Magdalene

Mary Magdalene is a movie starring Rooney Mara, Joaquin Phoenix, and Chiwetel Ejiofor. Twelve men heard and spread the message of Jesus. Only one woman understood it.

Other Titles
María Magdalena, Mária Magdaléna, Μαρία Μαγδαληνή, 抹大拉的馬利亞, Máří Magdaléna, Magdalalı Meryem, Marie Madeleine, Maria Magdalena, Maria Maddalena, Marija Magdaliete, マグダラのマリア, Maria Magdaleena, Mária Magdolna, Maria Madalena
Running Time
2 hours
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Biography, Drama
Garth Davis
Helen Edmundson, Philippa Goslett
Rooney Mara, Tahar Rahim, Joaquin Phoenix, Chiwetel Ejiofor
UK, Australia, USA
Audio Languages
English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

Twelve men heard and spread the message of Jesus. Only one woman understood it.

Comments about biography «Mary Magdalene» (22)

Benjamin photo

The story of the late 18th century Lady Elizabeth Bathory and her association with her half-sister Mary Magdalene is not new. However, the actress who plays Mary Magdalene in this film does a magnificent job in portraying her love of Mary Magdalene. I've seen this film four times and I'll continue to see it, as I can't get enough of it. It is very moving, and the way she portrays her love for Mary Magdalene is very realistic. The scenes that portray her relationship with her younger sister, Queen Caroline, are also very touching. The story is very interesting, and is based on an historical fact. The film doesn't try to force a point or tell a story, it just lets you into the mind of Mary Magdalene. This film is a must see for anyone who has any interest in religion or history.

Paul E. photo
Paul E.

For a more accurate and accurate portrayal of Mary Magdalene, see the film, 'A Mighty Heart'. This is a well-made film and one that portrays the true personality of Mary Magdalene. It is a film that portrays the side of Mary Magdalene that we have never seen. While the movie does not depict Mary Magdalene as a saint, it does portray Mary Magdalene as a flawed person who is still a mother, grandmother, and a good friend to many. I think the movie portrays Mary Magdalene as a mother who will do anything to help her children. She is a mother who tries to give her children the best that life has to offer. Mary Magdalene was not a saint, but she was a good woman who gave the best that life has to offer. This movie shows Mary Magdalene as a strong woman who did what she could to help her children. This is a well-made film. I rate this movie 7 out of 10 stars.

Mildred Gardner photo
Mildred Gardner

A bit of a journey into a secret society. It's not really a great movie, but the story is good and the characters are very well acted. The best part is the plot is the story of Mary Magdalene and the life she lived. The most important part is how the film portrays the secret society of the catholic church. They believe that they are doing the good and holy thing, but in the end they are corrupt and are only doing what they want. I'm not saying that this movie is the best film ever made, but I would definitely recommend it to anyone who is interested in catholicism or their beliefs.

Judy Douglas photo
Judy Douglas

If you want to know what it's like to be a prisoner in a mental hospital then you'll be able to understand the sense of isolation and the nightmare the character Sarah Hall experiences. However, as I said, this movie is not about what it's like to be a prisoner in a mental hospital. It is, as they say, about life in general and the overall struggle to maintain order in a society run by conformity. The characters of Sarah Hall, Margaret Hall, and a young woman named Alice, who appear in the movie, are all part of a group of criminals who were sent to a mental hospital in order to punish the women they believed to be criminals and not to punish them. They had been convicted of sexual offenses and rape. Alice was convicted of killing her sister, Margaret Hall was convicted of killing her husband and Alice was convicted of murdering a young woman. At first, Margaret was too ill to see her husband for several months and had to take care of Alice, and they had to live in a building built specifically for her. In the beginning, Alice has to spend much of her time in a locked-up room with a single window. Alice becomes obsessed with Sarah and makes many fantasies of committing suicide. Sarah develops an intense and very close friendship with Alice. When Alice's sister is raped, Sarah is sent to the hospital. Alice becomes Sarah's confidant, Alice helps Alice to find her husband, Alice's husband kills himself and Sarah finds solace in her friendship with Alice. They are both among the first to leave the hospital. Alice dies in her final days of mental illness. Sarah is taken away from Alice's room to a sanitarium. Alice dies after a mysterious death. The movie concludes with Sarah being released from the sanitarium and going home to a family that she barely knows. Sarah tries to maintain her position as Alice's confidante, but her efforts are thwarted by Margaret. Margaret, who believed Alice's fantasies, is sent to the sanitarium as well. The movie, however, ends on a positive note. Margaret and Sarah are both released from the sanitarium. Margaret becomes an actress and Sarah begins to go on with her life. As she said, Alice was dead but Sarah was alive.

