Watch Les frères Sisters

Les frères Sisters

Les frères Sisters is a movie starring John C. Reilly, Joaquin Phoenix, and Jake Gyllenhaal. In 1850s Oregon, the infamous duo of assassins, Eli Sisters (John C. Reilly) and Charlie Sisters (Joaquin Phoenix), chase a gold prospector...

Other Titles
淘金殺手, Ha'akhim Sisters, Los hermanos Sisters, Sistersi vennad, Bracia Sisters, Braća Sisters, Testvérlövészek, Os Irmãos Sisters, Broliai Sistersai, The Sisters Brothers, Golden River, Brāļi Sisteri, I fratelli Sisters, Οι αδελφοί Σίστερς, Gôruden Rivâ, Sistersin veljekset, Sisters Biraderler, ゴールデン・リバー
Running Time
2 hours 2 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Western, Crime, Drama
Jacques Audiard
Thomas Bidegain, Patrick DeWitt, Jacques Audiard
John C. Reilly, Riz Ahmed, Joaquin Phoenix, Jake Gyllenhaal
Belgium, Spain, USA, France, Romania
Audio Languages
English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

In 1850s Oregon, the infamous duo of assassins, Eli Sisters (John C. Reilly) and Charlie Sisters (Joaquin Phoenix), chase a gold prospector and his unexpected ally.

Comments about western «Les frères Sisters» (21)

Andrew L. photo
Andrew L.

Well, what can I say? I love this film, and I think that it is one of the best westerns ever made. The story is not that hard to follow, and the dialogue is simply superb. The performances are outstanding. The two leads, Jeremy Irons and Joan Allen, are brilliant in their roles. It's a shame that most westerns these days are predictable. This film is, however, not. I'm not going to tell you anything about the story, because you'll have to see it to find out. Suffice it to say that the movie is a coming-of-age tale. As you watch the movie, you'll be left with the impression that you are watching a true story. I feel that this is one of the reasons that I like this film so much. It's so beautiful, and so wonderfully acted. I don't know what I would do if I had the chance to be a young boy and the protagonist of the story was my dad. I would be completely different, and I would have a whole lot of courage. That's the kind of courage that we all need. I hope you'll watch it and love it as much as I do.

Nicholas Hudson photo
Nicholas Hudson

Bryan Singer directs this remake of the 1949 classic of the same name. The film stars Jennifer Connelly as Marie-Josee Croze, a 17 year old girl who lives in a small town and is an artist. When the town is invaded by a gang of outlaws, Marie-Josee is sent to take care of the girls, who are the only family that has not been killed. She is the only woman in the village, and it is a difficult task to raise the kids. The film is a bit slow, and the story is a bit different from the original. However, it is a well done film, and one that will be a classic for some time. The acting was pretty good, and I loved the supporting characters, especially the one who was the village's sheriff. Overall, I would say that the film was good, but it is not a classic. The story was good, but the story was not that great, and there were a few parts that were a bit strange. I do recommend the film, but it is not a classic. 7/10.

Ruth photo

This is a film that is well worth seeing for the excellent performances of the two leads, and the charming story. It's also a good film for the general audience. The performances are superb, and the story is quite interesting. The two leads, Banderas and Winslet, are both excellent. The story is a bit of a mess, but it's still a good movie to watch. It's also a good film for a rainy day.

Rachel N. photo
Rachel N.

I remember seeing the trailer for this movie and just thinking "Why?" I would have been more interested in the two brothers fighting over a bottle of whiskey. So when I heard that the movie was being remade into a TV series I was very excited. The movie was good and I loved the movie. But it was so much better than the original. I loved the movie. It was just too many great parts. The cast is great. I think it is just the right mix of the two brothers. I would have liked more of the older brother. I would have liked the younger brother to be more fleshed out. The movie was not to long but it was a good movie. I would say it is worth the watch.

Linda photo

I've been a fan of Clint Eastwood since I was a kid. I am an admirer of his work as a director, and he has a way of making me appreciate his films. I'm not sure why, but I think the film I saw last night was one of his most interesting to date. I'll admit that I was skeptical about this film, as I wasn't expecting much from it. I was wrong. I think this film is a tribute to the Old West. It's not a glorified Western. It's a film about a young man, Jesse James, who comes to the West in order to find his lost love. He meets a very different set of people along the way. The film is an excellent character study of two men, one of them very different from the other. Clint Eastwood makes the most of his actors, and has some of the best scenes in the film. He has a way of making his actors look and sound like their characters. This is something that is very difficult to do, and it's a skill that I've never seen Eastwood do before. The performances are very good. Daniel Craig and Eastwood both give good performances. They both have a way of making you feel for the characters, and both do it well. The only problem I had with this film was the dialogue. I felt that there were some parts of the film that were too long and a bit too slow. It was a bit of a drag, but I think it was all part of the story. I think the problem is that the film would have benefited from more action. It is a slow film, but the action is well done. It's a shame that the action is a bit of a drag, because I thought the film would be a lot better if they focused on it more. The acting is a good three out of five stars. Clint Eastwood is a great director. He is one of the best, and the best film director I've ever seen. This is one of his most interesting films, and I would recommend it to anyone who likes Westerns. It is well worth seeing.

