Watch Il traditore

Il traditore

Il traditore is a movie starring Pierfrancesco Favino, Luigi Lo Cascio, and Fausto Russo Alesi. The real life of Tommaso Buscetta, the so-called "boss of the two worlds," the first mafia informant in Sicily in the 1980s.

Other Titles
黑金叛徒, Le traître, Hain, El traidor, The Traitor, Az első áruló, O Traidor, Ο Προδότης, Zdrajca, Il Traditore: Als Kronzeuge gegen die Cosa Nostra, Izdajnik, Der Verräter
Running Time
2 hours 25 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Drama, Crime, Biography
Marco Bellocchio
Ludovica Rampoldi, Francesco Piccolo, Valia Santella, Marco Bellocchio, Francesco La Licata
Maria Fernanda Cândido, Luigi Lo Cascio, Fausto Russo Alesi, Pierfrancesco Favino
France, Germany, Brazil, Italy
Audio Languages
English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

The real life of Tommaso Buscetta, the so-called "boss of the two worlds," the first mafia informant in Sicily in the 1980s.

Comments about drama «Il traditore» (21)

Douglas photo

This movie is in no way a biopic, it is a movie about people. The movie is based on a true story of four brothers who were arrested by police in the late 80's for stealing $20,000 in cash. When they were released, they were accused of a series of robberies and murder. They spent 10 years in prison, with another 5 years in jail. One brother, John Lennon, was released in 1994, but the other two brothers remained behind bars. For years, they kept on talking about what they did, how they were being mistreated, and they were getting to know each other. After they were released, they were still hated by the other prisoners, and by the other inmates. One day, the two brothers decided to write letters to the man who put them in jail, and to give them their freedom back. They wrote a letter to the man who gave them their freedom back. That man was the man who was in charge of their prison, and also had the power to release them. The two brothers wrote the letter to him, and the man's name was Michael Murphy. He was a friend of the brothers. The letter to him was signed, "We want back our freedom." The two brothers went to the prison where they were being held. They were completely disgusted with their prison conditions, and they decided to write letters to their "boss". That was John Lennon, and he was very friendly with the two brothers. He told them he had written a letter to the Warden, and the Warden's name was Michael Murphy. He told them they could go back to the prison, and the two brothers did that. They were released back into the hands of their original prison guards. They went to a restaurant, and they told the waiter they had been released. They were going to return to the prison where they were being held, but they forgot to tell the waiter they were going to return to the prison. The waiter then told them he would take them home. That was the end of that story, and this movie is a movie about the events of that day. It shows the events leading up to that day, and it shows how the two brothers went to get their freedom back. That's why I gave this movie a 7 out of 10. This is not a biopic. It is a movie about people.

Donald H. photo
Donald H.

This is not a movie that's well-liked by most people, and that's unfortunate. The film is quite brutal in the ways it portrays the "cannibalism" of the children. There are a few scenes that are both humorous and tragic, and the film can be compared to the film "Slaughter" in that it takes a lot of the horror of it and uses it to show the harsh reality of what it's like to be a young child in the same situation. But despite this being a hard-hitting film, it's not a film for everyone. I'm not sure if it's an American or British film, but if it is, I'd say the scenes are less graphic than those in "Slaughter". And this is important to me. Some people might think this is just another anti-violence film. I'm not sure if the violence is graphic enough to scare the hell out of you, or if it's the violence that's frightening. I'm not sure if you should like the film or not. It's not one of those films that makes you feel good, but rather make you feel a little bad. It's not a film that I would recommend, but if you want to watch it, I'd say it's worth it.

Sandra O. photo
Sandra O.

This is a pretty good crime/detective film. It is not a particularly good film but it is entertaining. It does not really make any point about anything but it is a very well done film. The performances are all very good and the cast are all very good in their own right. I would definitely recommend this film to anyone who likes crime/detective/drama/crime drama films. The film is certainly not the most exciting film you will ever see but it is definitely entertaining.

Dylan W. photo
Dylan W.

I'm not a big fan of Italian crime movies, so it was really nice to see a new one that actually involved Italian actors and that didn't have the French or the English as a background. It was very difficult to make the movie in Italian without making it a disaster, so the translation was very tricky. There was some way that this movie could have been better, but it was good enough to get the point across. It was a very interesting movie, with some very beautiful images of Sicily and Rome. The story was the story, but there was enough background for it to be interesting.