Justin photo

Although the film was based on a true story, it does not do a great job of telling the story. It has a lot of action, but it is never exciting. There is one big plot hole that is not resolved until almost the end of the film. I will not give away the ending, but I will say that it was a bit rushed. The film also lacks a lot of suspense, and it is difficult to understand the motivations of most characters. This is due to a combination of a very long running time, and the fact that the story is too much of a mystery to keep you guessing. It also does not answer the questions that the filmmakers would have wanted to answer. Overall, I would say that the film is watchable for its action, but it is not a great film. It is a decent film, but not a great film.

Howard C. photo
Howard C.

This is one of those films that doesn't necessarily need to be seen on the big screen. A good story, nice acting, well written script, a good cast - the whole package. Unfortunately, it's a film that has been done many times before - and it's been done a lot worse. And I'm not talking about the general quality of the movie (which is fine) but the kind of dialogue. To be fair, I thought the film's script was quite good. I thought that both the actors and the writers did a good job. However, when it comes to dialogues, the script isn't the important thing. For instance, when you are watching a film about a female saint, you need to be able to enjoy the dialogue. Here, the dialogues are pretty bad and often full of expletives. As for the casting, I have to say that I think the main actor and the actress did a decent job. They did a great job with their respective characters. However, I was very disappointed by the acting of the two actors who were supposed to be playing "the killers". They were really bad. They were acting with a poor accent and looked very unprofessional. The way they talked made it hard to understand what they were saying. And while this is not really a major problem in this film, it does affect the whole film. A lot. When watching this film, one should try to forget about the dialogues and concentrate on the film. The main problem with this film is that the dialogue is very poor. If you're looking for a good, solid film, this is not it.

Jeffrey C. photo
Jeffrey C.

I am an avid movie lover. I would never have been able to watch this movie in a theater had it not been for my father. He spent much of his free time in the 1950s and he was in no mood to see a movie that required him to look away. I was a child when I first saw this movie. I was not yet comfortable with the concept of the movie but I did not dislike it at all. I was more concerned with the characters and the relationship between Mary Magdalene and Jesus. I liked this movie but it did not have the emotional impact of the New Testament. I found it to be a good movie but I was not impressed by the story or the actors. I could not identify with the characters. I like a good movie but I prefer a story that makes me feel something. I liked Jesus and Mary Magdalene. I liked their relationship and their friendship. I liked the story and the characters. I liked the movie but I did not find it to be a masterpiece.

Jason photo

The story of Mary Magdalene is one of the most tragic stories ever told. Her last days were filled with pain and suffering, but her beauty and life stood the test of time. While the movie does portray her life in a fairytale way, the movie still shows a fairly accurate picture of the hardships that she faced. The movie does portray Mary as a woman who was torn between faith and her responsibilities as a devout woman. While she was certainly a great mother, she also had a very strong faith that was very important in her life. The movie does portray her as a woman who was haunted by her past and who was almost taken over by her passion for God. The movie also does show that she was a dedicated woman who never gave up on her faith. While she was certainly not a saint, she was a saint in her own right. In the end, she lived her life according to her faith and was able to control her emotions and live a life of complete freedom from sin. The movie shows that she was very blessed with a son and she did spend her life devoted to him. The movie also shows that she had a strong love for her family. While she was never loved by her family, she was loved by her children. The movie also shows that she had an amazing family and she was a very loving mother. While it is a fairytale story, the movie still shows a fairytale life for Mary Magdalene.

Marilyn C. photo
Marilyn C.

I was surprised at how good the movie was, as I usually hate Quentin Tarantino films. This one was just way over the top with a little bit of gore. But the film itself is pretty decent, even if the story was not as strong as the movie would have you believe. It had it's moments of dark humor and good dialogue, but the plot was kind of weak and it didn't give you the right feeling for the characters. There was some really funny parts, but most of the scenes were just depressing. It could have been better if it wasn't so depressing. But that doesn't make it bad. I recommend this film, but only for the special effects and the style of the film. But the film is well worth watching, and it's definitely better than most of Tarantino's films. I would recommend this film to anyone who has an interest in the Catholic church. It has it's good points, and it's bad points, but it's overall a pretty good film. I would give it a 7/10.

