Watch Science Fair

Science Fair

Science Fair is a movie starring Jack Andraka, Anjali Chadha, and Ramy Khodeir. Nine high school students from disparate corners of the globe navigate rivalries, setbacks, and hormones on their quest to win the international science...

Running Time
1 hours 30 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Darren Foster, Cristina Costantini
Jeff Plunkett, Cristina Costantini, Darren Foster
Jack Andraka, Anjali Chadha, Serena McCalla, Ramy Khodeir
Audio Languages
English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

Nine high school students from disparate corners of the globe navigate rivalries, setbacks, and hormones on their quest to win the international science fair. Only one can be named "Best in Fair."

Comments about documentary «Science Fair» (21)

Jacob photo

The creators of the Cro-Mags were talented filmmakers who never made a dime. They tried to get money to produce a movie that would give the Cro-Mags the recognition they deserved. I thought the movie was interesting and very educational. The Cro-Mags were used as a source of inspiration for the work of an artistic medium. They were the inspiration for the abstract form that artists use to express themselves. This was an amazing film and a must see.

Danielle photo

The movie starts with a montage of the boys trying to meet girls in college. They hang out in dorm rooms, they attend parties, and they end up talking about girls to each other. The boys also get involved in various activities, such as basketball. As the story continues, we see how the boys get involved in various activities and how their lives go through ups and downs. We also see the boys' fathers, who are very important to the boys and who help them with the things they need to do in order to make it to college. The film does a good job of showing the boys' parents, which is a good thing. The parents are also very important to the boys, and we see how they try to help them. The acting in the movie was very good. There were a few scenes where they showed the boys' acting talents and they did a very good job of portraying the boys in their typical boyish ways. The boys also do a good job at convincing us that the boys are not really gay, although it seems that they are. They are just "straight boys" in a way. There is also a bit of humor in the movie, which was a nice touch. Overall, the movie was very good and I highly recommend it to anyone who is a fan of this genre of movies. The movie was very entertaining and I think the boys did a very good job portraying their characters.

Christopher Jenkins photo
Christopher Jenkins

The whole concept of the Museum of Modern Art is flawed, and the worst part is that the government didn't care about the students in it. I had some trouble understanding the emphasis in the documentary. Is it more about the artworks than about the people? I also don't like the idea that the government would give a significant amount of money to an institution that is dedicated to teaching art and nothing else. Also, I found the videos to be educational, but I didn't understand the context. To me, the theme of the museum seemed like a propaganda tool of the government. As I said, I'm sure it was meant to be educational, but I think the museum is to be taken seriously, and not as a place to put artworks on display. If you want to learn about modern art, go to the National Gallery, and see what they show.

Christina photo

I'm giving this a 7 because I believe it to be a very important piece of information that most people have not had the opportunity to experience. First of all, it is a docudrama. That's about it. You can't sit through the whole thing without having some idea of what is going on, but once you do, it is actually quite interesting. The two main characters are actually quite engaging. I also liked the way the film was shot and the music. The film is not like a typical documentary. I think this is one of the best documentaries I have ever seen. It is very well made and the quality of the production is very high. It is a story about the real life problems facing many girls around the world. The film was not made to get the facts right, it was made to get the idea of what girls go through everyday. The story of a girl in Kazakhstan who goes through a lot of problems was interesting to me because it showed that girls were not being treated equally around the world. There are more problems for girls than boys in many parts of the world, and that is the main message of the documentary. It is not a documentary about girls in any country, it is a documentary about girls around the world. If you like documentaries and want to know more about girls and girls problems, this is a great one to watch. It is not a documentary about the problems girls have in schools, it is a documentary about girls in schools. And it is very well made.

Tiffany W. photo
Tiffany W.

The film aims to do two things: to reflect on the many social and political challenges we face in modern society, and to demonstrate how the human brain can be used to overcome those challenges. The main character, Carine, is an art history student in Paris, who is trying to prove to her parents that her paintings aren't real. She can't seem to find a way to prove that they aren't real, but when she starts to exhibit her work at a school where she has to explain the technicalities of her work, she starts to discover the true nature of her work, and discovers that it's not so simple as she had assumed. The film is somewhat fragmented, and it ends on a somewhat weak note. However, it is an impressive and revealing film. It shows the human brain in the 21st century, and how our society, and even the brain itself, are being used for the benefit of the rich. The main character has some pretty impressive concepts, such as the concept of reality. The brain is a complex organ, and it can be used to "realize" many things, which are not simply projections of our mind, but can be easily recognized and understood by our senses. The concept of reality is something that we all know, and we know that our brain is using it to help us realize that we're not alone. If our brain helps us to understand that our society is flawed, and that we should not leave the comfort of our home, it will help us realize that we are not alone. We can work together to understand what it means to be a human being, and how we can be on the side of the angels. If you have ever had the idea that you have to work as hard as possible, to "realize" your dreams, this film will be a very interesting and challenging experience. It will help you see that your brain is not so fragile as you might have thought, and it will help you realize that your dreams are not so simple as you thought.