Adam photo

The current trend in film has been towards "reality" or "truth". But in Italy, reality is not really available in films. The most popular Italian film is a comedy about the "justice" of the Italian justice system. The system that has received so much criticism is described in a movie about the best Italian justice system ever. The justice system in Italy is used for many crimes that are only possible because of its recent changes. In the movie, the justice system, with a ridiculous name, is used for the one crime that was committed by a female teacher. The justice system tries to find the guilty party and when it cannot, it tries to use the system in a very complicated way to solve the problem. This movie, in which the justice system is shown as the worst system in the world, and the good acting and the plot made it even more entertaining.

David photo

I saw this movie in a very good theater, and I'm pretty sure it was the best movie of the year. This is the story of a group of two white and two black brothers in the Bronx, one of them a former hood and one a middle-class kid. When they meet at a summer camp, the older brother, Nick, a real gangster, forces the younger brother, Deven, to go with him to his brother's house. At first, Nick is reluctant, but he does eventually go along. But then things take a turn for the worse. He and Deven start stealing cars, stealing money from their brother's boss. Nick is later involved in a shooting that ends up killing the boss, who is also the head of the neighborhood. This causes the brother's father to lose control of the neighborhood. The movie is great, but it is not as good as I had expected it to be. The film is based on a true story, and that's what made it so great. The acting is excellent. I was surprised that the older brother, Steve, played the role of the older brother very well. He is probably one of the best actors I've ever seen. He was perfect in this role. This movie is good, but not great. I'm giving it a 7/10.

Cynthia N. photo
Cynthia N.

All of the major players in this story are complex and layered, so it's impossible to say who was at fault in what manner. There were many layers in this story, and it's quite a bit like a living room drama. It's the story of a real family, but you know it's going to end one way or another, and you're in a world of it's own. It's a bit like watching a movie with a particular scene at the end that is all the actors in that scene are waiting for. I'd say, it's a story of a real family that will be loved by many people, but I could have done without all the dreamy piano music that some of the characters play. So that's a 6. I don't understand why the Oscar was awarded to this movie.

William B. photo
William B.

It's a wonderful movie that explores the struggles of an ordinary man, whose life is thrown into disarray by the sudden and tragic death of his wife. This movie's message is that when you have an ordinary life, no matter how much you try to make your life a success, you will always be fighting with yourself, even when it seems to be completely hopeless. There is an important message in this movie, which is that when you are in a constant state of turmoil and confusion, the world does not necessarily help you. I believe that this is the true meaning of life. The real meaning of life is to make things happen for yourself. This movie was made by one of the best directors in the world, Tom Hooper, who has made many great movies. I hope that people see this movie and will be able to understand what it's about. This movie shows you that, when you have a lot of problems in your life, that nothing will ever change that much. So, you need to be careful of what you say, because you can get more in trouble than you imagine. It's a great movie, and I recommend it to everyone. I rate it a 7/10.

Danielle H. photo
Danielle H.

I don't know if there are really any details about this film that I would really like to know. But it is a pretty good film, and I am sure that there are quite a few people that would like to have seen this film. And if they could tell me what the story is about, I would be happy to read it. My advice would be to watch this film. Because it is a pretty good film. I don't know if there is a more important film. The more important film is the one that you have seen before. But if you do not know what to watch first, then watch this film. Because it is pretty good.

Sandra Weaver photo
Sandra Weaver

A family of three unashamedly modern and highly ambitious Italian thieves who, unlike the Mafia families, are not held up by guilt but by the fact that they are extremely smart, can be very ruthless and can go to any length to make their money. Their manager is a conniving, ambitious man who wants to take advantage of the family business but who is afraid of the consequences of doing so. The story revolves around the two brothers, one the best-known and the other the most dangerous, both of whom are caught up in an attempt to destroy the family business. There are numerous other sub-plots involving the family, and this may be one of the main reasons why this movie is so strong. The acting is great, especially from the two leading men and the two wives. As the story develops, the two brothers are shown to be willing to take out anyone who threatens their empire. There is a great deal of conflict between the two brothers, and when they come to blows, you can really see how much they care for each other. The movie itself is worth seeing, even if you are not interested in Italian mob movies.

Edward photo

A bold piece of work. After the sad passing of her sister, a young mother (Gina Gershon) and her young son decide to go to their hometown in Germany, for the weekend, to try to save their parents' lives. It is very difficult, and stressful, to watch the very difficult process of an extremely young mother trying to hold back tears while she goes through her life with her husband (Tim Roth), and her son. As the film unfolds, it becomes clear that Gershon and Roth are very good actors. They seem so believable in their roles. As they walk along the streets of their hometown, we see their emotion, which becomes very apparent as the events of the weekend progress. We get the feeling that they are living their lives as best they can, and that they are doing their best to support their parents and grandparents. The only thing I did not like about the film was the ending. The movie just seemed to be a little overlong, and it seemed to drag on for a little too long. I was glad that I watched the film, and I am glad that I did not walk out on it. I do not think that it is a good film, but it is a very good film.

