Watch Cosmos

Cosmos

Cosmos is a movie starring Sabine Azéma, Jean-François Balmer, and Jonathan Genet. A young man, hoping to write a novel, visits a French guest-house with a friend, he but finds himself distracted by a strange mystery and the...

Other Titles
Kosmosas, Kosmos
Running Time
1 hours 43 minutes
Quality
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres
Drama
Director
Andrzej Zulawski
Writer
Witold Gombrowicz, Andrzej Zulawski
Actors
Jean-François Balmer, Johan Libéreau, Sabine Azéma, Jonathan Genet
Country
Portugal, France
Year
2015
Audio Languages
English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Subtitles
日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

Witold just failed his law-school examinations and Fuchs has just quit his job at a Parisian fashion company. Arriving for a few days away at a so-called family guest-house, they are greeted by a series of unsettling omens: a sparrow hanging in the forest, then a piece of wood in the same condition, and finally signs on the ceiling and in the garden. In this guest-house there is also a baleful mouth, that of the maid, and a perfect mouth, that of the young woman of the house with whom Witold falls madly in love. Unfortunately, she has just married an architect of the most respectable sort. But is the young woman equally respectable? The third hanging, that of the cat, is Witold's doing. Why did he do it? And above all - will the fourth hanging be that of a human?

Comments about drama «Cosmos» (23)

Joyce photo
Joyce

I'm a big fan of Sagan, and this was my first time seeing his work. I really liked it, and I've seen it a couple of times since. It was a good movie, with a great story, but it's not for everyone. I think the main problem with the movie is that it was not very well thought out, and it wasn't very clever. It was a little too simplistic. But it was still good, and it was worth watching. My biggest problem with the movie is that it's a little too simplistic. It's not very good, but it's not that bad. It's not the best movie I've seen, but it's a good movie.

Lisa Burton photo
Lisa Burton

The story of a woman in a convent who meets a young boy in the community. The story is told in flashbacks, and the actors do a great job in capturing this style of storytelling. In my opinion, it is the best performance by all the actors. I love the way they use the word "I". It makes me want to go on and read the book. The story is not only about the boy, but the woman who is in love with him. The boy is not just a child, he is an old man, and the woman is in love with him, and that is what they have always been. They have had this love for so long, that it is hard for them to admit it. The main idea of this movie is not a new one, but I really loved it. I have never been to a convent, but the story is a great story, and I think this movie has the potential to become a classic. My only problem is that the boy's face is so expressive, it makes me want to cry. I hope they do not ruin it. I am not sure, but I think this movie will be the next cult movie, like American Beauty.

Hannah J. photo
Hannah J.

I'm not sure what people think they are talking about here, but I found this film to be very good. I think that this film was made as a satire, and I think that it was very well done. I also found it very interesting to see a film that was based on a true story and not just based on a popular book, because I think that a lot of films are based on popular books, but I'm glad that this film is not. The acting was very good, especially from the cast members. I think that they did a very good job. The music was also very good. I really enjoyed the music and the different types of music that were played in this film. Overall, I would recommend this film to anyone who enjoys a good satire. 7/10

Thomas O. photo
Thomas O.

My commentaries have been more than varied, but I can't think of any movies that have ever had the potential to change the way I see movies. "The Omega Man" is definitely one of them. In fact, I would say this movie is probably one of the best of the Sci-Fi/Horror genre. It has an excellent cast (except for the female lead) and I would highly recommend it to anyone who enjoys the genre. It's not an easy movie to watch, but I definitely felt the movie was worth it. The best part of the movie is the ending. The story moves in a very organic way, and there are no pointless scenes. Overall, "The Omega Man" is a very solid movie, and one I would definitely recommend to anyone who likes the genre.

Sean Elliott photo
Sean Elliott

I know that the majority of people who have rated this film have done so for one of two reasons: (1) they were fans of the book, and therefore were expecting the movie to be identical to the book, or (2) they were expecting a movie of the same quality as the book. I'm not going to waste your time on this one. I do agree with the first comment, however, the movie has a few things going for it. First, the cinematography was excellent. The movie was shot very well, and the scenes where they moved from one location to another were incredibly well lit. The acting was also great, with the actors all playing their characters well. The one actor who really stood out for me was John Malkovich. He played the character of Tom a lot better than I expected, and really made me feel that this was really his character. Overall, I really enjoyed this movie. I think the best parts of the movie were the first and second act, where the plot was completely different, and the main character seemed like he was more of a human than an alien. I think the movie is great for people who are fans of the book, because it really shows how they would have reacted if they were alive and reading the book. It's really cool to see how the movie will be different from the book. The second act was also really good. Overall, this movie was great. I'm giving it a 7 out of 10, because it was a little slow in the middle, but I really enjoyed it. I think that it's a good movie to watch if you're a sci-fi fan, and if you're a fan of John Malkovich, you will enjoy it.

