Watch Best F(r)iends: Volume 2

Best F(r)iends: Volume 2

Best F(r)iends: Volume 2 is a movie starring Tommy Wiseau, Greg Sestero, and Kristen StephensonPino. Leaving the mortician adrift, the drifter finds himself on an expedition across the Southwest encountering wild and crazy...

Other Titles
Best F(r)iends: Volume Two, Best F(r)iends: Unmasked, Best F(r)iends, Best F(r)iends Volume Two
Running Time
1 hours 33 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Thriller, Drama, Comedy
Justin MacGregor
Greg Sestero
Rick Edwards, Tommy Wiseau, Kristen StephensonPino, Greg Sestero
Audio Languages
English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

Leaving the mortician adrift, the drifter finds himself on an expedition across the Southwest encountering wild and crazy characters through a series of twisted and dark foibles.

Comments about thriller «Best F(r)iends: Volume 2» (32)

Vincent Hayes photo
Vincent Hayes

I saw this movie on TV last night, and I really liked it. It was a very interesting movie, full of suspense. There were also many funny scenes. I would recommend it to anyone who wants to see something that isn't predictable and predictable.

Sean photo

I am a fan of this show and a fan of Clint Eastwood, so I went into this movie with a lot of expectations. I had heard some reviews of it that said it was just another chick flick, so I expected a typical chick flick. However, the way the story unfolds is quite unique. It takes the typical cliche story and twists it. It's not the typical chick flick that will blow your mind and leave you speechless. It's just a good, entertaining movie that doesn't take itself too seriously. It is a lot better than your standard chick flick, with its originality, character development, and sense of humor. I have enjoyed this movie a lot and I recommend it to anyone who is a fan of Clint Eastwood or has any interest in watching a good movie.

Katherine R. photo
Katherine R.

I read the book in school, and I liked it. I liked the first book, but this one is a little more dark. The acting was good, and the story is different. I recommend this to anyone who has not read the book, but even those who have read the book will probably like this movie. The movie has good special effects, good camera work, and the characters are well-acted. There is no better way to end a movie than with a laugh. The best thing about the movie is that it is a continuation of the story. It's like the second book, but this time, they had to make the book and the movie into one. I think this movie was a good way to end a book.

Daniel photo

I love the series of movies. It is a very funny and enjoyable movie. The movies are great, the actors are great, and the movie is very enjoyable. However, this one is better than the first one. It is a little more of a serious movie, and the humor is less. Also, the actors are great, but the story is less. But I still like it a lot. If you like the movies, you will like this one. It is very enjoyable. It is a little more serious, but it is very entertaining.

Stephanie H. photo
Stephanie H.

Here's the thing: you may be a fan of Richard Pryor, but you have to admit that he's got some real charm and he's got some great performances in the films he's done. You know that voice of his that he can say "i'm gonna beat the s*t out of you." and that's what you get from him. The real beauty of his work is his ability to be so crazy and in his best work he can show you his heart and his manliness. But you know what? Richard Pryor is a man, and that's why we watch his films. That's why we love his movies. So go ahead and watch this movie, you may like it. It's a bit too long, but you'll find yourself laughing your head off, and it's a shame that he died before it was released. I recommend this movie to anyone who's a fan of Richard Pryor. I mean you know, you're not going to be as entertained watching him in a comedy as you are watching him in a movie like, say, Malcolm X. But it's a great movie, and I recommend it to everyone.

Julia photo

Director Ryan Reynolds and writer Richard Wenk take a chance on a new story and it is not a good one. The story is good but there are a few plot holes. The only thing that makes the film watchable is some great performances from Robert De Niro, Bob Hoskins and Jeremy Piven. But they are in the minority. If you are looking for a simple and fast paced movie with no real story to follow, then this is the movie for you. I would recommend this to anyone who likes to laugh at movies.

Jane Alvarado photo
Jane Alvarado

I like this movie a lot. I saw it for the first time when it came out on VHS. I watched it a few times. I always enjoyed it. Now I have the DVD. It is still good. It is one of the best movies I have ever seen. I love it. I like the characters. They are well written. The music is great. I have the soundtrack. I am going to buy the soundtrack. I am going to buy the movie and the soundtrack. I like the movie and I have to have it. I will be buying it. I think I am going to watch it again.