Alexander Jensen photo
Alexander Jensen

This is a tale about a family of hoodlums. It starts with a suicide attempt by one of the gang, then moves into the lives of the gang members, and ends with the gang members' families dealing with their loss. The story is a good one, and the direction is solid, but it feels like the director just threw everything into this movie, and then threw out the kitchen sink. There's no real build up to the gang's feud, or the gang's life. It's just an unspoken tension between them, that slowly builds until they eventually settle on a war. They really should've explained their feelings, and how they feel. The film is a decent story, but the film feels very rushed, and the film lacks any sort of context. The director should've explained their feelings and feelings of their families and how they felt, and also how the gangs act, and the film could've been better.

Peter H. photo
Peter H.

Criminally ill Russian fisherman Alexei walks the line between life and death for months. With no family and an extremely short lifespan, he lives off the net. In a state of constant flux, he lives with his girlfriend and is eventually persuaded to sell his net to a local fishing camp. Alexei is not the only one looking for work, and when the fisherman finds a new job, the crew are understandably anxious to get started. As the weeks go by, Alexei's body becomes increasingly frail and it is hoped that he will die. However, the crew is not prepared for the end of their leader, and when the end comes, the way is open for Alexei to turn his life around. While the story of Alexei is complex, it is told in a manner which shows the value of human life. The fact that Alexei's life has been in constant flux is not something which is shown, and we see that he is in constant danger. The film takes a deep look into the heart of the Russian fisherman and the beauty of the Russian people. The scenes of Alexei on the net are unforgettable, as is the scene of Alexei's close encounter with his wife. It is a film which can be enjoyed by all ages, but which will resonate with those of us who are also fish and crab fishermen. It is worth watching for its honesty, but there are also many scenes which may cause you to be upset, as it is not always the case.

John Chapman photo
John Chapman

While the first half of the movie was funny, the second half just didn't cut it. The ending was not very strong, and you could tell that it was coming. And, unfortunately, it came. I kept expecting it to be funny, but it was just not. I just wanted to see what happens next, and what really happens to these people, and I think that was what I expected, but the movie didn't deliver. But, in the end, I think that the movie was good, and worth watching. If you like funny movies, watch it.

Ralph Morales photo
Ralph Morales

In his last film, director Pina Bausch gives us a disturbing portrait of the sexual abuse and exploitation of young children in the 1960s. "The Third Man" is a remarkable film. The film has a plot that is intriguing, and the production values are very good. It is not a great film, but is worth seeing. The film's purpose is to show us the terrible abuse of children that was going on in the late 60s and early 70s. It is not the story of a priest who sexually abuses children, but rather of the adults who were sexually abusing them. The film is structured around the child sex ring. In one scene, an older man shows a young boy a picture of the boy's mother and then tells him that his mother is going to be a whore. It is interesting to see the actor playing the older man. He looks like a demented man, and this was the part he was cast for. The film does not cover the sex ring, but rather the story of how one priest is caught. The film is a powerful depiction of what happened in the mid 60s. It is not a story about the good guy or the bad guy, but rather a story about the abuse of children. The film is very well made. It is slow moving, but the direction is good. The acting is very good. In addition, it is one of the best films of the 1970s. There are very disturbing scenes, and there is no question that the film is shocking. I was not sure how to feel about the film until I saw it, but I am glad that I saw it. The only complaint I have is that it was not nearly as good as the previous film, "Nostalghia." It is a film that should not be missed.

Lauren Richards photo
Lauren Richards

This movie is like a work of art. The way the movie was put together is very interesting. I do not know why a movie is made like this, but that is what makes it a masterpiece. It is definitely not a "feel good movie", which is not the intention of the writer and director. In fact, it is a very serious, and realistic movie, because the main character, Mario, is not a criminal, but a victim of a brutal crime. I think that is the main purpose of this movie. It is a real character study, showing how a very talented person like Mario got killed by this terrible crime. The movie is a masterpiece. It shows how a human being can be totally affected by a violent crime. It shows how a person can be so much like a monster. If the viewer likes the subject matter, he will enjoy the movie, but I think the movie would not be as good as it is. The story is very interesting and well told. It is like the real life of a person. But, as I said, the movie is not a feel good movie, so I do not recommend it. But if you like a movie with a very serious subject matter, you will love this movie. It is a great movie and worth watching. I rate this movie 7/10.