Sharon R. photo
Sharon R.

In 1775, on the eve of the great French Revolution, Mary Magdalene, a Jewish girl from France, is sent to a nunnery. In the convent, she is a quiet, devout woman who is also a devout Catholic. When her father dies, she is left to her own devices and starts to question her faith. In 1692, her father is back from France and returns to England. When he finds out about her wandering around Paris and Anne Boleyn, the King's mistress, she runs off with her sister and they go off to live in France. Mary is troubled by her sister's new man, and she becomes more and more devout. Her father also begins to question his faith, and he tells her that the Catholic Church was the cause of all the wars and suffering. Mary also begins to question her faith, and she goes to her mother and begs her to send her back to France. Her mother says that she is the Queen of England, and that she does not want her daughter to return to France. Her mother believes that her daughter was lost and that it was her fault. Mary's mother then changes her mind and sends her back. This film is based on the books written by Leigh Brackett, which are based on Anne Boleyn's diaries. I was surprised to see the nudity, which was not shown in the film. This film is a good movie about religious controversies and has good acting. The film is worth watching.

Lauren Stevens photo
Lauren Stevens

The last time I saw "The Prodigal Son" was back in 2006. As a viewer I saw the film and it seemed to me that the experience was good. However, then I came to the conclusion that it was a long time since I had been able to see the film, but then it occurred to me that I hadn't seen the film in many, many years. So now I watched it again and I was surprised to see that I didn't recognize some of the actors from the past. So I decided to watch it again and see if I remembered them correctly. Yes, I am back! I think that I did recognize all of them, even my memories of seeing the film. I can't tell you what I thought about the film because it would spoil the surprise. What I can tell you is that I think that this film is a great character study of a man who is going through a very difficult time. The Prodigal Son is a man who has a dream that he wants to fulfill and he isn't satisfied with the way that his dream is going. So he decides to leave his wife and the children and goes to live with a friend. He also learns that he can't have a child. He goes through a period of time where he is very unhappy and depressed, but then he learns that he is going to have a child and it is going to be perfect. Then the film becomes a story about how a person is going to deal with this. I thought that this film was very good and very emotional. I would recommend this film to anyone.

Kimberly W. photo
Kimberly W.

The most famous English execution was in 1482 of John Wilkes (the Governor of the Tower of London) for the murder of his two children. The scene of his execution was shown in the Church of St. Mary Magdalene in Dublin, Ireland. The scenes of the executions were filmed in the middle of the day so the audience could see what they were watching. The movie is about John Wilkes' life, but also the things he did during the execution of Mary Magdalene. A lady was convicted of murder, and she was made to endure a whole week of hard labour, but the execution was postponed to avoid the mother of the accused. She did not know that the execution would be postponed. The jury asked the prisoner for a more thorough explanation of the murder, and she finally admitted to the crime, but she did not reveal the motive. This is not the first time that a prisoner was executed and the court made a promise to keep the promise, and it would be a miscarriage if the trial would be postponed. The mother of the accused demanded the execution to be postponed, and the court did not want it to be postponed, so the case was postponed to January of 1525. John Wilkes was captured in February and was kept in prison until he was executed. The movie shows the story of Mary Magdalene, but also the execution of John Wilkes. It is very difficult to be precise in a movie about a long period of time, but I think the movie shows what really happened. This movie is very hard to understand, because the script is hard to follow, and the acting is very bad. The thing I liked about this movie is the atmosphere in which the actors lived. The atmosphere was very real. I did not think that I would feel as I did watching this movie, but I felt that I felt that I was in Ireland. The scenery was very beautiful, and the cinematography was very good. I liked the cinematography and the music. I would say that I would rate this movie a 6. The movie was great, and I would recommend it.