Jason photo

I'll keep this brief. I'd seen the trailer for this film and liked the way it was shot. But I thought the story line was a little too melodramatic and was a little too predictable. The cinematography was great. It was well shot and the camera work was really good. The action was great. I really enjoyed the story line and the direction. But the acting was lacking. I didn't like the way they played the two main characters. I liked the way the movie started off but it really dragged on for a while. I'd recommend this film to those who like a good story, but don't like melodrama.

Joseph photo

I have to admit I was a little bit skeptical of this movie. I wasn't really looking forward to it. It seemed to have been shot over a very short time and there were some good looking actors. I just didn't know what to expect from this movie. I was right on the mark with my expectation. This movie is a good character study of a tough Texas Ranger. The plot is a little convoluted but it does keep the viewer interested. The performances were good, especially from Jake Gyllenhaal. He gives a great performance and it is refreshing to see a performance from a young actor in a major movie. This is an interesting movie to watch. I give it a 7.5/10.

Crystal photo

This is a wonderful movie. I loved the acting, the scenery, the music. I'm not a fan of westerns, but this was just wonderful. I would recommend this movie to anyone.

Diane photo

I have seen this movie a few times and I have to say that I don't really like it. First of all, it is not the best movie ever made, but it has its moments, and that's it. I have never seen this movie before and I didn't know it was based on a true story until I saw the trailer. I saw that this movie is based on a true story and that's why I didn't like it. The acting is pretty good, but I guess it's not enough to make this movie good. I think the actors had a good time and I like that, but the movie is just not good enough. I don't understand why some people like this movie so much. It is not a masterpiece, but it has its moments. And the actors in this movie do their job well, but it doesn't make up for the bad acting. Overall, I don't like this movie and I don't recommend it to anyone.

Aaron M. photo
Aaron M.

This movie was very good. It had a very dark atmosphere and a good story. I really enjoyed this movie and I'm not a big fan of westerns or arty movies. I think the reason why I didn't like this movie as much as I expected is because the story wasn't that original. I really didn't care for the characters and the story just seemed a little rushed and I didn't care for the ending either. I think the reason why I enjoyed this movie so much is because I'm a huge fan of westerns. I really liked the story of "The Searchers" and "Lone Wolf and Cub" and this movie was pretty close to them. It had some great action scenes and I really liked the fact that the movie was set in the 1800s. I really loved the idea of the westerns and I think the story was pretty good. I really liked this movie. It was good and I think that the movie would have been much better if they had done a better job at developing the story. I really enjoyed this movie. I'm giving it a 7 out of 10.

Raymond photo

If you're looking for a film with a great cast, a compelling story, and a strong message, then watch this film. If you're looking for a film with some pretty decent action, you'll probably find it in a horror genre film. The film is based on a true story and is set in the early 1900's. The movie starts out with a young boy named Will who runs away from home to become a bounty hunter. His first job is to capture a dangerous Indian named Pachacuti. Will becomes close to the boy, but soon gets his gun taken away by the Indian. Now the boy must return to his old family. He has to protect his family and the life he has made. In the end, the boy and his family get reunited, but Will has to fight for his family's honor and respect. The film is certainly a well-made film, but it's not the best. There are some great performances, and the film has a strong message. However, the film's narrative isn't very interesting, and the film's lack of a great villain is a disappointment. The film does have some great scenes, and there are some good performances. However, the film isn't a masterpiece and there are some great scenes in the film. The film is a good watch, but it's not a great film. I give the film a B-.

Emily photo

I was expecting something really, really good, but was actually pleasantly surprised. There are no big surprises, just enough to keep you watching. I think the most impressive thing about this movie is that it is neither too slow nor too fast. The pacing is just right. The movie is well shot, well edited and all the actors give great performances. There is not a single moment where you want to switch off the film. It is well acted and it is well shot. It is not the best film I have seen, but it is a very good film. It is about a family of outlaws living in the mountains of West Texas. The patriarch has a ranch and a family of 10 children. Their main concern is hunting and ranching. The family has three brothers and a sister and all the children are good shots. One of the brothers is a good shot, the other is a bad shot and the third is an average shot. There is a girl, who is a good shot and her brother is a good shot. The patriarch is the big boss and he likes to make sure all the children get a good shot. The children are so very nice, they do everything for him and are extremely loyal. One of the brothers and his wife have an affair and they are having trouble getting money from the ranch. The patriarch wants to leave the family and move to the city. There are many things in the movie that are not shown. It is just enough to keep you interested. I was also impressed by the acting. The actors in the film all did a great job. I could really feel their pain and I could really feel the tension in the movie. The father and the youngest son are so great. The eldest son is just average. The wife is really not given much to do. The father is very good at his job, but he is really a nice guy. The youngest daughter is not given much to do. The father and the eldest son are just good shots, but the youngest daughter is a very good shot. There is no one bad shot in the film. The characters are real. The actors are real. The story is real. The story is not predictable. There is no one moment in the movie that is predictable. I will give the movie a 7 out of 10. It is an interesting movie, with a lot of action and a lot of drama. It is a very good movie.