Linda photo

First, I will say that I am not a fan of the TV series. I did watch some of the episodes but I did not find them to be that interesting or entertaining. This is not to say that I did not enjoy the first half of the film. The plot was intriguing and had some really great moments in it. I also enjoyed the acting of the main characters. But that is where the fun in this film ends. I was not really impressed with the last hour. It seemed like the movie was being dragged out. I know the film makers were trying to show that this was the real life story of George Bush Jr. but it just did not work for me. I was not sure what the purpose of the film was and I was left feeling unsatisfied and empty. The last hour really did drag the movie out. I think if the film makers had focused more on the character's inner turmoil, the movie could have been better. Overall, I enjoyed the film and it had a few good moments but it really could have been better. The film makers did a good job with the first half but could have been better with the last hour. I rate this film 7/10.

Emma P. photo
Emma P.

I love this movie so much. I've watched it at least twice a day since I got it. It's very funny, very funny. I'm not going to spoil the movie, but I think it is worth watching. It's about the black guy who gets on the wrong side of the law and ends up being a nice guy. He ends up going to a private school for black kids, which ends up being a huge mess. The main character is very funny and very unique. It's a great movie that I can watch over and over again. I really like the fact that they don't really explain anything about what's going on. I think it is very unique and it is very funny. I also like that they don't show the whole thing, but just show the part that's going on. It makes the movie so much better. The only reason I'm giving it a 10 instead of a 9 is because I'm not going to spoil the movie. It is a very good movie and I think it's worth watching.

Judith Stephens photo
Judith Stephens

I really enjoyed this movie. I think this movie is a perfect movie for the younger generation. It is not for everyone but I think that most of us can relate to the situation and what the characters were going through. I think the characters were well written and the actors were great. I think the movie is funny and the actors were very believable. It is definitely a good movie to see with the family. It is a must see.

Shirley photo

Hollow movies are a little like suicide movies. Most of them are fun and harmless. And you can be sure that if the lead actor is a bit of a jerk, you can expect some very witty remarks, a smile and some laughs. You can also expect a lot of shots of the scenery, which will fill the movie. But when it comes to movies like this one, the actors are only a mask. They are not really there. If they are in this film, it is not a surprise. They are just being themselves. That's what I really like about it. The main character is not a fake. It is all his personal story. It is like a movie version of the story of a suicide. This movie is about a young woman, who is an aspiring journalist. She loves the travel and the excitement of the road. So she decides to go to London to study journalism. There she meets an English gentleman, who is also a journalist. They fall in love and get married. They have a child, but it is not the result of their marriage. The child is not a happy one, but they have to face it. In this film, the father is a bit of a jerk, but he is not too bad. He is only trying to save his daughter, who is suffering from a horrible disease. The mother has a certain charm, but it is not enough. They don't really see eye to eye. They are not at all good parents. This film is not really a sad one. It is just a funny one, and I like that. There are some funny scenes in it. Some of the best jokes are in it. It is all about the jokes. I like this movie a lot. It is a comedy of sorts. But it is also a sad one. I also like that. It is about the couple's problems, but also about the problems of a couple. You can either laugh or cry. It is not that I can't find fault with it, but I think the audience is right in not laughing at all. It is just not funny. If you want to see a funny movie, you can go watch it. But if you want a serious film, stay away from this one. It is not worth your time.

Jacqueline photo

I saw this film last night at a friend's house and I'm still reeling from the experience. I remember thinking how good this movie was in the beginning. I was hooked. I kept thinking that I wanted to see it again. The film follows the story of two people, a "white" guy and a "black" guy who are in a relationship. They both hate each other and the movie just keeps going on and on. The acting is good, but the story is what keeps this film going. You don't really get the feeling that anything is wrong, but you do feel like there's something wrong. You don't know if the two people are in love or if they're just in a relationship. I would recommend this film to anyone, but I think it would be a great movie to see with your significant other, or with a friend you don't really like.

Kyle Harris photo
Kyle Harris

I just watched this movie on TV. It was the best movie I have seen in a while. I liked the way that the movie moved from one to another. It was interesting. The movie is about a drug dealer who wants to become a cop. He has a lot of trouble because he can't make friends. He has to deal with his rival. It is really a good movie and I recommend it to everyone. If you are into movies that are funny and entertaining, then this is the movie for you. You might also like the book that it was based on.