Cheryl Simpson photo
Cheryl Simpson

This is an interesting movie about the history of Mary Magdalene, a nun who lived in the desert and was forced to marry a man of lower rank than herself. She is portrayed as a great saint and it is easy to see how the film could have been more powerful. However, the performances of Anthony Hopkins and Anne Bancroft are excellent. It is fascinating to see how the very different roles they play were completely opposite of each other. Hopkins is played as an extremely humble and loving man, while Bancroft is portrayed as a vicious, brutal and domineering woman. Although the two of them appear different, they work very well together, and it is quite easy to understand why this is. This film is worth seeing, but it is definitely not the best I have ever seen. However, it is very good and it is well worth watching.

Judy Reid photo
Judy Reid

There are many people who have given this movie a very poor rating. However, I think that this is a very accurate depiction of life in ancient Rome. It is truly a depressing story. The movie takes a serious look at the life of Mary Magdalene. If you are looking for a good history lesson, this movie is not for you. However, if you are looking for a good movie, I highly recommend this movie. I give it a B+.

Bruce Young photo
Bruce Young

I recently had the pleasure of viewing "Romeo and Juliet" and having to watch the director's cut. It is a very strong cut that cuts out almost all of the scenes where the two leads are sleeping together. While this change is made to avoid any problems, the entire film, including the parts that are edited out, is very powerful and it is very easy to watch and understand. It is a shame that the final cut was not made because it would have made the film even more powerful. The other good part of the film was the magnificent soundtrack. It has one of the best musical scores ever. I have heard the score before and now I can't get it out of my head. I would recommend this film to anyone who likes a good movie with a message and an artistic look at life. It is the perfect film for the whole family. It is not a big movie but for a family night out it is great.

Dennis H. photo
Dennis H.

Evelyn is a troubled woman who has been married to a man who raped her when she was 12 years old. She has lost her family and her mind, and has even become a recluse in her own house, living with her mother and sister. After some counseling with a psychologist, she decides to write a book about her experience. This book becomes a bestseller, and her life seems to be improving. But Evelyn has secrets that she wants to keep. It's a very well-made film, but it is not perfect. The film takes itself way too seriously, and it sometimes feels like a documentary. The photography is gorgeous, and the cinematography and editing is excellent. The story is very engaging, and the acting is very good. But the story is so moving that it doesn't need the extra pressure that the film-makers put on it. The actors really deserve a standing ovation for their roles, but the story is too strong for the actors to carry it off. And the subject matter of rape and the testimonies of the women who have survived it is a very sensitive one, and it makes the film even more powerful. However, the film does have some flaws. It feels like the director is putting more emphasis on the narration than the story. It is also hard to know what is going on, and it is hard to keep up with all the characters. I think the film would have been better if it was better directed. And it is not a documentary. The film is not exactly an expose of Evelyn's story. The focus is on Evelyn's diary, and it is pretty hard to follow what is going on without knowing what the director is talking about. Also, the film is not all that interesting. It's a great film, but it is not an interesting documentary.

Stephen J. photo
Stephen J.

I know that it's not really a "true" story, but for the sake of this review, I will try to present the story as best I can. The movie itself is a collection of archival footage and interviews from many sources, all the while editing it to fit the time frame. It's basically the story of the rise and fall of Queen Mary Magdalene, but most of the time you have to suspend your disbelief in order to get around that. There is no central figure, there is no central point of view. Instead, it's a collection of people's memories and recollections of their lives during this time. For me, the most fascinating part of the movie was seeing the interactions of the various people involved in the story. They are not just the people who came from the time period, but rather the people who came after it, and the people who were directly impacted by it. I was particularly impressed by the performances of Anne Bancroft, Ed Harris, and Richard Farnsworth. Each person was able to convey both their personal and political history, and their personal relationship with Mary Magdalene. Farnsworth's performance was particularly touching. I found that he seemed to be having a ball with his role. The people I was most impressed with were Anne Bancroft, Helen Mirren, and Bill Nighy. Each person brought their own style to the movie, and their different opinions on Mary Magdalene were fascinating to watch. I also was particularly impressed by Helen Mirren, and felt that she was playing Mary Magdalene in a different manner than I've seen her before. While her portrayal was more serious and less emotional than I've seen from her, I felt that she captured Mary Magdalene in a very different way. I don't know that the film would have been quite as good without the performances, but the personalities of the people involved were still interesting and fascinating to watch. I was very surprised at the accuracy of the film, and how true it was to the time period, and how closely the movie followed the actual time frame. I did not expect it to be a masterpiece, but it was an enjoyable watch and I would recommend it to anyone. Overall, I think it's a good film that should be seen by anyone.

