Watch Vita & Virginia

Vita & Virginia

Vita & Virginia is a movie starring Gemma Arterton, Elizabeth Debicki, and Isabella Rossellini. It's the fascinating true story about the love affair between socialite and popular author Vita Sackville-West and literary icon...

Other Titles
Ο Έρωτας της Βιρτζίνια Γουλφ, Vita és Virginia: Szerelmünk története, Vita And Virginia
Running Time
1 hours 50 minutes
Quality
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres
Drama, Romance, Biography
Director
Chanya Button
Writer
Vita Sackville-West, Eileen Atkins, Chanya Button, Virginia Woolf
Actors
Rupert Penry-Jones, Isabella Rossellini, Elizabeth Debicki, Gemma Arterton
Country
Ireland, UK
Year
2018
Audio Languages
English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Subtitles
日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

It's the fascinating true story about the love affair between socialite and popular author Vita Sackville-West and literary icon Virginia Woolf.

Comments about drama «Vita & Virginia» (18)

Howard photo
Howard

This film is a tribute to the beautiful memories of two very different women. The first one is Patricia Arquette who played "Virginia" in this film. The second one is the actress who played Patricia Arquette's mother. In the film, Patricia Arquette plays "Virginia" who is a young lady who lives with her mother in the small town of Marion, Indiana. Virginia is a beautiful and charming girl who is a beautiful and talented singer. Her father is a retired war veteran and is dying of cancer. One day, when Virginia goes to a concert in Indianapolis, she accidentally shoots and kills a man who was trying to rape her. Her father is convinced that her friend "Virginia" is the murderer. The police arrest "Virginia" and bring her to a psychiatric hospital where she is placed under the care of psychiatrist Dr. Sue Clark. Dr. Clark is a gentle and kind doctor who has a beautiful and caring attitude towards her patients. She knows that Virginia is a very fragile girl who will never be able to recover from the loss of her father. Dr. Clark treats Virginia with respect and tries to teach her the value of friendship. After some time, Dr. Clark is forced to admit Virginia into a hospital. While in the hospital, Virginia begins to realize that she is not the murderer. She begins to experience feelings of love for her father, the man she shot, and begins to learn the value of friendship. Patricia Arquette plays Virginia. Her performance is excellent and she has a good chemistry with Vincent D'Onofrio who plays her father. This is the first film in which Vincent D'Onofrio plays a doctor. In the film, Virginia has a profound effect on the doctors in the hospital. Dr. Clark has a strong relationship with Virginia and she tries to help her to recover from her feelings of guilt and she begins to realize that she is not the murderer. The movie is very touching and has a very good ending. This is a film that you should see. It is a good movie and I give it an A.

Vincent Hanson photo
Vincent Hanson

I recently watched the original Japanese version of the movie "Vita" which I think is better than the remake. The original is more "old school" than the remake. It's not like "The King of Kong" or "The Godfather" but it is still a pretty good movie. This one is more like a "road movie" style. It's not about the supernatural but more about the people that are in the movie. It's not too much about the supernatural but more about the human side. The story is interesting and keeps the audience interested. The movie has some of the best actors I've ever seen. The original version of the movie is pretty much the same as the remake but the remake is much better. I give this one a 7/10.

Judy photo
Judy

In this story, a young woman from the slums of Manila is being forced to marry an American. The film does a good job of showing the intense feelings of the main character, her parents, her friends, and her neighbors. The film is extremely well made, with a good pace and an excellent script. The film also has a very good cast, with a good performance from Mimi Rogers and a very good performance from Domhnall Gleeson. There is also a strong performance from David Oyelowo, as the role of the father. Overall, this is a good film about a strong story. It is not a great film, but it is good.

Jeremy Price photo
Jeremy Price

This is a very well made movie. The cinematography is breathtaking and the performances are great. The story is not bad, the acting is pretty good. But, the thing that I can't forgive, is the ending. There is a long scene where the two main characters are talking, and one of them says "the end". This scene should have ended right there. It is a shame that this scene was not included. If they had done that, then the movie would have been much better. As it is, the movie is good, but it is not great. It is a nice movie, but it is not a great movie.

Jessica Rogers photo
Jessica Rogers

To be honest, I thought this movie would be a letdown after I saw the previews. I was very pleasantly surprised. This is a great story, told in a very realistic way. It is not like a Hollywood movie with a nice happy ending. There is no happy ending and there is a big fight at the end. It is a good story. I think the actors did a good job with their roles. The story does get a little slow at times, but that is the way it is supposed to be. The songs are good too. I recommend this movie to anyone who is into romance movies. It is a good movie.