Jesse W. photo
Jesse W.

It's not really a movie. It's a series of conversations. It's the longest and most meaningless movie I've ever seen. The first ten minutes or so is just like an ad for a product, and in the last 10 minutes or so it all starts to make sense. The story is about a guy (I think) who meets an alien and the story is basically a message he sends to the aliens. The aliens don't read it, so they don't know what to do with it. He gets an invitation to a party, and they invite him to stay at their home. But he doesn't know how to get there. He doesn't know how to get to the place where he wants to go. He doesn't know where to go. He just walks in and there's a girl sitting there. He starts to talk to her, and she starts to talk to him. They talk and talk and talk. He goes back and forth between them and his friends. He's the man of the house. The aliens are very nice, but they're the kind of people who have no use for human beings. It's a very odd movie, and you might not like it. It's not as good as "2001: A Space Odyssey", but it's not bad. It's a movie with no real point, and I don't know why they made it. Maybe it's just that the people who made it just wanted to make a movie about an alien, and they couldn't think of anything else. I don't think it was made for any reason other than to make a movie about an alien.

Gerald photo
Gerald

The overall tone of this film is depressing. It's a bit of a downer in my opinion. It is a bit of a downer, but I also found it rather interesting. I was thinking about the science fiction that the film was going to be about. I am a little disappointed that the science fiction that the film was going to be about didn't come out until about 30 minutes into the film. I also found it kind of disturbing that the scientist in the film was so off-the-wall crazy. I found it disturbing because he seemed to be the only person who would have that crazy idea. I am also not a big fan of the director. I don't like him, I found him to be boring and not very funny. I found that this film was more like an action film. I don't think that it was very well made and I didn't find the acting to be very good. Overall, I liked this film, but I wasn't that impressed. I was expecting more from the director.

George photo
George

This film is not about a single man, but a collection of people, from different backgrounds and faiths. There are many things that could have been done to make this film more believable. The way the director decided to tell this story is what made it interesting. Although the beginning of the film is cliche, the way the story unfolds is what makes this film great. If you like films that involve a lot of emotion and real people, you'll probably like this film.

Alan photo
Alan

I liked this movie and would have rated it higher if it had been better. It does have its moments. I would recommend this movie to anyone who enjoys films of this type. It has some very nice scenes and is just the right length. I found it hard to believe that so many people would watch this film for the sole purpose of seeing M. Night Shyamalan, but I suppose that's part of the appeal. It's a little slow in places, but I was mostly satisfied with the film. It was a good movie.

Louis photo
Louis

It's a pity that a film like this one, which is designed to entertain and enlighten people about the nature of the universe, has been so misused by the corporate media to promote their own agenda. The mainstream media are very keen to promote their own ideas and agenda, which are aimed at keeping people in a state of ignorance. They are not interested in informing people about the truth, or providing them with the tools to reach their own conclusions. They are interested in keeping people confused, and so they promote these ideas and ideas as fact. I can't help feeling that this film was an attempt to convince people that the entire universe was made up of huge computers and all of the planets in the solar system. It's not. This film is about how we view the world and what we want to see. This film is not intended to convince you that the universe is not perfect, or that there is no God, but to show us that the way we view the world is far from the truth. I loved this film. I feel that it will remain a classic for many years to come. I will watch it again, and again, and again.

Matthew Stone photo
Matthew Stone

I was really looking forward to watching this movie, but it was not what I expected. I did not read the book, and I'm a big fan of Neil Gaiman. I'm sure I would have enjoyed the movie more, but I can't see why people were so critical of it. I did like the movie, but I was disappointed in some of the scenes. I also thought that some of the special effects were a bit cheesy. I thought that the movie was a little more intense than it was supposed to be, and I think that's what caused some of the negative reviews. I also thought that some of the characters were a little underdeveloped, and I thought that they were a little stereotypical. I also thought that the movie didn't focus on any of the characters enough. I think that the movie was better than what I expected, but I think it is worth seeing. The special effects were good, and I think that the movie was worth watching.