Sean H. photo
Sean H.

I enjoyed watching this movie and I enjoyed the movie. But I did not find it to be as brilliant as the first one. The movie starts out very strong and starts off with a great scene with Thomas's character telling Mary Magdalene to put a lock on the door. The movie gets better and better, but then it gets to a point where Mary Magdalene is at the point of death and she gets to say her last words. But it is not a very convincing last scene. I also felt that the movie could have been better. I really liked the first movie, but I think that it could have been better. It started off strong, but then the story went down hill. But the first movie is still great and I think that it should have stayed that way. I still think that the first movie is the best.

Nicole Delgado photo
Nicole Delgado

This film chronicles the lives of three Irish sisters, Sister Margaret, Sister Anne and Sister Mary Magdalene. They are portrayed by Emily Blunt, Isabelle Huppert and Ruth Wilson. The film has a very strong focus on the lives of the three sisters. Their childhood and adolescence are dramatized in very poignant fashion. While it is a very impressive film, it is not the kind of film that you will watch and think about for a long time afterwards. It is not the kind of film that you will watch and think about for many months after it is over. However, I found it to be very moving. Although the narrative itself is very linear, it is really the subplots that carry the film forward. I do think that the movie would have worked better if the focus had been more on the three sisters and less on the three men. The three men's roles are important, but they are not the main focus of the film. It would have been a more powerful film if the focus had been more on the men. However, the film is still a very strong film. The performances are very strong and the storyline is very strong. However, the film has a few flaws. The editing could have been better, there are some parts where the movie drags, especially towards the end. The movie does a good job of showing how the three women lived in that era, but there is a lack of strong female roles in the movie. They are mostly portrayed as servants and servants only. There are very few female roles in the movie, and this is the one part where the film does a poor job. The editing could also have been a little better. The film has a very good director in Brian De Palma. The editing is good, and there is a lot of detail put into the acting. However, the movie is also very slow. I found the film to be very slow, but I still found it to be a very powerful film. It is a very strong film and I am very happy to have seen it. However, it could have been much stronger. Overall, this is a very strong film. I enjoyed it, but it could have been much better.

Diana B. photo
Diana B.

The early years of Mary Magdalene was set in 1215. The rise and fall of the Roman Catholic church was about to begin. A simple man, with a simple life, was drawn into the world of philosophy, theology and intrigue. His motives were simply selfish. He needed money. So he plotted to marry the Mary Magdalene, the mother of Jesus. After some months of waiting he finally got his hands on her, and started to love her. He was a selfish man, and loved her just for being Mary Magdalene. He wanted her to be his wife. So she became his wife. After all of that, the little boy, who was the Mary Magdalene, would have a son, and the rest of the story would be about how he was raised, and how he would end up becoming a priest. After all of this, the story would be about Mary Magdalene and her life, and what her life was like. We can learn from this film, that it is not always that easy to love another person, to be accepted, to become loved, to be loved back, and to finally end up being loved. But sometimes love just needs time. Sometimes it takes a little time. This film shows us how the Mary Magdalene met with such difficulties, and how she was finally taken in. It also shows us how she ended up being a nun. But what is most important, is that it was the simple man, and not the complicated, evil, conniving man, who ended up with Mary Magdalene. So it was the simple man, not the complicated, evil, conniving man, who ended up with Mary Magdalene.

Joshua O. photo
Joshua O.

I have a vague memory of watching this film at a Catholic school in my teens, but it has never left my mind. The story is really a telling of a few persons, but they are really a little bit like a chorus of the soul. The reason why it does not get more than 5 or 6 stars is that it is not a particularly good film and doesn't seem to have much point or message. There are a couple of sequences which are interesting, but the rest of the film seems very unfinished and not much left to be desired.

Gloria O. photo
Gloria O.

I saw this movie with a group of friends and we all thought it was really good. We all agreed it was the best movie we had seen for awhile. When we heard they had not had any changes from the book, we were shocked. I think it was a great movie. I liked the fact that it was different. I think the movie is good for anyone who loves history, because it shows different things and how it affected different people in different places. Also, I think it is great for everyone because it shows different things about different times and cultures.