Aaron photo

The title refers to the fact that the main character was, until he started working with a killer, an accomplished writer. He had an excellent reputation as a writer, but by the end of the movie he is no longer that. He no longer has anything left to say, he's lost his talent, he has no ideas, he has lost his credibility, he is no longer a writer, and that is the way he feels. There are many things to be said about this movie. It's very well acted, has a great script, and a good director. The problems are mainly due to the fact that the director is making the story as real as possible, which makes it hard to follow. You know that the director is making the story for a certain purpose, and that is the movie's strength. It's not the director's fault, but his. He should have directed this movie the way he would have done it in the real world, and maybe not have even read the book. At least he would have known what to do, and he would have made it a bit better. The movie is also about the idea of writing, but at the end it is not about writing at all. In the end it is about the director's ego, his need to tell the story in a way that the director can't understand. I would not recommend this movie for people who are easily disturbed. It is not necessary to have been affected by a traumatic event in your life to understand that it is a very good movie, but it is very hard to understand it.

Tyler H. photo
Tyler H.

Being a film student, I had some expectations when I watched this film. But they were really not so great. But I also have a great feeling about the actors, and the way the film was made. It was really beautiful. Even the way they did the fight scenes with the cats was beautiful. I also liked the way the relationship between all the characters was made. It was well thought of. I hope there will be a sequel with more serious subjects, like the same one with John Lennon and Yoko Ono. I think it would be a great thing to have it.

Samuel D. photo
Samuel D.

The title "The Untouchables" refers to the relationship between "the Untouchables" (actually three families) as the title of the movie, which is based on real events, and which became a fictionalized series, where the real-life protagonists were either just "untouchables" or were just "untouchables" in the original series. The movie begins in 1890, where we meet "The Untouchables", who were "the Untouchables" as the real-life "Untouchables" were all "untouchables". There are some big-name actors in this movie: Al Pacino, Harvey Keitel, James Gandolfini, John Malkovich, Michael Murphy, John Leguizamo, Billy Bob Thornton, and Kevin Costner, which makes it very interesting and exciting. The plot is quite simple, as the story revolves around a "bounty hunter" (Pacino), who becomes a "unofficial" "untouchable" to the people he hunts. This is an interesting idea, as it shows that some people are not "untouchables", and that the ones that are "untouchables" are just like the people they are hunting. But the real reason for the movie's title, is the fact that the real-life "Untouchables" were not "untouchables", and that's what this movie is based on. The two main actors were pretty good, especially the lead actor, who is really talented and very good. However, there is a little problem with this movie. The plot is not too exciting, and there are not too many surprises, especially because of the ending. But it is an interesting movie to watch, and it's really worth to see.

Bruce Peters photo
Bruce Peters

For most of the movie, it seems like this is going to be a very simple story, but it is anything but. I didn't know that the true story behind this film was based on a true story, and I think it's an interesting one. The movie is very well made, and it really makes you feel for the characters. I think the acting is very good, but I thought this is one of the better films of the year, but it isn't a very good film. It was very confusing, it was very long, and I think that's the problem with the film, but I would recommend it. Overall, I think this is a good movie, but it is very long and confusing, and it's not really that good. I would recommend it to people who are into films about drug dealing, and people who are into their family situations. 7/10

Frances Silva photo
Frances Silva

I enjoyed this movie very much. It is the story of the day when a woman called Kim Yong Nam, who was the boss of a very powerful crime syndicate in the Japanese-controlled Gangster Age, left the gangsters, and started her own company, which became a successful business. The movie shows how she was able to get herself to a position of power, and then to get revenge on those who wronged her, for the sake of the people she believed in. The way she dealt with her new boss was like a true pirate. The movie tells the story of the life of a very good person. The fact that she was betrayed by her own people, is something that really touches the heart. She is a great woman who has been used and betrayed by the Gangsters, who have been in power for a long time, but she stood up for the people she believed in. I loved the fact that the movie does not tell us how the woman got to power, but tells us how she got revenge on those who wronged her. The movie does not have a happy ending, but the end of the movie is a very powerful one. The movie shows us how a person can become a great leader, and how a woman can take revenge. I recommend this movie to everyone who likes movies with a very good story. I give it a 9 out of 10.