Russell photo

This is the best movie I've ever seen. It's hilarious. And also a great story. If you have seen it, you have to see it again. The characters are very well thought out. The ending is also very good. It's very sad, but at the same time, it's very funny. I highly recommend this movie. I would also like to add that it is very rare that a movie is made like this. It's very rare to see a movie that is so funny, so well thought out, and so well written. I think that this is one of the best movies I've ever seen.

Christina V. photo
Christina V.

It's almost impossible to watch this film and not think of it as a movie about the failure of the second world war. The British have a lost cause, and it's up to a handful of Americans to step up and do something about it. Well, this was pretty good. The story is about what happens when a group of American soldiers are left behind in France by their superiors, who have allowed them to return home. As the film opens, they have a small garden in a park and are busy gardening. It doesn't take long before the garden is overrun by rats and soon they have to hide out in a cellar. It's at this point that we find out that they had escaped the war, and they have taken up jobs as personal trainers and gardeners. This is a movie that is very much about the growing and decay of the second world war. We see a small glimpse of what it must have been like, and how it destroyed millions of lives. And then we see what it is like to return home, and the decay and decay that has set in. It's almost as if the film makers are saying that the war should never have been fought in the first place, and that the war should have been fought on the terms that Britain wanted it to be fought. This film was based on a book, but the film is far from being based on that book. The story is really about the failure of the American war effort in the second world war, and the manner in which it was fought. In the end, it's an interesting story that I liked very much. I thought that it was a good movie, but I did think that it was not as good as The Devil's Advocate. But then again, the difference is that The Devil's Advocate was more a documentary, and this film was a movie about war. And the fact that the war in the second world war was lost is a very important part of the film.

Albert Gardner photo
Albert Gardner

This is another take on the "Rambo" movies. It's a little more violent than the first one, but the story is the same. After a long time, it's finally time for Jim to do his thing. The plot: I have to admit that this movie isn't great. I thought it was okay. However, I have to say that I thought that the acting was pretty good. I also thought that it was a lot better than the first movie. The movie was really great. I was surprised when I read the story that it was taken from. The movie is about a guy who has a girlfriend and is about to marry her. However, his family comes to stop the wedding. When the family doesn't like him, they put a gun to his head and kill him. He has to survive and take revenge. There's some suspense in this movie. The first movie was great because it was about the revenge, but in this movie, the revenge is to kill people. I think that the movie was really good. The acting was good, and the story was pretty good. The only problem is that the movie is a little long. I think that it could have been shorter, but I guess that's the way movies are made. It's still good, but I don't think that it's great. Overall, I think that this is a good movie. I think that it's really good.

Lori photo

With such a vast and diverse range of actors, from respected actors like Tom Hanks, Julia Roberts, and Sean Penn to the fringe characters and aliens in "Charmed" (now all but dead), this film is a big fan favorite. It is much darker than most of the previous installments. Unlike most of the others, it doesn't have a large amount of action. Instead it has a good mixture of serious drama and action. The good actors and actresses in this film are the best. There is no one you wouldn't like in this film. Although this film is an action film, there are a few moments where it is very funny. I recommend this film to anyone who is into the series, even if you are not. I think the movie would be better if it was in 3-D, because the 3-D is very nice. I give this movie an 8/10. The sequel is due out in October 2009. I will buy it when it comes out.

Zachary photo

The second and final film in the highly successful series of the same name, this film tells the story of the second edition of the annual Snowball fight. In the previous film we met our main character again, Mike, who was forced to fight and outrun a killer snowball. This time, he is forced to fight again, but with an even bigger target in mind. It's still the same, but now it's a giant mutant snowman. I'm not sure why they kept the name "Snowball" in the title, but it was something to do with the contest, but no more than that. The film itself is pretty enjoyable, but there are a few holes. The characters are pretty bland and some of them are pretty stupid, but the one that really got to me was Joe. Joe is one of the most unlikable characters in the entire franchise. I mean, you want him to win, but he just doesn't. The main problem is that he is just a pretty stupid character. There is just no character in this film that you could actually like. This is a big problem because it is the point of the movie, and it is trying to be a good film, but I just couldn't get into it. Also, the "love story" that is going on between the two main characters is kind of ridiculous. Overall, it's not a bad film, but it's just not the most interesting one in the entire franchise. I did enjoy the first film, but this is not nearly as good. The main characters in this film are pretty weak and the love story between them is kind of ridiculous. I recommend this film to fans of the franchise, but not to fans of the original series. The film does have its own problems, but it's still enjoyable enough to watch.