Crystal R. photo
Crystal R.

I don't know why this movie gets such a bad rating. This is a brilliant film, and I recommend it to everyone. The story is very simple and is told in an easy way. The only thing I didn't like was the idea of sending a virus to earth. However, this isn't a problem for me. The movie is so beautiful and poetic. It is so full of meanings, that I don't even have to tell you what they are. It is also very funny, and very touching, even if it is only a little bit. The characters are so beautiful and I love them. I have to say that the best part of the movie is when they are flying through space. They have to go through a space station. The best part is when the characters are on the space station. It is really great. I hope you will enjoy this film as much as I have.

Janet photo
Janet

This movie, although a bit long, is a good adaptation of the book. The characters, especially the one who is "out of place", are well portrayed. The main problem with this film is that there is so much going on, that it is hard to keep up with it all. I was getting dizzy from the moving camera. That being said, it is a good movie and I would recommend it to anyone who loves a movie with an intelligent plot. I give it a 7 out of 10.

Tiffany photo
Tiffany

If you're looking for an engaging film about an epic struggle for survival, then you should be happy to find that you won't be disappointed. The premise is that there is an alien race which is supposedly destroying the Earth, but there are actually a number of people who are using that to build a new world. You have to go back to the original series, where they went on to talk about how the world they were building was still good, despite it being destroyed. I think the people who are complaining about how much this film has changed are missing the point. They should be praising this film for giving them a chance to talk about the merits of a world being destroyed. It's a good film to watch if you're looking for something that has a lot of depth and complexity, but if you're looking for an action-packed, cheesy film, then this is the film for you. But if you're looking for something that's fun, that doesn't have a lot of depth or complexity, then you shouldn't go into this film expecting to be entertained.

Ethan Mendoza photo
Ethan Mendoza

This movie was good. I liked it, it had a very good story. The director and the writer did a great job of putting this story together. The actors were very good, and did a very good job with their roles. The camera work and lighting were great. The music was great. It was just a great movie, I give it 7 out of 10 stars. I give this movie a B.

Tyler B. photo
Tyler B.

I have to say I am not an academic, nor have I studied the Bible, but I was very impressed with this film. I felt that it was very much like the original movie, but I think it was much more of a documentary. I would not call it a film that I would watch twice, but if you like it, then it is worth watching. The acting was great, the story was great, and I think it was very well done. I think that the directing and editing was great. I think it is a film that people can watch and understand and I think it is a very good movie. I give it a 7 out of 10, because it is a good film, and I think people who like the original movie should watch it. If you like the movie, then I would recommend it to you. I think that this movie is good.

Jeremy H. photo
Jeremy H.

In the last few years, there has been a lot of "look at me" self-indulgence in Hollywood. From the last movie about a tragic loss, to "The Aviator" and "the dark knight," there's been a lot of telling the audience to take a "look at me" and to "feel" what they're feeling. This is a movie about the struggle to find and understand your place in the world. The movie is about the film that started the whole "look at me" movement. It was made in 1973, and still remains to this day one of the best movies about the human condition. The story follows a young man named "Bill," played by Michael Caine. Bill is a pretty quiet kid, and his mother left him when he was very young. He is raised by his father, a farmer, who is mostly in the background. Bill is sent to live with his uncle, a doctor, and his sister, a priest, who seems to be quite religious. Bill has a good friend in the form of an older boy named Johnny, played by Bill Paxton, who is kind of a nerd. Johnny has a crush on Bill, but he has no interest in pursuing him. Johnny is also a pretty good musician, but doesn't really want to pursue his interest. His father is concerned that he may be "dead" by then, and he wants to teach him to be happy. Bill is in his second year of college, and he finds out he has a scholarship offer from a small university in the South, so he heads there to get his degree. However, his father tells him he needs to work his way through the school and make some connections, and that he will not be able to go to college. Bill tries to do this, but he is more concerned about making a decent living than he is about the academics. He ends up getting a job at a grocery store, and he is soon to have a girlfriend, named Sue, played by Annabella Sciorra. Sue's father, who is also a doctor, has found a cure for a disease, and he gives Bill the job of preparing the drugs. Bill doesn't like the job, but he does like it, because he's only paying a few bucks an hour, and he has a friend in the store, so he is making some money. He is also making a friend with the store manager, and the two of them decide to go to see a movie together, and get a job at the theater. Sue is very depressed, but she and her father want to help Bill, so they give him the job of getting tickets for the movie, and they are planning to go together. However, when Bill and Sue get there, they discover that they have tickets for the movie, and it is a musical, and they decide to go. Bill is deeply moved by the experience, and he ends up with a crush on Sue, who is also a musician. When they get there, the theater is packed, and the audience is in love with the movie, and they give the movie an enthusiastic rating. The director of the theater, who is a member of the local church, and who is trying to convert people to Christianity, also is impressed by the movie,

Ann F. photo
Ann F.