Kyle Santos photo
Kyle Santos

This film is basically a chronological narrative of the life of the Queen Elizabeth II. She is the subject of an obsessive male romantic obsession, a complex web of family relationships and the political upheavals of the time. The film is certainly not a documentary, but it is made by someone who wants to document the Queen's life, so it's somewhat an acquired taste. The style of the film is beautiful, the acting is superb, and the dialogue is very interesting. The problem with this film is the pacing. The film is divided into four parts, each of which is about 15-20 minutes long. It is difficult to follow all of the plot lines at once, and I didn't feel like I was getting much of the Queen's story. The first part is a mixture of flashbacks and fiction. It is difficult to follow, and the way the flashbacks are presented is confusing. The second part is the most linear, and has the most interesting stories. It is the longest and has the most fascinating stories. The third part is the most exciting and the most enjoyable. The fourth part is a bit more linear. This film is very well made, and has a beautiful style. I would recommend it, but I would recommend this movie as a stand-alone film.

Alan S. photo
Alan S.

I didn't expect much from this movie, but I was very pleasantly surprised. It is not Oscar material, but it is a well-written story that kept me interested and watching. I'm not a fan of the singer Madonna, but she did a great job. She plays the role of the young virgin with a lot of sensitivity and charm. Her acting is excellent. I've never seen her in a movie before, but she was very convincing. She definitely deserves an Oscar nomination. I think the only thing I didn't like was the story. The director, Mark Romanek, made the story very "narrow" and almost to the point of being boring. It was not a very interesting story, but I didn't mind it. I'm glad that I didn't pay for this movie, but I wouldn't recommend it to anyone.

Gerald Ray photo
Gerald Ray

I've been in love with Virginian's since I first saw her in the film "The Rocky Horror Picture Show" in the late 80's. In fact, I was the one that got her a part in "Love and Death" and she's a fan of both of those films. I was hoping that this film would be the same as the original, which I had never seen before. But I was extremely disappointed. It's like a prequel to "The Rocky Horror Picture Show" which was a prequel to "House of Wax". I was expecting it to be more like "House of Wax", but it was nothing like it. I felt like I was watching a different film. The acting was very poor. I felt like the characters were just like they were in the original. The film also has a lot of plot holes. Why would the main character, Rachel, be so confident in her relationship with Ed, when she was really not that confident in herself? And I'm not saying this to be mean. But the plot holes are so huge that I can't help but wonder why the film was made. I can't help but wonder what was the purpose of the film, because it was very very disappointing. I thought it was a very poor film. I really wanted to like it, but I just couldn't. The only good thing about this film was the music, but that was really all it had going for it. I think it was just made to be a prequel to the original and to show what happened to the original, but it was nothing like that. I just don't see the point. The only thing I would like to say is that I would like to see a remake of this film. If you are a fan of the original, I think you will like this film. If you are not, I think you will be very disappointed.

Cynthia Ellis photo
Cynthia Ellis

I don't know why the movie isn't getting the praise it deserves. I guess it is because people expected too much from it. I really enjoyed the movie and the story is very realistic. If you are looking for an entertaining movie, this one is not for you. But if you like romantic movies, I would recommend it.

Eric photo
Eric

This movie was well acted. I am a fan of the movie, but for the most part, it didn't bring anything new to the table. It had its moments, but it didn't feel fresh or exciting. I like the idea behind the movie, but the story didn't follow through. The characters were weak, especially the main characters. I didn't like how they just "abandoned" their relationship and then just kept talking about it. I didn't like how they just kept on getting back together and it just felt like a "come-on" to get back together. I also didn't like the way they took advantage of the little girl in the hospital, because it was very manipulative and showed a lack of character development. This movie is definitely worth a watch, but it wasn't as good as I expected it to be.

Doris R. photo
Doris R.

I can't say that this movie was great. The plot was cliche and the characters were flat. But it was pretty good. The costumes and the scenery were beautiful. And the ending was good. I think that this movie would be better if it was more of a drama and less of a romance. But it was still pretty good. I would recommend this movie to people who like action movies.

Nicholas Fowler photo
Nicholas Fowler

This is a story about two teenagers who have very different life experiences. One lives in a house and has a job, the other lives in a train station. It's quite a simple story and does not really have much of a story to tell. What it does have is some nice cinematography and some nice acting. It's also a bit of a story about people. I don't know what the people who have not seen this movie have seen that is so good. But I do know what they have not seen is what I have seen. And it is great.

Rose R. photo
Rose R.