Mark photo

It's been a long time since I've watched a western in theaters. I mean I've seen them all, but this one just had to be my favorite. I know that I have a hard time making the leap to watch them on the big screen, but this movie was great. The story is not just about the history of the western, but also about the history of the family. It has a strong cast of character actors, who I think did a great job with their roles. I think this is a movie that you should watch. I'm not saying you have to love westerns, but you have to enjoy the history of the western genre. I think this movie is very underrated, and I would recommend it to anyone who loves a good western.

Jonathan photo

The most noticeable aspect of this film is the editing. The first half is very slow, and in the second half it becomes even slower. This makes it even more confusing. The first half of the film is about the relationship between the men in the Texas frontier town, where all the men have to be in uniform. The story centers around the town, but it never tells you anything about the men. What you learn from this film is that the men are good men who just want to be left alone. The story also goes on to tell us about the men's love for each other, and how they can't stand to see their wives and daughters get hurt. This film is very slow, and I don't understand why they bothered to cut out the second half. The story of the film is not as interesting as the first half, and I don't think the second half is as good as the first. I found the film boring.

Madison photo

When I first saw this movie I was too young to fully understand the story and I didn't understand the ending. So I did not understand the ending until I saw the film again. Now that I understand the story and I understand the ending, I can see the movie more clearly. I found the movie interesting, and I can understand why it is rated so low. But I do not understand why it is rated so low. The acting is good and the cinematography is good, but the story is very weak. If I have a better understanding of the story and of the ending, I would like this movie more. I rate it 7/10.

Joe G. photo
Joe G.

It's been awhile since I've seen a good western in a theater, but this is one of those rare films that actually works. The story is so well told, it's almost a masterpiece. The performances are so powerful that it's almost painful to watch. In the end, it's the story that matters. I'm sure this film will make it to the top 250 list. It's that good. This is a great film, but not a great film. It's a great story, and it's a great movie.

Willie H. photo
Willie H.

I was very happy that I had waited until the last minute to see this film, and it is definitely worth the wait. It is a fascinating and original story. The performances by all the actors are very good, especially the lead female. I would recommend this film to anyone who likes westerns and movies with a strong female lead.

Joseph Brewer photo
Joseph Brewer

I watched this movie last night and I thought it was really good. I had a hard time trying to decide if I liked it or not, because I thought it was really good. I think the reason I like it is because it is more of a drama than a western. It is about a family and the way they live their lives. There is a lot of emotion that goes on in the movie, because you can't help but feel for the characters. This movie is definitely worth seeing, because it is a great drama. It is a good movie for the whole family to watch, and I think it will become a classic in the future. I give this movie a 7/10.

Jacob Freeman photo
Jacob Freeman

There is a big difference between the old and new versions of The Great Depression. The old version is a history lesson, and the new version is a look at life during that time. While the old version is a well-rounded history lesson, the new version is a look at life during that time. This version is good, but the new version is better. The new version shows a more realistic look at the Depression. The old version shows a more accurate look at the Depression. While the old version shows the Depression from the point of view of the wealthy, the new version shows the Depression from the point of view of the poor, and the rich were much more involved in the Depression. The old version is better than the new version. I give this movie a B+. The old version is better than this one. It is better than the new version.

Joseph Campbell photo
Joseph Campbell

Award-winning director Paul Thomas Anderson (Magnolia) turns the traditional Western genre on its head, with the most dynamic performance of the year by a young actor named Jake Gyllenhaal (The Master). He has an immediate magnetic chemistry with the talented and talented Kate Winslet, but I was surprised that the two of them worked so well together. They both have unique and believable characters. Anderson has a new way to show the brutality of the human condition and the brutality of the American way of life. He uses the dramatic conflict of the characters to tell his story. The story is not linear. It's not about one man's redemption. It's about how much more is there to a man's life than his quest for redemption. The story has a lot of questions that are not answered, but they are still questions that need to be asked. The film is not perfect, but I think that it is a great film. It is not perfect, but it is an excellent film.

Jose photo

I went into this movie with some of the same expectations that I have had for the Bourne films. I was a fan of the Bourne Identity, and enjoyed the action in that film, but I never thought it was all that great. I also have always been a fan of John Wick. So I was looking forward to seeing this movie, and I was very pleasantly surprised. I think it's one of those movies where you don't really know what you're going to get, and when it comes out, you're going to be pleasantly surprised. The movie isn't perfect, and some of the characters are just not as interesting as in the Bourne films. But the action is so intense, it's hard to tell who is the good guy and who is the bad guy. The story is really interesting, and the film is very well made. The acting is good, and I thought the movie was very well done. I thought the characters were well developed and you really care about what happens to them. I think the film could have been a little longer. There were parts in the film that I felt were too long. I was really looking forward to seeing this movie, but it wasn't as good as I hoped. I don't think the film was as good as the Bourne films, but it was very good. It's a little slow at times, but it's a good film. It's worth seeing, and I think you should see it. 7/10