Brandon photo

This is a movie that is a little bit better than some of the others I've seen, mainly because it is shorter. I've seen a lot of movies, but I can't say I've seen a movie with as much depth as this one. The movie is about 4 groups of people who come together to make a movie about their college experiences, how they all meet, the school they went to, and their ultimate school. I also enjoyed the end, which is also short, but I'm not sure how I feel about it. This is a movie that is short, but I felt that the movie could've been better. The performances are decent, but I would've liked to see more of the college students in the movie. The dialog is great and there are some great quotes, such as the college student who said "Forget about it, they're not dead!" or the guy who said, "We're not hurting anybody." I'm really impressed that this movie was made, because it's an incredible work of art, and it's really worth watching.

Janice R. photo
Janice R.

This documentary is a collection of short stories from various writers and filmmakers, collected as an audio book. Some are clearly written for the purpose of making a movie, while others are for the purpose of making a documentary. This is a very unusual, yet extremely enjoyable movie. It is very interesting to see the different techniques used to make the story and the different techniques used to get the story in the movie. The stories are all very different, and they are all interesting. The audio books are almost always funny, and that is always a plus. It is a bit unusual to have a collection of stories that are almost all stories about people with disabilities. It is also interesting to see how these stories are narrated. The audio books often seem to be very different, and that is also a plus. In this collection, one might find several stories that are about deaf people, and one might find a couple stories about other people with disabilities. It is interesting to see that this collection of stories is mostly one long story, as they are all mostly short stories. The audio books are also very different, and they are almost always funny. I recommend this collection to any movie-buff who likes different, interesting movies. This collection is a must-have for anyone who likes to hear different stories, or anyone who likes to hear different voices.

Henry Mendez photo
Henry Mendez

Tasty to watch, but somewhat boring. There are good comments on how the screen was made and I thought it looked quite good. But, overall it was very superficial. The subject of the film was clearly missing. I did not know how to feel about the film, except that it was good. It did have some good points, but I was missing the story. I think the real point of the film is to show how the screen is made, so it would be more realistic to use a home video camera to make the film, but in this case the producers have not really gone that far. Maybe next time.

John G. photo
John G.

The idea of using the audience's imagination and not telling a story is not new. But this was done with great care and great skill. The movie is not only about the girls but also about their parents and how they dealt with the sudden death of their baby. It is very touching. The movie will stay with you and give you lots of ideas about life, love and loss. This movie is definitely worth the watch and a must see.

Brandon W. photo
Brandon W.

I saw this film when it first came out and thought it was great. The set up of the "Lecture Hall" is great. The students from a "local" college spend the day learning and thinking about math. However, the real magic of this film comes from the interaction between the group. It is a very interesting, but "hidden" bit of the film. The students all seem to be a little more comfortable with the film than they would have been before. At times the film seems more like a small talk piece. The students seem to be a little more willing to share their thoughts and opinions about math. It is interesting to see the different viewpoints. At the end of the film, I was surprised at how many different opinions people had about math. One student was so convinced that she was a genius that she couldn't admit that she wasn't. Another was so confused that she was constantly asking other students questions about math. But many other people were accepting of the idea that they weren't as smart as they thought. One of the students even talked about how hard it was for her to remember all of the names of her classes. Overall, the film was interesting to watch and was great to learn more about the students.

Sandra G. photo
Sandra G.

A couple of days ago I went to the Chinese restaurant that I've always used as a stopover before going to Tokyo and I have to say that the place was actually quite pretty good. I've always liked the street style of the restaurant, with a mix of casual and formal atmosphere. I wasn't expecting anything more than a good time and I think that this movie is a nice introduction to that kind of restaurant, with some humor. The movie is mostly about the owners and their son who is trying to take over the restaurant. They've found a way to be very serious while remaining very silly. They are really trying to do their best with it. However, it doesn't really work. In the beginning of the movie the director tried to show how much care the owners take to make the restaurant really good. But, the problem is that they don't do it. The director wanted to show the hard work that the owner takes, but it's not enough. This movie is better than that movie in some ways, but that's not saying much. It's good, but it's nothing special. If you're looking for a good comedy, you can check this out, but if you're looking for something else, I would say to wait until you can get the DVD, as it may be better if you watch it on the TV. 7/10

Julie H. photo
Julie H.