A simple but well-written film about a relationship between two very different people, whose life experiences are so different, and how they each handle their differences. It's very much like a real life situation, so don't expect to be swept away by the magic of it all. The movie is not about a love story, but about friendship and commitment, and how difficult it is to accept the difference between the two people, and their expectations of the relationship. I really liked the story and the characters, and they were all quite likable. The director was able to capture the love of the two people, and it's easy to feel for the character. All in all, a nice film, not too long and not too slow. I recommend it to all those who like a little romance and a little bit of real life.

Shirley Ortega photo
Shirley Ortega

I know that this movie is not about love, but the end is the only time that this movie has a good ending. The first half was pretty slow, and the second half was the best. I'm a huge fan of Martin Scorsese's work, and he did a great job with this movie. The cinematography was great, and the acting was great. I loved this movie, and I recommend it to everyone.

Denise Lane photo
Denise Lane

I have not read the novel of this movie, so I cannot comment on the actual details of the plot. However, the movie itself was a movie about the life of a couple. The fact that the wife was a book author, and the husband a movie director, made for a very intriguing and interesting story. I enjoyed the acting of both Jennifer Lawrence and Julianne Moore, especially Julianne. I also enjoyed the music. There was a lot of "thrill" in this movie, and I liked the twists in the plot. I also found the relationship between the mother and daughter very interesting. The movie was an excellent movie.

Laura W. photo
Laura W.

The second film from legendary director Akira Kurosawa. Based on the novel of the same name by Kazuo Shiga, "The Last Emperor" is set in the Japanese period between the Meiji Restoration (1868) and the Meiji period (1879) and the last emperor, Prince Moten, is captured by the revolutionary forces and later on, the warlord Kamakura. The film begins with Prince Moten on the verge of death from the largepox epidemic. His lover and brother-in-law, Empress Meiji, is outraged at his condition and decides to help him by giving him a magical potion that will keep him alive and well. Moten takes the potion and, with the help of the nurse-maid, a former slave, they create a statue of a snake that will protect him. But it is not long before Prince Moten discovers that the snake has magical powers and uses them to help the revolutionaries. He leads his forces to the capital and destroys the old imperial palace and takes the throne. Empress Meiji, Prince Moten's mother, then assumes the throne and declares war against Kamakura. In the midst of the war, the snake is stolen and used by the revolutionaries as a weapon. Moten is recaptured and imprisoned. Prince Moten is determined to free him and asks the snake to help him. The snake, however, becomes suspicious of Moten and his followers and, in a desperate act, tries to kill him. Moten is finally released and Prince Moten learns that he is the last emperor. The snake, however, does not want Moten to be the emperor and continues to try to kill him. "The Last Emperor" is a slow, sentimental and sometimes dull film that I found quite boring and somewhat long-winded. It is a film that is worth seeing once. It is well worth watching, however, for the story itself and the art direction and the gorgeous landscapes and the fine performances. The film is rather slow and the story is not very interesting. The cast does a fine job and the two leads, Takao Kitamura and Tatsuya Nakadai, are quite convincing. Kitamura is a fine actor and Nakadai is an excellent actor. I thought the film was an improvement over the first film. It has much more action and the story is more interesting. The film is much better than the previous film. If you are a fan of Kurosawa's films, then I would recommend watching "The Last Emperor". It is a good film and, although it is slow and not very interesting, it is still a very good film. I give "The Last Emperor" a "B"

Deborah photo
Deborah

What a pleasant surprise this film is. From the opening scene, you know that it is going to be a well-crafted, well-written, and well-directed film. This film is also wonderfully acted and directed. We have a story about a young boy who is transported to a mysterious island in the Pacific Ocean and meets an older woman. The story follows their relationship and how it changes as the story unfolds. This film is full of colorful characters. You really feel for these characters. The director, Richard Kelly, shows us the world through the eyes of these characters. The director uses a lot of different camera angles and filming techniques. I was surprised at how much of the film was done in the camera. He used a lot of different cameras in this film. The director and writer, Andrew Davis, created a film that is both a heart-wrenching story and also a story of friendship. You truly feel for these characters. The characters are very well-written. You can feel for them, and you want them to be happy. The story is very interesting and makes you want to learn more about these people. The director, Richard Kelly, is a very talented filmmaker. I feel that he really showed his talent in this film. The acting in this film is very well done. The actors really make you feel for these characters. This is a great story about friendship and how one person can affect so many people. I would recommend this film to anyone who loves a good story. It is a wonderful film that you will love. I hope you enjoy it as much as I did.

Julie C. photo
Julie C.

I thought this film was interesting and I enjoyed the fact that the women were not all either good or bad. They all had something to offer and some of the men were good people. I think the film had a very realistic portrayal of the women's lives. The acting was good and the story was good. It was a good film. The only thing that I did not like was the ending. It was a bit rushed and I think it could have been better.