What was it about the book that made it so much more difficult for me to see? Was it the (probably excessive) length? Was it the change of viewpoint from the hero to the villain? The complete absence of a character who actually gives a damn about the outcome of the story? The ending? I'm not sure. What I do know is that I'm glad that I read the book, because it's the only one I know. Now, that being said, I found the movie to be a lot more effective than I would have expected. It is, of course, a great movie. The acting is all around great. The characters are very well-drawn, and the acting is just as good. It's not quite as good as the book, but it's still very good. The plot is more complex, and I have to say, the ending was a little more surprising. It's not a perfect movie, but it's a great movie. It's a shame that it doesn't get the recognition it deserves. As a story, it's very difficult to pull off, and it would have been better if they had. It's worth seeing, but don't expect it to be the same book that you read. There are a few things that I think could have been better, like the ending. I'm sure that most people have seen the movie, but if you haven't, you should probably check it out. It's good, but not great. 7/10

Heather photo
Heather

If I were to summarize the plot of this film in one word, it would be "irrational". The whole movie is a series of bizarre events that are done in a way that makes you wonder about what is real and what is not. It's a very hard film to describe because it is a combination of many different styles and sub-genres. If you can just get past the rather poor and unrealistic acting and the completely weird and unnecessary CGI, you'll be a better spectator of the film. I know that I would have enjoyed the film a lot more if it had been better edited. If you liked "Dances with Wolves", "The Matrix", or any other Matrix-type movie, you should definitely give this one a try.

Megan photo
Megan

Cosmos is a great story, beautifully photographed, well acted and directed. The film is not a perfect work of art, but it is a masterpiece of artistic integrity. It is a work of art that has been directed with such precision, that one might mistake it for an art film. The story revolves around the very simple and yet incredibly complex idea that life and death are both inescapable, and that there is no reason for either one to happen. It is an idea that is so simplistic, that it may not be completely understood by some people. I am very familiar with this idea, and the idea that I was trying to convey in the film was so simple, and yet so powerful. I think the reason that I felt so strongly about this film, is because I felt so connected to it. I felt that I was able to connect to the film and to the characters, that I was able to understand them and feel what they were feeling. The film was very personal to me. I can not stress the importance of this film enough. I am now reading about it on the internet, and reading about the historical context of the film, and it is still very powerful to me. I would love to see a film that is directed and shot with this same level of attention to detail. I would love to see a film that is written and shot with this same level of detail, and this film does not disappoint.

Carolyn Bennett photo
Carolyn Bennett

A film with a good cast. I was impressed with the acting. I was also surprised at the originality of the story. It was interesting to see an example of how new ideas could be transformed. The animation was a little slow at times, but it was okay. It was a good movie for a rainy afternoon.

Jonathan photo
Jonathan

This movie is so disappointing. It's just too confusing. There are so many plot holes and so many scenes that could have been so much more. You don't know who is doing what to whom and what is happening. I kept waiting for the ending, but it never came. The movie is also too long. It would have been much better if they had cut the whole movie down to about 75 minutes. I didn't feel like I was missing out on anything, but I felt like I had to watch every little detail of the movie again to catch everything. Overall, this movie is not worth your time. I think it would have been much better if it had been about 3 hours long instead of about 2. The acting is terrible, the direction is terrible, the plot is horrible, the sound is terrible. The acting is bad, the direction is bad, the plot is horrible, the sound is terrible. The movie is terrible. This movie is terrible.

Shirley photo
Shirley

The essence of this film is that it is a tale of two very different characters. The director has made an interesting film, it is a little over long, and the actors don't seem to have an easy time with the material. I found this movie rather difficult to watch. The thing that I find most disturbing is the way this movie portrays the portrayal of religion as something that is not real. I do not find it realistic to believe that a religion can be based on religion. I find it more interesting that this movie takes a completely different turn from most religion based movies. I found it to be quite well done, and it is a good example of how to create a good movie.