This movie is an intelligent commentary on the 'gimmicks' of the large bureaucracy that governs the lives of most American children. I was surprised that this movie was not directed by a major director; it appears to be a labor of love. It has a good script and excellent acting. There are very few 'gimmicks' in this movie, so if you are interested in the life of a middle schooler, you will enjoy this film. I think the movie is very balanced, making room for all of the opinions that we see in middle school, as well as presenting a balanced view of the problems facing these kids. It is an important film to be shown at any educational facility. You should see it.

Amanda photo

I can see why people hate this film. It's a bit hard to sit through the whole thing, because you really have to be awake to get the most out of it. The film itself is pretty well done, with the direction and cinematography (I am no film critic), but it seems like the way this was made is not a very good way to make a film. What's really odd is that most of the reviewers here seem to be calling it a masterpiece. I think it's just as good as, or better than, some of the films that it criticizes. Some of the techniques used in the film (like the recording of the voices, the use of the black and white camera, etc.) are pretty impressive. All in all, it's a worthwhile film, but I can't help but feel that this film could have been a lot better. All in all, I think it's worth watching, but only if you can get through the first 15 minutes of the film, or if you're really bored. I wouldn't recommend this film for most people.

David photo

I went to the TV movie theater in Atlanta for this show. The movie was an odd mix of commercials, sitcoms, and TV movies. The theater was full of people from all walks of life. People like me, who are used to seeing commercials for companies that are at the bottom of the food chain. As I watched this, I kept thinking, "If I didn't know better, I'd think this was the actual movie!" It was the kind of movie I would have paid to see at a movie theater. It was a complete lie. I know that it was fictional, but it didn't have to be. I was expecting to see commercials for things like Advil, but I didn't see any. The show was more of a "reality show" and not like the show, but it just didn't hit the mark. I would have to say that this is probably one of the worst movies I have ever seen. It really was the first movie I have ever walked out of. I hope the ratings on this are way down. I hope that this movie is the last for many people.

Pamela Stone photo
Pamela Stone

This was a good documentary about a group of hackers, known as the SCADA hackers. I have seen the same movie in a history class, and I must say that this was a good documentary. It's about a group of hackers that were known as SCADA hackers, who were involved in breaking into many different types of computers, including the military. The SCADA hackers were also known for hacking into the computers that control everything from street lights to gas pumps. In this documentary, you can see them hacking into the computers that control power, traffic lights, and other vital functions in your home. The documentary is a little bit slow, but I enjoyed it. The documentary is pretty accurate, and it is actually pretty scary when you see some of the things that they hack into. I recommend this documentary for anyone who wants to know more about SCADA hacking, because it's a pretty interesting topic. I give it a 7/10.

Theresa F. photo
Theresa F.

A lot of this film is black and white with colored subtitles. That's not a problem. I don't mind. The white text is important for clarity, and you have to understand what is happening at that time. I like the way that the director laid it out, showing different stages of the "white kid" experience. He got so many perspectives on what happened and how he got there, that the viewer doesn't need to know the whole story. I liked the way he presented the "black kid" experience. He showed the actor's point of view as well as the point of view of the people around him. He also showed the story as it happened, how he got there and what he experienced. I liked the way he used the old Polaroid photos of the actors to show us what was happening. The way he presented the story was very moving. I think that most of the film is moving. That is why I gave this film a 7 out of 10. I think it is an interesting film. It does show the life of an ordinary young black boy who does not have any rights and no one cares about him. He is doing all the things he is supposed to be doing, yet he is not treated like a human being. He is not treated like a human being. He is seen as a child. This film did not try to explain the story or make it an educational film. The director just wanted to show what happened and how he got there. It was really important to show the experience of the black kid as it happened. I also think that it is important to show that it is possible to get to where he got to, and what he did to get there. In the end, I think that the director got it right.

Phillip photo

On the way home from college one day, a bus stops for a late night stop at a tiny apartment. Its occupants, a young couple, are going to be the first ones to get a three bedroom apartment in a high rise. But this is not an ordinary high rise. It is a famous neo-Gothic-looking building, the Ritz, with towering ceilings, ornate furniture, and private gardens. And there is a legendary author, who is the author of a book entitled "Cure". The man behind the project, a man named Max Fischer, is not content with this one room apartment. He wants to make it into a 'gothic' estate, complete with a large library, art gallery, cinema and a private theatre. The film opens with him saying that he will 're-purpose' the building to house a 'gothic-looking' artist. He is soon to be the curator of the whole estate, including the 'gothic-looking' artist, so his true name and the story behind him will not be revealed until the end of the film. To start off the film, the couple that is going to live in the Ritz is Max Fischer and his wife. Max, has a bright future ahead of him. He is an engineer with a good job, has a beautiful girlfriend, and a beautiful apartment in the Ritz. But he does not have much to say about his future, because he does not have much to say. At the beginning of the film he was very enthusiastic about his project. He would describe how it would change his life and how he would be able to pursue his dream of a great writer. However, as the film progressed, he lost interest in his project, and thought of other things to do. And as the film progressed, his plans became less and less realistic. And his wife had started to become more and more dissatisfied with his plans. Eventually, the couple found themselves to be in a life crisis. Max was starting to feel like he was losing his grip on his life, and his wife felt the same way. Max had made a promise to his girlfriend that he would find a way to save her from a hopeless situation, but he was unable to find a solution. Eventually, Max realized that he would have to give up on his dream, and his girlfriend had to give up on her dream. Max was sad to see the couple in a dead end. Eventually, he started to find it easier to just let the couple go. He was able to begin his new life in a different way. But the couple was able to find a new home, and the Ritz became the new home of the couple. And Max realized that he had not done anything for his dream. He had merely borrowed the idea of his dream and helped others to realize his dream. Max was not successful in saving his girlfriend. She had started to feel the same way. And eventually, she too realized that she had to give up on her dream. But Max realized that his new life was