Walter photo

This is a good and entertaining movie, but it is not a true sequel to the first movie. It was made as a prequel to the first movie, but was not part of the original movie. The movie has the same story as the first movie, but this time around, the main character is in the military and his wife is pregnant. The movie is good and entertaining, but it is not as good as the first movie.

Jack B. photo
Jack B.

I was surprised to see that the director of "F(r)iends" (1997) was also the director of the TV series "F(r)iends" (1992) and the "Archie Comics" spin-off "F(r)iends: Volume One". The two directors are completely different, but this film does have some similarities. The plot: "F(r)iends: Volume 2" (2016) tells the story of a low-budget freelance writer named Dave (Kieran Culkin) who moves to a new town with his girlfriend (Jena Malone) to start a new job. They're not very happy with the direction of life and they try to make some money as they become friends with a couple of other freelancers. But a brutal gunman named Dwayne (Lance Henriksen) is also looking for a little more money and he's after Dave and his girlfriend, who are the only ones who can help him. I can't say that the film is the best because there's some flaws, but it's definitely a film worth seeing. I really enjoyed this film, because I like the two actors, and I also like the directing, and I also really liked the film, and I think that this film is pretty good, and I recommend it to people. I don't think that the film is very good, but I think that it's good and I think that the film is worth seeing. My vote is seven. Title (Brazil): "F(r)iends: Volume 2" ("F(r)iends: Volume 2" in the U.S.)

Judith photo

The first movie is pretty much the best of the trilogy, but if you have the patience, watch the second. The movie has a lot of good things in it. I would rate it a 7 out of 10. For some reason it got really bad ratings on IMDb, I guess that some people are afraid of having to watch it again. I am going to watch it again, so don't tell me that you can't, I can't wait to watch it again.

Danielle Alvarado photo
Danielle Alvarado

A few months after we saw the first film, the second film came out and I was very excited to see it. I had no idea what to expect but I loved it! It was very well made and the characters were all good. I don't understand the negative reviews about this movie. I liked it. It was entertaining and the characters were very likable. I also liked the ending, although I didn't like the way they handled the bomb. I also thought it was a bit dark, but it was also very enjoyable. It was funny at times, and I thought it was really well made. I would definitely recommend this movie to anyone.

Carol M. photo
Carol M.

Sidney Lumet's first and only movie is a raunchy parody of the cowboy movies of the 50's and 60's. In this case, the films were directed by Sam Peckinpah and edited by William Friedkin, the two most prolific filmmakers of the 60's. They made their mark on the genre with "The Wild Bunch" (1959), "Varsity Blues" (1960), "The Wild Bunch 2: Dirty Deeds" (1962), "The Wild Bunch 3: Shootout at the OK Corral" (1964), and "The Wild Bunch 4: Waco" (1967). The films are all highly stylized and elaborate in their depiction of high-minded, "exotic" cowboy characters, played by big name stars. But in the 50's, they were well-made films, and some of them are still entertaining. The problem is that they are all very short, and I don't think that they should be re-released on DVD. I'd love to see some of them remade, but that's probably not possible, so I'll just be watching them on TV. "The Wild Bunch 2" is the best. It's much more than a spoof of the films of the 60's, and it's not about the characters themselves. It's about the films themselves, the big stars, the plot, and the history of western movies. This is a fun movie to watch on TV, but it's not the kind of movie you want to have on DVD. The same goes for "Sidney Lumet's F(r)iends 2."

Cynthia B. photo
Cynthia B.

A mild comedy. I liked the characters. And a few laughs. A well executed script and decent direction. The ending was a bit rushed. Some things felt too much like a cop out. Still a very enjoyable movie. It's a shame that it doesn't have the star power of the first one. But it's still worth seeing.