Kenneth P. photo
Kenneth P.

I had the privilege of attending the New Jersey Museum of Technology's Digital Arts Lab last night. At the time of my visit, the lab was a success, with the first batch of new projects on display and a new exhibit about the LASIK surgical procedure. The lab's first exhibition, "Nanotechnology in Life Sciences", is an interesting exploration of nanotechnology in biological and medical systems. It's divided into four separate projects, each with a brief history. Each project focuses on one or more nanotechnology themes, such as 3-D printing, 3-D printing with stem cells, and "microfluidics" (microfluidic) in biological systems. The best part of the exhibit is the very first of the four projects, "Inspired Materials." The lead scientist, Lauren Farina, is a genius in the field of biotechnology and one of the best lecturers I've ever heard of. She uses a fantastic video projection and a lot of diagrams to give an inside look at the concept of nanotechnology. She even has an artist create a wonderful illustration of the process of creating a new material. The second project, "Transport-Based Nanotechnology," by Alessandro Arcuri, is an excellent presentation of the possibility of using nanotechnology to make efficient and reliable transportation. It also has a very interesting presentation on what it would mean to make transportation better. The third project, "Protein Manufacturing", by Stephen Thaber, is a great example of how we might be able to manufacture nanotechnology proteins. The fourth project, "Bioenergetics," by Rachel Poulson, is a fascinating presentation of the concept of bioenergetics. I was curious to know how these projects are progressing and what the future holds for them. It's an interesting and interesting presentation. The project at the end of the exhibit, "Learning for Life," by Tia Cadell, is really interesting. It's a great presentation on how nanotechnology can be used in the medical field to improve the quality of life for all people. I would recommend the New Jersey Museum of Technology's Digital Arts Lab to anyone looking to learn more about nanotechnology in life sciences. I think it's a great education for the general public. It's one of the best exhibits I've ever seen at a museum.

Maria Alvarado photo
Maria Alvarado

I saw this film at a film festival here in Spain and I am pretty impressed. It is a great overview of the idea of a DNA assembly line. It was so intriguing that I read the book after. This is a documentary about how this process works. The actors are amazing, and I loved the soundtrack. I would say it is the best documentary I've seen in the last years. I highly recommend to anyone who has a love for science and its history.

Adam Gordon photo
Adam Gordon

This is an interesting look at a rather unique science fair. It's one that many (including myself) have never heard of. It is about a young man named Mason Perkins who was the first to actually enter a national science fair. He didn't get the attention that he was hoping for. He was very competitive, and got frustrated by people constantly calling him names. He did end up winning a prize, however, and the title of "the best science fair entrant." Mason Perkins (Adam Shankman) is interviewed by a producer for the film, who told Mason he was the "best entrant" in the last national science fair. He wanted to share the experience with him. As the film goes on, Mason starts to become more and more jealous of the people who are always calling him names, and starts to feel that they were more important than him. This is one of those movies that is really hard to put into words. It's really fascinating to watch. It's full of real events, and real people. I felt like I was in Mason's shoes, and really felt like I was part of the science fair. Overall, I liked the film. It was funny and interesting. It's not just for those who like science fairs. It's one that I would recommend.

Laura Stephens photo
Laura Stephens

On a recent trip to the Bronx, we saw an amazing demonstration of one man's drive to solve a long-standing problem. Some of his ideas might be familiar to anyone who has been to high school, but others were new to me. I enjoyed the film, but I wish that it had a better story to tell. It is the story of a man who has dedicated his life to making the world a better place. He has built the most elaborate toy factory and works with a young boy to improve the educational standards of his town. But the school board won't accept his school, and the community is afraid of him. He is very successful in this, and many people do want him to move to their town. But the community will not go along with him. I will leave it up to the viewer to decide if this film has a good story to tell. Overall, I found it entertaining, but I wish that it had a story that was more interesting. But I'll still give it a 7.0. (7/10)