William Martin photo
William Martin

I liked this movie for two reasons. 1. The acting and acting. 1. The story line. 2. The casting. 1. Acting - The acting was fantastic. It wasn't as good as "Lethal Weapon 2" but it was great. 2. The acting - the plot is just as good as the first. The cast is great. They were funny, passionate, and sexy. The actors are great in this movie. My favorites were Hugh Grant, Brad Pitt, and James Franco. I also liked the acting of Dennis Quaid. I don't think it is as good as the first, but it is better than the second. I liked it better than the first one, but I don't think it is better than the second. I don't know what it is, but it just doesn't cut it for me. I thought this movie was good, but I am not sure what it is. It just doesn't cut it for me. I just don't know. I hope this is the last movie for Hugh Grant, and I hope he returns for "The World's End". My favorite line of the movie was "I love you, honey." It is one of my favorite lines from the first movie. If I could give this movie a lower rating, I would.

Mary H. photo
Mary H.

The second volume of the "The Last Mission" is one of the best of the series. The movie is very funny. And there is plenty of funny jokes. The acting is good. The movie also has a few other surprises. I rate this one 7/10.

Robert Brewer photo
Robert Brewer

I didn't even know that there were sequels to the first one until I saw this. I'm so glad I decided to watch it because I don't think I'd have known if I hadn't seen this movie. It's really, really good. I really like how the director handles the movie. There's a lot of humor, which I don't think I've ever seen in a movie before. There are also a lot of dramatic moments, which are very funny. The acting is great and the characters are really well developed. I really like how the movie is shot and the way it's filmed. The camera moves around really well and it gives the movie a very unique feel. It's really hard to find a movie that's this good and this entertaining. I highly recommend this movie to anyone who wants to see a good comedy with some drama. 10/10

Paul photo

I have just come from a screening of this movie, and I can tell you that this movie is simply a masterpiece. The acting is superb, the plot is brilliant, the dialog is clever and the story is totally engrossing. There is no need to be a critic on this movie, because it is simply a gem. It is one of those movies that you can watch and not regret. I have read a few reviews on this movie, and I think they are very misleading. The only thing they can say is that it is not a very good movie. The movie is simply a masterpiece. You don't need to be a critic to enjoy this movie, because it is just a wonderful experience.

Lawrence Pearson photo
Lawrence Pearson

In my opinion, this is one of the better Stephen King films. The story is very well-written, and the characters are developed well. There is a nice touch of humor that really makes this film stand out. The acting in this film was very good, and the direction is very good. There are a lot of twists and turns, but they are really well-executed. This is definitely worth watching. It is the best Stephen King film that I have ever seen. I hope you enjoy this film as much as I did.

Aaron Willis photo
Aaron Willis

Sydney Lassick's second feature film about the downfall of the white working class, she creates a very interesting film with the backdrop of the 1960's. When the white working class is threatened by the Soviet Union, the masses of the working class turn to drugs, crime, and terrorism. It's a realistic portrayal of the lives of the working class. But I think that some of the characters in the film are stereotyped. The main character, Robin (Lassick) is played by Jessica Lange who is an actress, she's pretty but doesn't really act that well. Her character is pretty bland and she seems to be in a constant state of shock when the main character Robin says she hates everything. Then there is the character of Billy (Eddie Griffin) who is a little more sympathetic. His character is a bit stereotypical as well, he's a drug dealer who is afraid of going to jail and has a low IQ. When he sees the aftermath of the incident he is shocked to see that he is the only one who survived the ordeal. It's hard to get your bearings when watching this film, and it's not the most engaging of films. But it's worth a watch, you can tell that Lassick and Griffin had some fun making this film.

Craig photo

This movie is a great mix of drama, comedy, and action. It is an excellent movie for the whole family. I really enjoyed it. I really do recommend this movie.

Scott M. photo
Scott M.

I am a big fan of this film. It has great performances by the cast and some very interesting characters. This film is a true representation of the experience of being in the "middle of nowhere" and living with no money and no way to communicate. I will admit I was on the edge of my seat the entire time. I am a huge fan of Kevin Bacon, and I think he does a great job portraying a character who is a coward and is afraid to fight back, yet still has the strength to make a difference. The love interest, played by Mimi Rogers, is a great character and is a true hero. The film is very realistic and a must see for all film buffs.